2007 Awards - Entry Luxury

Started by SVT666, July 25, 2007, 11:41:00 AM

Best Entry Luxury Sedan

BMW 3 Series
20 (50%)
Mercedes C-Class
3 (7.5%)
Cadillac CTS
1 (2.5%)
Acura TSX
1 (2.5%)
Acura TL
5 (12.5%)
Infinity G35
6 (15%)
Audi A4
4 (10%)

Total Members Voted: 37

Voting closed: August 01, 2007, 11:41:00 AM

nickdrinkwater

Quote from: Raza  on July 30, 2007, 06:42:11 AM
Would you consider the 911 to look dated?  Its shape has been around for 40 years. 

The 911 is an iconic design and the fact that it has looked the same for so long is one of the reasons why it so successful.

I wouldn't call the A4 an iconic design.

ro51092

Quote from: nickdrinkwater on July 30, 2007, 08:36:35 AM
The 911 is an iconic design and the fact that it has looked the same for so long is one of the reasons why it so successful.

I wouldn't call the A4 an iconic design.

Fuck you.  :evildude:

nickdrinkwater

At least I kept the Porsche in you happy  :huh:

:evildude:

Raza

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

Raza

Quote from: nickdrinkwater on July 30, 2007, 08:36:35 AM
The 911 is an iconic design and the fact that it has looked the same for so long is one of the reasons why it so successful.

I wouldn't call the A4 an iconic design.

My disagreement here is that subtle changes (B6 to B7) tend to keep the cars from looking dated.  When companies go through drastic design changes (such as BMW or Cadillac), that tends to date the looks.  The forthcoming crop of Mercedes cars will look dated soon as well. 
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

SVT666

Quote from: Raza ?link=topic=10321.msg524224#msg524224 date=1185807935
What about the current Mustang?
Porsche has done a fantastic job of keeping the 911 shape looking current for 40 years.? My problem with the shape is that every 911 in 40 yearrs has had the same shape...although more modern with every rendition.? The Mustang hasn't looked the same for 40 years.  I couldn't spend $100,000 on a car that most people can't differentiate from a 20 year old example of the same car.

Raza

Quote from: HEMI666 on July 30, 2007, 09:37:44 AM
Porsche has done a fantastic job of keeping the 911 shape looking current for 40 years.? My problem with the shape is that every 911 in 40 yearrs has had the same shape...although more modern with every rendition.? The Mustang hasn't looked the same for 40 years.? I couldn't spend $100,000 on a car that most people can't differentiate from a 20 year old example of the same car.

But isn't going retro making a car dated on purpose?
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

SVT666

Quote from: Raza ?link=topic=10321.msg524255#msg524255 date=1185810019
But isn't going retro making a car dated on purpose?
The difference is that the Mustang doesn't look like all the Mustangs that came before it.  The 911 does.

JYODER240

Quote from: HEMI666 on July 30, 2007, 09:37:44 AM
Porsche has done a fantastic job of keeping the 911 shape looking current for 40 years.? My problem with the shape is that every 911 in 40 yearrs has had the same shape...although more modern with every rendition.? The Mustang hasn't looked the same for 40 years.? I couldn't spend $100,000 on a car that most people can't differentiate from a 20 year old example of the same car.

It's supposed too. The design is supposed to be evolutionary. It's supposed to have a cohesiveness to it so that when people see it they know it is a 911. The same way current Audis look alike, and Mercedes look alike, and Cadillacs look alike, etc. Chevy has done the same with the Vette only not as well.

and please are you telling me that most people can't tell these two apart :rolleyes:



/////////////////////////
Quit living as if the purpose of life is to arrive safely at death


*President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 thread" club*

heelntoe

Quote from: HEMI666 on July 30, 2007, 09:37:44 AM
Porsche has done a fantastic job of keeping the 911 shape looking current for 40 years.  My problem with the shape is that every 911 in 40 yearrs has had the same shape...although more modern with every rendition.  The Mustang hasn't looked the same for 40 years.  I couldn't spend $100,000 on a car that most people can't differentiate from a 20 year old example of the same car.
the thing with that is that even if someone mistook the car for a 40 year old one, a 40 year old porsche is just as awesome if not awesommer. :lol:
@heelntoe

Raza

Quote from: HEMI666 on July 30, 2007, 09:45:26 AM
The difference is that the Mustang doesn't look like all the Mustangs that came before it.? The 911 does.


Since when does looking dated mean it bears resemblance to other cars in its evolutionary line?  What I take it to mean is that it looks like it came from an era that has passed.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

SVT666

Quote from: Raza ?link=topic=10321.msg524275#msg524275 date=1185810617
Since when does looking dated mean it bears resemblance to other cars in its evolutionary line?? What I take it to mean is that it looks like it came from an era that has passed.
Design is subjective.  I find it looks dated.  You don't.  Big deal.  Any time someone says something you don't like about a Porsche it's the end of the freakin world. :nono:

Raza

Quote from: HEMI666 on July 30, 2007, 10:10:35 AM
Design is subjective.? I find it looks dated.? You don't.? Big deal.? Any time someone says something you don't like about a Porsche it's the end of the freakin world. :nono:

Design's actually not subjective, but that's another issue.

I honestly think we're arguing over semantics here.  I think you think you think it looks dated.  I think dated is the wrong word. 
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

SVT666

You don't think that a car can be beautiful to one person and not to another?

Raza

Quote from: HEMI666 on July 30, 2007, 10:15:56 AM
You don't think that a car can be beautiful to one person and not to another?

Two things go into the way a car looks:

Design and styling.

Design is not subjective. 

Styling is, though.  That's the difference. 

Take two cars as an example; the Dodge Charger and the Chrysler 300.  They have the exact same design.  But the styling is different.  I hate the 300, but I love the Charger.  But that comes down to styling, not design, since the proportions are wrong.  It's mostly a semantic issue, though. 
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

SVT666

Quote from: Raza ?link=topic=10321.msg524441#msg524441 date=1185815935
Two things go into the way a car looks:

Design and styling.

Design is not subjective.?

Styling is, though.? That's the difference.?

Take two cars as an example; the Dodge Charger and the Chrysler 300.? They have the exact same design.? But the styling is different.? I hate the 300, but I love the Charger.? But that comes down to styling, not design, since the proportions are wrong.? It's mostly a semantic issue, though.?
You know what I meant.  Semantics can be a killer. :ohyeah:

Raza

Quote from: HEMI666 on July 30, 2007, 11:21:57 AM
You know what I meant.? Semantics can be a killer. :ohyeah:

Yeah, but you know I'm pretty strict about that shit.

:thumbsup:
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

nickdrinkwater

Quote from: Raza  on July 30, 2007, 09:07:27 AM
My disagreement here is that subtle changes (B6 to B7) tend to keep the cars from looking dated.  When companies go through drastic design changes (such as BMW or Cadillac), that tends to date the looks.  The forthcoming crop of Mercedes cars will look dated soon as well. 

I agree with you.  Evolution is definitely better than revolution, and yeah I do think that the latest Mercs will date quickly.  However, I don't think the A4 has evolved quite enough over recent years - they can still evolve from the current shape, just a little bit more significantly - like the Audi 80 - Audi A4 for example.  The current A4 evolution has just been a little to subtle.

MexicoCityM3

3er. In any trim. Big surprise.
Founder, BMW Car Club de México
http://bmwclub.org.mx
'05 M3 E46 6SPD Mystic Blue
'08 M5 E60 SMG  Space Grey
'11 1M E82 6SPD Sapphire Black
'16 GT4 (1/3rd Share lol)
'18 M3 CS
'16 X5 5.0i (Wife)
'14 MINI Cooper Countryman S Automatic (For Sale)