Lagonda BFD Concept..........

Started by 2o6, March 04, 2009, 07:34:54 AM

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

2o6

March 04, 2009, 07:34:54 AM
Ummn........







Ew.

ChrisV

#1
March 04, 2009, 07:38:28 AM
Like a fine Detroit wine, this vehicle has aged to budgetary perfection...

Tave

#2
March 04, 2009, 07:38:37 AM
As I write, highly civilized human beings are flying overhead, trying to kill me.

Quote from: thecarnut on March 16, 2008, 10:33:43 AM
Depending on price, that could be a good deal.

93JC

#3
March 04, 2009, 07:55:11 AM
So what's BFD stand for? "Big Fucking Deal"?

If so, 'BFD' captures my antipathy for this thing quite well.

FoMoJo

#4
March 04, 2009, 09:10:35 AM
I guess this is what happens when designers run out of ideas :huh:.
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." ~ Albert Einstein
"As the saying goes, when you mix science and politics, you get politics."

the Teuton

#5
March 04, 2009, 09:22:48 AM
2. 1995 Saturn SL2 5-speed, 126,500 miles. 5,000 miles in two and a half months. That works out to 24,000 miles per year if I can keep up the pace.

Quote from: CJ on April 06, 2010, 10:48:54 PM
I don't care about all that shit.  I'll be going to college to get an education at a cost to my parents.  I'm not going to fool around.
Quote from: MrH on January 14, 2011, 01:13:53 PM
She'll hate diesel passenger cars, all things Ford, and fiat currency.  They will masturbate to old interviews of Ayn Rand an youtube together.
You can take the troll out of the Subaru, but you can't take the Subaru out of the troll!

Eye of the Tiger

#6
March 04, 2009, 09:23:49 AM
2008 TUNDRA (Truck Ultra-wideband Never-say-die Daddy Rottweiler Awesome)

SVT666

#7
March 04, 2009, 09:27:54 AM
Why can't non-traditional automakers stop building crossovers and SUVs?  Stick to your high end sports and GT cars. 

2o6

#8
March 04, 2009, 10:00:01 AM
Quote from: HEMI666 on March 04, 2009, 09:27:54 AM
Why can't non-traditional automakers stop building crossovers and SUVs?  Stick to your high end sports and GT cars. 


Well, they're instant profit. Sports cars don't always have the highest profit margin, I guess. Besides, the LM002 was an excellent Lambo. It took the amazing on road prowess, and applied it to off road.

TBR

#9
March 04, 2009, 07:49:56 PM
Quote from: 2o6 on March 04, 2009, 10:00:01 AM

Well, they're instant profit. Sports cars don't always have the highest profit margin, I guess. Besides, the LM002 was an excellent Lambo. It took the amazing on road prowess, and applied it to off road.

Hah, I bet Ferrari and Lamborghini have huge profit margins.

But, the problem is they can't keep those high margins and increase production without introducing new models. Eventually those new models have to be something besides super cars.

Laconian

#10
March 04, 2009, 09:37:40 PM
Quote from: 2o6 on March 04, 2009, 10:00:01 AM

Well, they're instant profit. Sports cars don't always have the highest profit margin, I guess. Besides, the LM002 was an excellent Lambo. It took the amazing on road prowess, and applied it to off road.
Instant profit IF you are basing it off of an existing product/platform with the R&D expenses already paid off.

Quote from: HEMI666 on March 04, 2009, 09:27:54 AM
Why can't non-traditional automakers stop building crossovers and SUVs?  Stick to your high end sports and GT cars. 
Sadly, SUVs suit status seekers satisfactorily. Sucks!
Kia EV6 GT-Line / MX-5 RF 6MT
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions