Generations! (Honda Civic)

Started by 2o6, June 30, 2011, 11:03:26 AM

Which is your favorite Civic?

Gen 1
3 (10.7%)
Gen 2
0 (0%)
Gen 3
1 (3.6%)
Gen 4
7 (25%)
Gen 5
5 (17.9%)
Gen 6
10 (35.7%)
Gen 7
2 (7.1%)
Gen 8
0 (0%)
Gen 9
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 25

2o6

A popular car that has ingrained it's name in the hearts of schoolmarms and car enthusiasts alike. For a long time, it was a great balance between family car and sporty commuter, even proving to be capable of slaughtering cars on the track that are quadruple the price.


Which is your favorite?



















68_427

Quotewhere were you when automotive dream died
i was sat at home drinking brake fluid when wife ring
'racecar is die'
no


Cookie Monster

Hard to choose between the 4th, 5th and 6th for me.
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

2o6

5th for me. Always thought 4th was too spartan, and 6th too bland. (To look at)

Cookie Monster

Quote from: 2o6 on June 30, 2011, 11:29:36 AM
5th for me. Always thought 4th was too spartan, and 6th too bland. (To look at)
Well, I've always liked the super boxiness of the EF sedan for some reason.

I think between the 5th and 6th though, I'd choose the 5th.
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

hotrodalex

4th.

5th is a close second, though.

Onslaught

4th. But in the end I've never been a huge fan of any of them. I can't stand my girlfriends 2000 Civic EX

sportyaccordy

Ohh this is tough.

Let's get the bad ones out of the way. 1st & 2nd have H&H significance but are not exciting. 3rd gen was neither significant nor exciting. 7th gen made advances, but got a little too big and had the worst rear suspension design to ever come from Honda. Race teams have gained permission from governing bodies to completely redesign them to make them competitive. They were that bad when lowered (stock they were alright). First try at strut suspension came w/some issues too. 9th gen looks better than the 8th gen but the CSi was severely neutered. Still has that awful dash too.

4th gen was excellent... maybe the 3rd best for a performance platform base (more on this later). CRXs can be brought down well under 2000lbs with drivers and DOHC VTEC engines in race trim. I kind of like how these look.

5th & 6th gen were only better... taking off from where the 4th gen started and adding much needed (but still inadequate) chassis rigidity, and respectable interior space. These are tied IMO for 2nd best performance platform. I'm partial to the more developed looks of the 6th gen, particularly in coupe form.

8th gen IMO is the best performance platform. The CTR speaks for itself, either hanging ten with or outright beating Honda greats like the NSX & S2K on the track. Rear suspension was revamped and fixed, along w/the little issues from the front. USA CSi got 90% of the engine it deserved with the K20Z1, which is a little anemic in stock form but potent + punch w/mild aftermarket input. Still too expensive to be the weekend warriors the 4th-6th gen have come to be, but great as a daily driver. If only they rectified that awful dash....

My pick of the litter would prob be a 6th gen coupe for a DD, and a 4th gen hatch w/an H22 for a weekend tool. For me DDability takes top priority as nearly anything small, stripped and uncorked can be great fun... so 6th gen it is.

BimmerM3

I don't have a whole lot of experience with Civics, but the EP3 Si I drove sure was fun.

Eye of the Tiger

I have owned a 4th and 7th gen Civic. I liked the 4th better. It won autocrosses, and was fun.
2008 TUNDRA (Truck Ultra-wideband Never-say-die Daddy Rottweiler Awesome)

2o6

I thought the 7th Gen's problem was the switch to MacPherson struts, not changing the rear suspension?

Soup DeVille

Quote from: 2o6 on June 30, 2011, 09:05:09 PM
I thought the 7th Gen's problem was the switch to MacPherson struts, not changing the rear suspension?

They go hand in hand: and neither end worked as well as the previous ones did.
Maybe we need to start off small. I mean, they don't let you fuck the glumpers at Glumpees without a level 4 FuckPass, do they?

1975 Honda CB750, 1986 Rebel Rascal (sailing dinghy), 2015 Mini Cooper, 2020 Winnebago 31H (E450), 2021 Toyota 4Runner, 2022 Lincoln Aviator

Vinsanity

In its day, the 5th gen seemed to be the biggest leap in progress compared to the others. To me, at least...I always considered that time period to be a coming of age/golden era of Japanese cars in general. The 5th gen Civic was often referred to as a poor man's shrunken Acura Legend. My sister's first car was a '94 Civic EX sedan, and I thought it was pretty neat; it was packaged very well for its size. Ultimately, it got my vote because it's the body style that made the most people familiar with the Civic name.

S204STi

Which gen was the last Si hatch?  I'd go with that one.

2o6

Neon and Civic were the cars to beat in the mid 90's. Neon had quality issues, but it drove great and was super quick. Civic was fun to drive and well built. The rest is unremarkable, IMO.

Quote from: R-inge on June 30, 2011, 09:17:22 PM
Which gen was the last Si hatch?  I'd go with that one.

7th. But Europe did get an 8th gen Si hatch, but it's widely regarded as being disappointing. (Torsion beam rear end makes the whole car sad)

Eye of the Tiger

Quote from: 2o6 on June 30, 2011, 09:05:09 PM
I thought the 7th Gen's problem was the switch to MacPherson struts, not changing the rear suspension?

Struts were boring and the understeer was dumb, and I don't even remember what the rear suspension was.... but it had a FLAT REAR FLOOR OMG YAY. Not a bad car for crusing, but not as fun as the older ones.
2008 TUNDRA (Truck Ultra-wideband Never-say-die Daddy Rottweiler Awesome)

2o6

Quote from: Eye of the Tiger on June 30, 2011, 09:19:00 PM
Struts were boring and the understeer was dumb, and I don't even remember what the rear suspension was.... but it had a FLAT REAR FLOOR OMG YAY. Not a bad car for crusing, but not as fun as the older ones.

It was a multilink setup, IIRC, compared to the double wishbones on all wheels on the old cars.




The Pirate

Loved my 6th gen, still sometimes wish I had it.  I put a ton of miles on that car in short period of time with minimal issues.  Decently fun for what it was, too.

1989 Audi 80 quattro, 2001 Mazda Protege ES

Secretary of the "I Survived the Volvo S80 thread" Club

Quote from: omicron on July 10, 2007, 10:58:12 PM
After you wake up with the sun at 6am on someone's floor, coughing up cigarette butts and tasting like warm beer, you may well change your opinion on this matter.

the Teuton

I love the 4th and the 6th. I'd probably get a 6th.
2. 1995 Saturn SL2 5-speed, 126,500 miles. 5,000 miles in two and a half months. That works out to 24,000 miles per year if I can keep up the pace.

Quote from: CJ on April 06, 2010, 10:48:54 PM
I don't care about all that shit.  I'll be going to college to get an education at a cost to my parents.  I'm not going to fool around.
Quote from: MrH on January 14, 2011, 01:13:53 PM
She'll hate diesel passenger cars, all things Ford, and fiat currency.  They will masturbate to old interviews of Ayn Rand an youtube together.
You can take the troll out of the Subaru, but you can't take the Subaru out of the troll!

Cookie Monster

Quote from: Vinsanity on June 30, 2011, 09:16:24 PM
In its day, the 5th gen seemed to be the biggest leap in progress compared to the others. To me, at least...I always considered that time period to be a coming of age/golden era of Japanese cars in general. The 5th gen Civic was often referred to as a poor man's shrunken Acura Legend. My sister's first car was a '94 Civic EX sedan, and I thought it was pretty neat; it was packaged very well for its size. Ultimately, it got my vote because it's the body style that made the most people familiar with the Civic name.
Yeah, I really enjoyed my friend's '92 Civic Sedan, even though it was completely beat to shit. It was a surprisingly fun car to drive.
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

hotrodalex

I wish my dad would have kept his '92 Integra and sold the Saturn instead.

Cookie Monster

Quote from: hotrodalex on June 30, 2011, 10:27:00 PM
I wish my dad would have kept his '92 Integra and sold the Saturn instead.
It always seems like parents own the cool cars before we can drive... :lol:

I would've loved to have my dad's '83 GLC or his Olds 88. :lol:
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

the Teuton

Quote from: hotrodalex on June 30, 2011, 10:27:00 PM
I wish my dad would have kept his '92 Integra and sold the Saturn instead.

Take that back!
2. 1995 Saturn SL2 5-speed, 126,500 miles. 5,000 miles in two and a half months. That works out to 24,000 miles per year if I can keep up the pace.

Quote from: CJ on April 06, 2010, 10:48:54 PM
I don't care about all that shit.  I'll be going to college to get an education at a cost to my parents.  I'm not going to fool around.
Quote from: MrH on January 14, 2011, 01:13:53 PM
She'll hate diesel passenger cars, all things Ford, and fiat currency.  They will masturbate to old interviews of Ayn Rand an youtube together.
You can take the troll out of the Subaru, but you can't take the Subaru out of the troll!

hotrodalex

Quote from: thecarnut on June 30, 2011, 10:30:15 PM
It always seems like parents own the cool cars before we can drive... :lol:

I would've loved to have my dad's '83 GLC or his Olds 88. :lol:

My brother drove it a couple of times. I moved it around in the driveway, but I think that's it. It was quite cool. Of course compared to the BMW he bought next, I'm not sure which one is cooler. :lol: (though I won't be getting the BMW when he's done with it... :cry: )


sportyaccordy

Quote from: 2o6 on June 30, 2011, 09:20:21 PM
It was a multilink setup, IIRC, compared to the double wishbones on all wheels on the old cars.
That in itself wasn't bad, the Accord has been running a multilink out back since '87

It was something to do with the motion ratio of the shocks. 4th-6th gen Civics needed no more than maybe 1000lb springs in the rear to handle effectively on the track. And the geometry worked well when lowered + loaded. The 7th gen needed something like 4000lb springs (which required very custom shocks to control), AND its geometry blew. They kept the same multilink arrangement for the 8th gen, but addressed the motion ratio and loading issues. The front end had problems with tie rod placement that were also fixed. So the same setup w/some tweaks became instantly competitive....

CALL_911

Now that I think of it, I've never driven a Civic. That said, I sure do fancy a 6th gen Type R. Wouldn't mind a 7th gen Type R either.

Also, wow, I didn't realize how good the 4th gen Civic looked.


2004 S2000
2016 340xi

cawimmer430

4th generation by far. Clean and elegant "typical 1980s Japanese" design. Handsome to look at. It also has aged well and in some cases could pass for a car designed just a few years ago.

I also like generations 1-3. After the 4th generation the Civic started looking really boring. I have a little appreciation for the 6th generation, especially in 1.6 SiR form, but that's about it. I like the old Civics.
-2018 Mercedes-Benz A250 AMG Line (W177)



WIMMER FOTOGRAFIE - Professional Automotive Photography based in Munich, Germany
www.wimmerfotografie.de
www.facebook.com/wimmerfotografie

2o6

I liked the 8th generation "cheese wedge Civic". It still looks fresh despite being introduced in 2006.

68_427

Quote from: CALL_911 on July 01, 2011, 10:57:27 AM

Also, wow, I didn't realize how good the 4th gen Civic looked.

I see one everyday, and trust me... not all of them look good.  :lol:
Quotewhere were you when automotive dream died
i was sat at home drinking brake fluid when wife ring
'racecar is die'
no