Lexus ES!

Started by 2o6, April 03, 2012, 07:54:37 PM

CALL_911



Actually, I always thought this was a pretty decent looking car (the facelifted one only).


2004 S2000
2016 340xi

SVT_Power

I guess I'm the minority who thinks the new ES actually looks quite good
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit'. And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." - Ayrton Senna

Cookie Monster

Quote from: SVT_Power on April 04, 2012, 03:09:21 PM
I guess I'm the minority who thinks the new ES actually looks quite good
No I think it looks awesome.

I don't get where the bland/vanilla comments are coming from, though.
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

sportyaccordy

Quote from: SVT_Power on April 04, 2012, 03:09:21 PM
I guess I'm the minority who thinks the new ES actually looks quite good
Def not, dare I say its more bold than all the midsize German offerings, at least from these little pictures

cawimmer430

Quote from: CALL_911 on April 04, 2012, 11:52:48 AM
Yeah, you are. You like the C-Class more than the 3er (which you seem to somewhat dislike solely because it's more acclaimed than your beloved MB) because it's "more comfortable."

Funny. Everyone praises the 3er for its driving dynamics which are class leading, yet most people don't even buy a 3er for that feature. They buy them for the badge. That's true for all premium brands.

And to me the C-Class is the better car for my needs, which are not blasting down backroads because C&D said I should. I require more interior/luggage space and a C-Class offers more of that in both sedan and wagon form, just because the engine isn't pushed back behind the front axle.

So what are my priorities? Driving dynamics or overall practicality? C-Class wins for me because it offers what I need. I have nothing against the 3er. I just don't need or want one.


Quote from: CALL_911 on April 04, 2012, 11:52:48 AMThis, from a luxury standpoint, shits on the C-Class. It's probably better built too, to boot. Only reason you don't like it is because its a Lexus, which, in turn, you don't like because they've been shitting on MB for a while now.

:rolleyes:
-2018 Mercedes-Benz A250 AMG Line (W177)



WIMMER FOTOGRAFIE - Professional Automotive Photography based in Munich, Germany
www.wimmerfotografie.de
www.facebook.com/wimmerfotografie

Raza

Quote from: SVT_Power on April 04, 2012, 03:09:21 PM
I guess I'm the minority who thinks the new ES actually looks quite good

Blinded by the badge and platform.  It looks good, but I'd never own one.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.


Raza

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

CALL_911



2004 S2000
2016 340xi

FoMoJo

Do they only come in the one colour?
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." ~ Albert Einstein
"As the saying goes, when you mix science and politics, you get politics."

850CSi

Quote from: CALL_911 on April 04, 2012, 03:56:35 PM
You know I'm right.

You're seeing things in black and white. This is probably a better boring pure-lux mobile than a C-Klasse, but it's not either/or.


sportyaccordy

#72
Quote from: cawimmer430 on April 04, 2012, 03:14:25 PM
Funny. Everyone praises the 3er for its driving dynamics which are class leading, yet most people don't even buy a 3er for that feature. They buy them for the badge. That's true for all premium brands.

And to me the C-Class is the better car for my needs, which are not blasting down backroads because C&D said I should. I require more interior/luggage space and a C-Class offers more of that in both sedan and wagon form, just because the engine isn't pushed back behind the front axle.

So what are my priorities? Driving dynamics or overall practicality? C-Class wins for me because it offers what I need. I have nothing against the 3er. I just don't need or want one.


:rolleyes:

The new 3er is roomier than the C in every interior dimension

and has more trunk space (17.0 vs 12.4 cu ft)

So I'm kind of confused as to what you're talking about... if space is your priority the 3er is the better choice

By any objective measure the F30 is a better car than the W204... and its handily outsold it year after year despite being so "aggressive".... if you like the Benz because its a Benz thats fine, but stop trying to discredit anyone who sees how obvious the Bimmer's objective superiority is.

Likewise you can gripe all you want about Lexus being "boring", but I'm not sure how a run of the mill E350 is like $10-20K more exciting. An ES a good luxury car, period, nobody cares about H&H

thewizard16

#73
I like this new ES overall. The snout looks weird from that front side profile angle though, I don't care for the car from that angle.

Quote from: Eye of the Tiger on April 03, 2012, 10:33:29 PM
That's hilarious, because they are the same car.
If it was a simple rebadge, sure. Having the same (or mostly the same, I guess they may have changed some little things) mechanical bits doesn't make it the same car however, and I agree with iffy that this new model shares the least resemblance with its Camry cousin of any ES generation so far. They both have four doors, are the same size, and the new Camry's grille actually almost has a spindle-ish look itself I had never noticed before (if the two parts were connected like in the ES at those angles it would look very similar), but beyond that they look pretty different.  
92 Camry XLE V6(Murdered)
99 ES 300 (Sold)
2008 Volkswagen Passat(Did not survive the winter)
2015 Lexus GS350 F-Sport


Quote from: Raza  link=topic=27909.msg1787179#msg1787179 date=1349117110
You're my age.  We're getting old.  Plus, now that you're married, your life expectancy has gone way down, since you're more likely to be poisoned by your wife.

Madman

Meh.  Generic looking blob.  Remove the badge and it could be damn near anything.  :zzz:

Current cars: 2015 Ford Escape SE, 2011 MINI Cooper

Formerly owned cars: 2010 Mazda 5 Sport, 2008 Audi A4 2.0T S-Line Sedan, 2003 Volkswagen Passat GL 1.8T wagon, 1998 Ford Escort SE sedan, 2001 Cadillac Catera, 2000 Volkswagen Golf GLS 2.0 5-Door, 1997 Honda Odyssey LX, 1991 Volvo 240 sedan, 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo sedan, 1987 Volvo 240 DL sedan, 1990 Peugeot 405 DL Sportswagon, 1985 Peugeot 505 Turbo sedan, 1985 Merkur XR4Ti, 1983 Renault R9 Alliance DL sedan, 1979 Chevrolet Caprice Classic wagon, 1975 Volkswagen Transporter, 1980 Fiat X-1/9 Bertone, 1979 Volkswagen Rabbit C 3-Door hatch, 1976 Ford Pinto V6 coupe, 1952 Chevrolet Styleline Deluxe sedan

"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." ~ Isaac Asimov

"I much prefer the sharpest criticism of a single intelligent man to the thoughtless approval of the masses." - Johannes Kepler

"One of the most cowardly things ordinary people do is to shut their eyes to facts." - C.S. Lewis

cawimmer430

Quote from: sportyaccordy on April 04, 2012, 07:32:09 PM
The new 3er is roomier than the C in every interior dimension

and has more trunk space (17.0 vs 12.4 cu ft)

So I'm kind of confused as to what you're talking about... if space is your priority the 3er is the better choice

By any objective measure the F30 is a better car than the W204... and its handily outsold it year after year despite being so "aggressive".... if you like the Benz because its a Benz thats fine, but stop trying to discredit anyone who sees how obvious the Bimmer's objective superiority is.

I'm talking about the wagons and I'm not talking about the new 3er vs the "old" W204 C-Class.

When the BMW 118i had its steering system replaced (a common defect on the 1-Series in Europe), I got a ride home in a 3er Touring and all my equipment in the 1er was put into the back of the 3ers trunk: it barely fit. Half my shit had to be stored on the rear seats. The trunk of the 3er Touring was narrow and small. The S204 C-Class wagon on the other hand had a nice wide and roomy trunk. I visited the local Benz dealer on purpose to test if my stuff fit and I managed to fit more of my gear into the back than I did in the 3er Touring. C-Class wins for me based on that.

And I'll say it again. I've driven a few W204 C-Classes. They're comfortable and they drive good. They can be driven in a sporty fashion and they're competent in that regard. That's all I need, so I don't need a 3er or an A4. In fact I don't care much about driving dynamics because I tend to drive in a relaxed and elegant manner. I don't care if a 3er drives better, so what? It's not what I am looking for.
-2018 Mercedes-Benz A250 AMG Line (W177)



WIMMER FOTOGRAFIE - Professional Automotive Photography based in Munich, Germany
www.wimmerfotografie.de
www.facebook.com/wimmerfotografie

sportyaccordy

Quote from: cawimmer430 on April 05, 2012, 05:08:55 AM
I'm talking about the wagons and I'm not talking about the new 3er vs the "old" W204 C-Class.
Then what are you talking about? The W204 is the current model

Quote from: cawimmer430 on April 05, 2012, 05:08:55 AMWhen the BMW 118i had its steering system replaced (a common defect on the 1-Series in Europe), I got a ride home in a 3er Touring and all my equipment in the 1er was put into the back of the 3ers trunk: it barely fit. Half my shit had to be stored on the rear seats. The trunk of the 3er Touring was narrow and small. The S204 C-Class wagon on the other hand had a nice wide and roomy trunk. I visited the local Benz dealer on purpose to test if my stuff fit and I managed to fit more of my gear into the back than I did in the 3er Touring. C-Class wins for me based on that.
So you just said you didn't want to compare the new 3 to the "old" (???) C class, but now you are comparing the latest C-class to the old (E91) 3er? 

Quote from: cawimmer430 on April 05, 2012, 05:08:55 AMAnd I'll say it again. I've driven a few W204 C-Classes. They're comfortable and they drive good. They can be driven in a sporty fashion and they're competent in that regard. That's all I need, so I don't need a 3er or an A4. In fact I don't care much about driving dynamics because I tend to drive in a relaxed and elegant manner. I don't care if a 3er drives better, so what? It's not what I am looking for.
Driving dynamics is not just at the limit performance and feel, it's also ride comfort and general confidence. Just like your 1 series, there are "non enthusiast" spec 3s, and by any metric the F30 is better in those regards too. Just as comfortable, roomier, more economical to run, not much more (if at all) expensive. So stop acting like one is sacrificing anything in getting a 3er over a C-Class. The C is inferior in more than performance, it's just inferior period, and if it wasn't a Mercedes you wouldn't care about it. If the BMW was badged a Benz you would be celebrating its dominance and applauding the magazines that deemed it #1. You have this irrational need to defend Benz and discredit anyone/anything that doesn't see things the way you do. Its goofy as hell.

The W204 is not a bad car but its in no way the best car in class, except for folks who prefer Mercedes' as a brand emotionally.

sportyaccordy

And for someone who values space, fuel economy, and comfort, the ES will definitely be a better buy than an equivalent C class

Raza

Quote from: sportyaccordy on April 04, 2012, 07:32:09 PM
The new 3er is roomier than the C in every interior dimension

and has more trunk space (17.0 vs 12.4 cu ft)

So I'm kind of confused as to what you're talking about... if space is your priority the 3er is the better choice


17 cubic feet of trunk space!?  Holy shit.  I always considered my trunk to be cavernous, and it's 15 cubic feet.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

sportyaccordy

Quote from: Raza  on April 05, 2012, 08:31:12 AM

17 cubic feet of trunk space!?  Holy shit.  I always considered my trunk to be cavernous, and it's 15 cubic feet.
Thats what they say. I imagine the F3x wagon will similarly dominate the W204 wagon in trunk space too.

The 3er is longer + wider than the C which prob helps too.

Eye of the Tiger

Quote from: sportyaccordy on April 05, 2012, 10:00:44 AM
Thats what they say. I imagine the F3x wagon will similarly dominate the W204 wagon in trunk space too.

The 3er is longer + wider than the C which prob helps too.

You say F3xW2043erC... I say FX-16 GT-S

2008 TUNDRA (Truck Ultra-wideband Never-say-die Daddy Rottweiler Awesome)

2o6

Now Lexus needs to do the IS in a sexy fashion, and we're good!

thewizard16

Quote from: 2o6 on April 05, 2012, 08:59:31 PM
Now Lexus needs to do the IS in a sexy fashion, and we're good!
I like the current IS. It was the first Lexus sedan I considered sporty/good looking overall in ... maybe ever.
92 Camry XLE V6(Murdered)
99 ES 300 (Sold)
2008 Volkswagen Passat(Did not survive the winter)
2015 Lexus GS350 F-Sport


Quote from: Raza  link=topic=27909.msg1787179#msg1787179 date=1349117110
You're my age.  We're getting old.  Plus, now that you're married, your life expectancy has gone way down, since you're more likely to be poisoned by your wife.

SVT_Power

Quote from: thewizard16 on April 05, 2012, 11:55:38 PM
I like the current IS. It was the first Lexus sedan I considered sporty/good looking overall in ... maybe ever.

The first gen IS is probably the best driving lexus so far, save for the LFA. But I do suppose it's not much of a sporty looking car
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit'. And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." - Ayrton Senna

TurboDan

#84
Quote from: cawimmer430 on April 04, 2012, 03:14:25 PM
Funny. Everyone praises the 3er for its driving dynamics which are class leading, yet most people don't even buy a 3er for that feature. They buy them for the badge. That's true for all premium brands.

:rolleyes:

Wow, so false. 3er has more space, and it's contained in an interior that doesn't resemble a mid 2000s Acura. ;)

And YES, most people DO choose the Beamer bc of its driving dynamics. As I've said, the average buyer can't always articulate it, but they can tell the BMW is a better driving car than the Benz. And honestly, it has a more Spartan, but desirable, interior. Been that way for years.

Raza

Quote from: thewizard16 on April 05, 2012, 11:55:38 PM
I like the current IS. It was the first Lexus sedan I considered sporty/good looking overall in ... maybe ever.

I do like it as well.  Shame that their dealer networks never stock manuals and mostly only stock AWD models in this part of the country or I would have considered an IS250 instead of my Jetta.  But, when it comes down to it, my Jetta makes the same power from a turbo engine and weighs about the same, if not less, so I think I'm better off.  2 to 1 it handles better than the IS250 too, since they tend to keep the sporty stuff for the auto-only 350.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

sportyaccordy

I don't think you could deal with the low power of the IS250. Its heavier + less torquey than your car. The 350 is a fucking rocket though

cawimmer430

Quote from: sportyaccordy on April 05, 2012, 06:01:23 AM
So you just said you didn't want to compare the new 3 to the "old" (???) C class, but now you are comparing the latest C-class to the old (E91) 3er? 

I'm comparing the "old" E90 WAGON to the current S204 C-Class WAGON.

The current F30 WAGON isn't even out yet. Once it is, then we can talk. And it'll most likely be hampered by the fact that BMW places their engines behind the front axle. No matter how intelligent the interior design, this will always take away some precious interior space.




Quote from: sportyaccordy on April 05, 2012, 06:01:23 AMThe C is inferior in more than performance, it's just inferior period, and if it wasn't a Mercedes you wouldn't care about it. If the BMW was badged a Benz you would be celebrating its dominance and applauding the magazines that deemed it #1.

Oh please. The C-Class has good driving dynamics that'll satisfy most people. If you want something sportier there's always a 3er or Infiniti G. Big deal.

I don't drive like crazy, I don't need a 3er and the current S204 wagon offers more interior and luggage space than the E90 Wagon. I don't need to explain which car I would choose here based on what my needs are.



Quote from: sportyaccordy on April 05, 2012, 06:01:23 AMYou have this irrational need to defend Benz and discredit anyone/anything that doesn't see things the way you do. Its goofy as hell.

Really?

Guess you missed those posts where I hate on the new M-Class, SLK or SL.

When someone comes along and claims that "every single car in this class needs to try and beat the 3er", then I have a problem with that. Because it's bullshit. The Mercedes C-Class has never tried to be dynamically superior car. It's focus was always on a balance between sport and luxury and it does that quite well.
-2018 Mercedes-Benz A250 AMG Line (W177)



WIMMER FOTOGRAFIE - Professional Automotive Photography based in Munich, Germany
www.wimmerfotografie.de
www.facebook.com/wimmerfotografie

cawimmer430

Quote from: TurboDan on April 06, 2012, 02:46:33 AM
Wow, so false. 3er has more space, and it's contained in an interior that doesn't resemble a mid 2000s Acura. ;)

Nope. E90 Wagon vs S204 Wagon has less space.
-2018 Mercedes-Benz A250 AMG Line (W177)



WIMMER FOTOGRAFIE - Professional Automotive Photography based in Munich, Germany
www.wimmerfotografie.de
www.facebook.com/wimmerfotografie

Raza

Quote from: sportyaccordy on April 06, 2012, 09:02:43 AM
I don't think you could deal with the low power of the IS250. Its heavier + less torquey than your car. The 350 is a fucking rocket though

I see where you're coming from, but you forget.  I was coming from the 1.8T 5AT Passat, a 170bhp, 3400 pound car.  It was a hell of a lot of fun, but not at all fast.  0-60 was mid to low 8s.  But you're right, I'm better off with the Jetta. 
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.