Are Hondas worth it?

Started by BENZ BOY15, July 16, 2012, 11:03:17 PM

BENZ BOY15

Are they worth the premium they charge over the American & Korean makes?

While our Hondas have had great reliability records and are decent cars, I wonder if the Americans have caught up.

Or even if they didn't....is the rather stiff premium worth it?

Madman

Maybe at one time they were, but not anymore.
Current cars: 2015 Ford Escape SE, 2011 MINI Cooper

Formerly owned cars: 2010 Mazda 5 Sport, 2008 Audi A4 2.0T S-Line Sedan, 2003 Volkswagen Passat GL 1.8T wagon, 1998 Ford Escort SE sedan, 2001 Cadillac Catera, 2000 Volkswagen Golf GLS 2.0 5-Door, 1997 Honda Odyssey LX, 1991 Volvo 240 sedan, 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo sedan, 1987 Volvo 240 DL sedan, 1990 Peugeot 405 DL Sportswagon, 1985 Peugeot 505 Turbo sedan, 1985 Merkur XR4Ti, 1983 Renault R9 Alliance DL sedan, 1979 Chevrolet Caprice Classic wagon, 1975 Volkswagen Transporter, 1980 Fiat X-1/9 Bertone, 1979 Volkswagen Rabbit C 3-Door hatch, 1976 Ford Pinto V6 coupe, 1952 Chevrolet Styleline Deluxe sedan

"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." ~ Isaac Asimov

"I much prefer the sharpest criticism of a single intelligent man to the thoughtless approval of the masses." - Johannes Kepler

"One of the most cowardly things ordinary people do is to shut their eyes to facts." - C.S. Lewis

Soup DeVille

Quote from: BENZ BOY15 on July 16, 2012, 11:03:17 PM
Are they worth the premium they charge over the American & Korean makes?

While our Hondas have had great reliability records and are decent cars, I wonder if the Americans have caught up.

Or even if they didn't....is the rather stiff premium worth it?


An Accord over a comparable Camry or Taurus? Probably not.

An Odyssey over a Town and Country? every bit of it.
1975 Honda CB750, 1986 Rebel Rascal (sailing dinghy), 2020 Mini Cooper S, 2017 Jeanneau 349, 2020 Winnebago 31H (E450), 2021 Toyota 4Runner, 2022 Lincoln Aviator

GoCougs

The largest detriments against Honda is the incessant road noise, flinty ride, and interior rattles. These are not minor for me. However, the attention to other details is impressive; my $21k Accord was in a number of ways better (details mostly) than my $42k G37. However, the overall product is impressive. Honda got distracted with  :facepalm:  such as the Crosstour and Ridgeline, which cost them in diverting $$$ from the ho-hum "new" Civic (and from the looks of it the "new" Accord). Honda reliability is unbeatable too. So, yes, IMO they are worth it, if you can stomach the detriments. After living for ~7 years and ~150,000 miles with them in the Accord, I'm not sure I could. If in that market space again the new Camry SE V6 is a notably better vehicle in every regard.

2o6

Are Hondas really a price premium anymore?

GoCougs

I should also add Honda is behind on many technologies, such as chain-driven camshafts, DOHC drivetrains, modern VVT/L, and 6sp ATs. These haven't been bleeding edge tech for years so the "playing it safe" reasoning I often see just doesn't wash IMO.

ifcar

Quote from: 2o6 on July 16, 2012, 11:23:12 PM
Are Hondas really a price premium anymore?

Some, especially against the more basic cars in the class they're most comparable to instead of the pricey upscale ones. The Odyssey is one key example, and even the Civic is more than something like a Corolla, Sentra or Forte, if not a Focus or Jetta.

Soup DeVille

Quote from: GoCougs on July 16, 2012, 11:25:54 PM
I should also add Honda is behind on many technologies, such as chain-driven camshafts, DOHC drivetrains, modern VVT/L, and 6sp ATs. These haven't been bleeding edge tech for years so the "playing it safe" reasoning I often see just doesn't wash IMO.

They have all those things. Maybe I'm misunderstanding your point.
1975 Honda CB750, 1986 Rebel Rascal (sailing dinghy), 2020 Mini Cooper S, 2017 Jeanneau 349, 2020 Winnebago 31H (E450), 2021 Toyota 4Runner, 2022 Lincoln Aviator

GoCougs

Quote from: Soup DeVille on July 16, 2012, 11:53:37 PM
They have all those things. Maybe I'm misunderstanding your point.

True, but not exclusively. Most all automakers have almost fully transitioned to those technologies whereas Honda hasn't come close to a full transfer. The whole of their V6 line is still in the '90s with belt-driven SOHC heads. VTEC is old school in its lack of continuously variability. The 5 sp AT is still used extensively.

Soup DeVille

Quote from: GoCougs on July 17, 2012, 12:12:10 AM
True, but not exclusively. Most all automakers have almost fully transitioned to those technologies whereas Honda hasn't come close to a full transfer. The whole of their V6 line is still in the '90s with belt-driven SOHC heads. VTEC is old school in its lack of continuously variability. The 5 sp AT is still used extensively.

I've long arguesd that SOHC has distinct advantages for a lot of mid-range engines. Its kind of weird to be defending Honda in this regard though.
1975 Honda CB750, 1986 Rebel Rascal (sailing dinghy), 2020 Mini Cooper S, 2017 Jeanneau 349, 2020 Winnebago 31H (E450), 2021 Toyota 4Runner, 2022 Lincoln Aviator

sportyaccordy

Quote from: GoCougs on July 16, 2012, 11:25:54 PM
I should also add Honda is behind on many technologies, such as chain-driven camshafts, DOHC drivetrains, modern VVT/L, and 6sp ATs. These haven't been bleeding edge tech for years so the "playing it safe" reasoning I often see just doesn't wash IMO.
They dont need it, like you said yourself the J engine is competitive, as are their 4 bangers

I still think a built J would serve an NSX nicely

They have been experimenting with DSG on motorcycles but other than that, if it aint broke :huh:

veeman

On the used car market, hondas rule.  Last year, my sister in law sold her 4 banger 11 year old accord with 150 thousand miles for three grand to a used hispanic market car dealer.  While filling out the paperwork, she saw a few customers in the lot eyeing it.  If that were an 11 year old taurus, she probably would get less than a grand.

When she bought her new elantra and her fiance wanted to trade in his 10 year old jeep GC, the dealer confided that the only 10 year plus old cars with >100,000 miles on them that are worth anything on the used car market (regarding mainstreamers) are hondas, toyotas, and maybe some nissans. 

I love my 2007 leather v6 sonata with 70,000 miles and I paid as much as I would have if I bought a new cloth seat v4 accord.  But I know I can't sell my car despite whatever the blue book/grey book says for what its supposedly worth.  There's no takers.  People don't want them.  They want used accords. 

sportyaccordy

Hondas are awesome to sell but miserable to buy. So it kind of evens out. I would def look elsewhere for a used car. Nissans seem to be undervalued

2o6

Quote from: sportyaccordy on July 18, 2012, 09:17:26 AM
Hondas are awesome to sell but miserable to buy. So it kind of evens out. I would def look elsewhere for a used car. Nissans seem to be undervalued

...because they suck.

GoCougs

Quote from: Soup DeVille on July 17, 2012, 12:15:51 AM
I've long arguesd that SOHC has distinct advantages for a lot of mid-range engines. Its kind of weird to be defending Honda in this regard though.

Pretty much, only because it tends to be cheaper. The problem is (cam) independent VVT/L is not possible with SOHC.

GoCougs

Quote from: sportyaccordy on July 17, 2012, 06:00:45 AM
They dont need it, like you said yourself the J engine is competitive, as are their 4 bangers

I still think a built J would serve an NSX nicely

They have been experimenting with DSG on motorcycles but other than that, if it aint broke :huh:

Where would Honda be today if their V6s had DOHC and continuous, independent VVT/L, and 6sp ATs?

But as implied Honda ain't stupid - if they can keep older technology performing more or less at the market average, why bother? (The risk of course is if they get caught off guard and leap frog'd. Nissan's CVT technology for example.)

SVT666

Quote from: GoCougs on July 18, 2012, 04:21:47 PM
Where would Honda be today if their V6s had DOHC and continuous, independent VVT/L, and 6sp ATs?

But as implied Honda ain't stupid - if they can keep older technology performing more or less at the market average, why bother? (The risk of course is if they get caught off guard and leap frog'd. Nissan's CVT technology for example.)
You've never said that about pooprods before.

Atomic

YES  :wub: Maybe not the most exciting cars today, but far superior in most ways from personal experience with dozens owned by family. I am already experiencing separation anxiety thinking of giving up my 2006 Accord EX 4 cylinder (onced owned by my dad, now deceased). No squeaks, rattles, loose parts, etc. All of our Honda's and Acura's gave us this level of satisfaction. The '06 will be gifted to my niece once my 2013 Volvo XC60 T6 R-Design arrives. She better take good care of ths favorite! Lol, but so true...

GoCougs

Quote from: SVT666 on July 18, 2012, 04:36:23 PM
You've never said that about pooprods before.

LOL because pooprod motors aren't older technology they're ancient technology...

hotrodalex

Yet the LS7 is one of the best engines built today.

SVT666

Quote from: GoCougs on July 18, 2012, 06:32:21 PM
LOL because pooprod motors aren't older technology they're ancient technology...
The Chevy LS engines and Chrysler's HEMI are two of the best engines on the market.

GoCougs

Neither of the preceding two posts is true; by definition. If it were, most all engines would be pooprod today (and they were, once upon a time), now 98% of engines are not pooprod.

CJ

The Hemi and Chevy LS engines are still quite good, and there really is no doubting that.  I'd buy the Ford equivalent every day of the week, but the engines are durable, long-lasting, and offer excellent power.

SVT666

Quote from: CJ on July 19, 2012, 12:01:19 AM
The Hemi and Chevy LS engines are still quite good, and there really is no doubting that.  I'd buy the Ford equivalent every day of the week, but the engines are durable, long-lasting, and offer excellent power.
They're very reliable, very powerful, very good NVH, and are quite fuel efficient.

nickdrinkwater


Raza

Quote from: nickdrinkwater on July 19, 2012, 04:09:00 AM
How so?

Well, I've never really driven a Nissan I like.  They fail to excite and come wrapped in ugly sheetmetal (although the new Maxima is nice) around crappy interiors.  But the last time I looked at Nissans was years ago.  They may have gotten better, but the Juke and Murano convertible are unforgivable.  For a company that talks about paradigm shifts in all their commercials and "four door sports cars", they offer little dynamically over their competition and fall behind in reliability compared to Toyota and Honda, if I recall the last survey correctly. 
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

hotrodalex

Quote from: GoCougs on July 18, 2012, 11:58:40 PM
Neither of the preceding two posts is true; by definition. If it were, most all engines would be pooprod today (and they were, once upon a time), now 98% of engines are not pooprod.

No.

An engine is judged on its own performance, not by the competition's offerings.

sportyaccordy

Quote from: GoCougs on July 18, 2012, 04:21:47 PM
Where would Honda be today if their V6s had DOHC and continuous, independent VVT/L, and 6sp ATs?
Prob a lil less cash loaded + profitable.

Quote from: GoCougs on July 18, 2012, 04:21:47 PMBut as implied Honda ain't stupid - if they can keep older technology performing more or less at the market average, why bother? (The risk of course is if they get caught off guard and leap frog'd. Nissan's CVT technology for example.)
Lets be frank, most Honda buyers dont care about technology.

And in any case, often times the new tech doesn't pan out (Hyundai/Kia are the biggest culprits of this). Even w/a low curb weight and DI (but bewilderingly a low compression ratio) the Elantra is just not cutting the gas mileage mustard.

We are due for another leapfrog moment

sportyaccordy

Quote from: SVT666 on July 19, 2012, 12:27:06 AM
They're very reliable, very powerful, very good NVH, and are quite fuel efficient.
Incredibly compact + light as well. Are they a good fit for a luxury car, no, but who gives a shit. LSx are among the greatest modern engines out right now.

SVT666

Quote from: sportyaccordy on July 19, 2012, 09:40:22 AM
Incredibly compact + light as well. Are they a good fit for a luxury car, no, but who gives a shit. LSx are among the greatest modern engines out right now.
Why aren't they a fit for luxury cars?  Ever been in a new 300C?  Very quiet and refined.  You would never know it was a pushrod engine.