Land Rover Range Rover!

Started by 2o6, August 14, 2012, 05:10:08 PM

CJ

I just love this new Range Rover.  It's still a Range Rover and instantly recognizable as such.

MrH

Quote from: CJ on August 16, 2012, 12:00:29 AM
I'm not just saying this because I like the XC60, but I think the interior quality is better compared to the Evoque.  The interior struck me as being not as nice at the XC60 sitting next to it at the Dallas auto show.  It's also less expensive, a bigger inside, and far more powerful.  That said, the Evoque looks fucking sexual.
:facepalm:
2023 Ford Lightning Lariat ER
2019 Acura RDX SH-AWD
2023 BRZ Limited

Previous: '02 Mazda Protege5, '08 Mazda Miata, '05 Toyota Tacoma, '09 Honda Element, '13 Subaru BRZ, '14 Hyundai Genesis R-Spec 5.0, '15 Toyota 4Runner SR5, '18 Honda Accord EX-L 2.0t, '01 Honda S2000, '20 Subaru Outback XT, '23 Chevy Bolt EUV

CJ

Quote from: MrH on August 16, 2012, 12:11:39 AM
:facepalm:


Materials quality isn't as nice.  The Evoque didn't feel like a Range Rover should.

MrH

You want to try explaining what you mean by "materials quality"?
2023 Ford Lightning Lariat ER
2019 Acura RDX SH-AWD
2023 BRZ Limited

Previous: '02 Mazda Protege5, '08 Mazda Miata, '05 Toyota Tacoma, '09 Honda Element, '13 Subaru BRZ, '14 Hyundai Genesis R-Spec 5.0, '15 Toyota 4Runner SR5, '18 Honda Accord EX-L 2.0t, '01 Honda S2000, '20 Subaru Outback XT, '23 Chevy Bolt EUV

CJ

Quote from: MrH on August 16, 2012, 12:20:09 AM
You want to try explaining what you mean by "materials quality"?


I felt that some of the plastics in the Evoque weren't as soft to the touch or rich as the XC60 which, by all accounts, does actually have a very nice interior. 

MrH

:confused:  What areas are you talking about?  I can't find anywhere in the XC60 that is considered soft touch that isn't leather wrapped in the Evoque.
2023 Ford Lightning Lariat ER
2019 Acura RDX SH-AWD
2023 BRZ Limited

Previous: '02 Mazda Protege5, '08 Mazda Miata, '05 Toyota Tacoma, '09 Honda Element, '13 Subaru BRZ, '14 Hyundai Genesis R-Spec 5.0, '15 Toyota 4Runner SR5, '18 Honda Accord EX-L 2.0t, '01 Honda S2000, '20 Subaru Outback XT, '23 Chevy Bolt EUV

cawimmer430

Quote from: Galaxy on August 15, 2012, 03:17:58 PM

No, more like this:



My 5min gimping.  :lol:  I think paint would have been enough.  :mask:

Aha.  :praise:
-2018 Mercedes-Benz A250 AMG Line (W177)



WIMMER FOTOGRAFIE - Professional Automotive Photography based in Munich, Germany
www.wimmerfotografie.de
www.facebook.com/wimmerfotografie

Atomic

Quote from: MrH on August 16, 2012, 01:11:30 AM
:confused:  What areas are you talking about?  I can't find anywhere in the XC60 that is considered soft touch that isn't leather wrapped in the Evoque.

No too familiar with the Evoque, but I was astonished by the interior of my Volvo XC60.

LonghornTX

I love it, and 700lbs is ridiculous. Sign me up.
Difficult takes a day, impossible takes a week.

AltinD

Quote from: 68_427 on August 14, 2012, 08:03:07 PM
The RR Sport is also pretty small inside.  My friend's dad had one, but traded it in for a full sized RR after a month or two.

Depend what you call small. A cousin of mine have one, and I have spent a total of 9 days inside, in two vacation trips we did this and last summer

A HSE diesel V6 none the less, no clutter, no black smoke, no noice, nothing. Just awesome.

2016 KIA Sportage EX Plus, CRDI 2.0T diesel, 185 HP, AWD

sportyaccordy

#40
Ford Explorer

420lb lost! That's almost 1000lbs! It is SERIOUSLY the Ford Explorer lol.

AltinD


2016 KIA Sportage EX Plus, CRDI 2.0T diesel, 185 HP, AWD

Colonel Cadillac

If I had tons of money, I would absolutely order a new SC RR.

I have a running list of cars I would have if I had a few hundred million bucks, and the Range Rover is always on it :praise:

AltinD

it's a BIG change for them actually, both them have been G-class people for long. The Big guy has been using for a decade or so a G63 AMG custom built .... long before the G55 AMG would first come out.

Another thing I noticed, while the Big men's car is white, as his old Merc was, his son's iss light gray, just like his Merc was too

2016 KIA Sportage EX Plus, CRDI 2.0T diesel, 185 HP, AWD

TurboDan

Quote from: Colonel Cadillac on November 19, 2012, 06:03:44 PM
If I had tons of money, I would absolutely order a new SC RR.

I have a running list of cars I would have if I had a few hundred million bucks, and the Range Rover is always on it :praise:

Don't worry... you can get a Range for $25K in 4 years ;) LOL

#BritishDepreciation

Lebowski

I've seen several of these on the road now ... It's growing on me, but still not as good looking as the outgoing model IMHO.

CALL_911

Everyone touts how classy the Range Rover is. Am I the only one who does not think this is the case? I think the LR4 is classy, but not the RR.


2004 S2000
2016 340xi

Submariner

Quote from: CJ on August 16, 2012, 12:15:00 AM

Materials quality isn't as nice.  The Evoque didn't feel like a Range Rover should.

Yeah, you must be on drugs.

Everything about the Evoque feels a step or two above the XC 60.  I'm not saying the XC 60 isn't a good car, but the Evoque's build and materials is at least a notch or two above the Volvo.

Also, I briefly drove the new Range Rover yesterday.  My brief thoughts:

- I like it in white better than I thought I would, but I'm still not sure I like the sleeker, longer look over the previous model. 
- Superb inside.  It makes my moms Range Rover feel a bit cheap by comparison. 
- Not a fan of the 'slats' in the front door.  Along with an air suspension that allows for greater ride height, they relocated the air intakes allowing for greater fording depth making actual air vents on the door pointless.  I would have preferred fake intakes that looked real, or none at all. 
- Less body roll than before, and a greater sense of control.  It feels like a lifted XJ, not an SUV.  It's no sports car, though.
2010 G-550  //  2019 GLS-550

Lebowski

#48
Quote from: CALL_911 on February 01, 2013, 10:39:03 AM

Everyone touts how classy the Range Rover is. Am I the only one who does not think this is the case? I think the LR4 is classy, but not the RR.



The LR4 has increasingly become my fav in their lineup. I like the RR though, and I really like the outgoing one. I think it's the most classy of the mega-expensive SUVs.

I think LR is making some major brand management mistakes with the Range Rover name, though. RR should be reserved to their top of the line. RR Sport, ok, a bit of a stretch but I'm ok with it.  But why does the Evoque need to be the "Range Rover Evoque"?  I think it's a big mistake, and a dangerous path to go down from a branding perspective.  The hood of the Evoque even says "Range Rover", give me a break it should say "Land Rover" like the LR4.

Raza

Quote from: CALL_911 on February 01, 2013, 10:39:03 AM
Everyone touts how classy the Range Rover is. Am I the only one who does not think this is the case? I think the LR4 is classy, but not the RR.

The new RR isn't classy anymore.  The old ones were.  Even the RR Sport is classy still.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

AltinD

Who says the new RR isn't classy, hasn't seen one yet

2016 KIA Sportage EX Plus, CRDI 2.0T diesel, 185 HP, AWD

AltinD

Quote from: Submariner on February 01, 2013, 11:37:09 AM
Yeah, you must be on drugs.

Everything about the Evoque feels a step or two above the XC 60.  I'm not saying the XC 60 isn't a good car, but the Evoque's build and materials is at least a notch or two above the Volvo.

I visited the Volvo showroom some times back and was horrified on how dated all their models were, and how crappy the build quality was, even on the S80. The XC90 looked like a late-90s car. WTF :facepalm:

2016 KIA Sportage EX Plus, CRDI 2.0T diesel, 185 HP, AWD

Submariner

Quote from: AltinD on February 01, 2013, 02:32:53 PM
Who says the new RR isn't classy, hasn't seen one yet

Agreed - it looks much better in person than photos. 

Still, I think I like the outgoing model a bit more. 
2010 G-550  //  2019 GLS-550

Madman

Quote from: Lebowski on February 01, 2013, 01:21:51 PM
I think LR is making some major brand management mistakes with the Range Rover name, though. RR should be reserved to their top of the line. RR Sport, ok, a bit of a stretch but I'm ok with it.  But why does the Evoque need to be the "Range Rover Evoque"?  I think it's a big mistake, and a dangerous path to go down from a branding perspective.  The hood of the Evoque even says "Range Rover", give me a break it should say "Land Rover" like the LR4.


The original plan was for the Evoque to be called a Land Rover but, at the last minute, they changed it to Range Rover so they could justify charging a higher price.

Marketing.  Gotta love it!  :facepalm:
Current cars: 2015 Ford Escape SE, 2011 MINI Cooper

Formerly owned cars: 2010 Mazda 5 Sport, 2008 Audi A4 2.0T S-Line Sedan, 2003 Volkswagen Passat GL 1.8T wagon, 1998 Ford Escort SE sedan, 2001 Cadillac Catera, 2000 Volkswagen Golf GLS 2.0 5-Door, 1997 Honda Odyssey LX, 1991 Volvo 240 sedan, 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo sedan, 1987 Volvo 240 DL sedan, 1990 Peugeot 405 DL Sportswagon, 1985 Peugeot 505 Turbo sedan, 1985 Merkur XR4Ti, 1983 Renault R9 Alliance DL sedan, 1979 Chevrolet Caprice Classic wagon, 1975 Volkswagen Transporter, 1980 Fiat X-1/9 Bertone, 1979 Volkswagen Rabbit C 3-Door hatch, 1976 Ford Pinto V6 coupe, 1952 Chevrolet Styleline Deluxe sedan

"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." ~ Isaac Asimov

"I much prefer the sharpest criticism of a single intelligent man to the thoughtless approval of the masses." - Johannes Kepler

"One of the most cowardly things ordinary people do is to shut their eyes to facts." - C.S. Lewis

CALL_911

Quote from: AltinD on February 01, 2013, 02:35:09 PM
I visited the Volvo showroom some times back and was horrified on how dated all their models were, and how crappy the build quality was, even on the S80. The XC90 looked like a late-90s car. WTF :facepalm:

Dated, fine. Build quality? They feel like fucking vaults.


2004 S2000
2016 340xi

AltinD

Quote from: CALL_911 on February 01, 2013, 05:47:32 PM
Dated, fine. Build quality? They feel like fucking vaults.

The doors are flimpsy, like the japanese, not vault-like as the Germans. things (i.e door hinges) are welded in pure view and just painted over without even smoothing, the headliner is not seccured, on the S80 you could just pull it loose with your fingers. I was scared from what I saw

2016 KIA Sportage EX Plus, CRDI 2.0T diesel, 185 HP, AWD

Madman

Yep, Volvos aren't what they used to be.  Hence their falling sales and my current lack of enthusiasm for them.

How long before they go the way of Saab, I wonder?
Current cars: 2015 Ford Escape SE, 2011 MINI Cooper

Formerly owned cars: 2010 Mazda 5 Sport, 2008 Audi A4 2.0T S-Line Sedan, 2003 Volkswagen Passat GL 1.8T wagon, 1998 Ford Escort SE sedan, 2001 Cadillac Catera, 2000 Volkswagen Golf GLS 2.0 5-Door, 1997 Honda Odyssey LX, 1991 Volvo 240 sedan, 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo sedan, 1987 Volvo 240 DL sedan, 1990 Peugeot 405 DL Sportswagon, 1985 Peugeot 505 Turbo sedan, 1985 Merkur XR4Ti, 1983 Renault R9 Alliance DL sedan, 1979 Chevrolet Caprice Classic wagon, 1975 Volkswagen Transporter, 1980 Fiat X-1/9 Bertone, 1979 Volkswagen Rabbit C 3-Door hatch, 1976 Ford Pinto V6 coupe, 1952 Chevrolet Styleline Deluxe sedan

"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." ~ Isaac Asimov

"I much prefer the sharpest criticism of a single intelligent man to the thoughtless approval of the masses." - Johannes Kepler

"One of the most cowardly things ordinary people do is to shut their eyes to facts." - C.S. Lewis

Lebowski

Quote from: Madman on February 01, 2013, 05:31:12 PM

The original plan was for the Evoque to be called a Land Rover but, at the last minute, they changed it to Range Rover so they could justify charging a higher price.

Marketing.  Gotta love it!  :facepalm:



The thing is it's still cheaper than an LR4, which is badged a LR.  It makes no sense, and it cheapens the real RR.

CJ

Quote from: AltinD on February 02, 2013, 05:29:40 AM
The doors are flimpsy, like the japanese, not vault-like as the Germans. things (i.e door hinges) are welded in pure view and just painted over without even smoothing, the headliner is not seccured, on the S80 you could just pull it loose with your fingers. I was scared from what I saw

I'm not sure you've ever actually been in a newer Volvo.  Flimsy doors?  Buddy, time to stop drinking the Kool-Aid.

CJ

Quote from: Madman on February 02, 2013, 07:04:30 AM
Yep, Volvos aren't what they used to be.  Hence their falling sales and my current lack of enthusiasm for them.

How long before they go the way of Saab, I wonder?


Falling sales?  Have you seen the sales of the S60?  XC60?  They're doing much better in the hands of the Chinese.  Not what they used to be?  Of course not.  They're better.