Generations: Toyota Camry

Started by Vinsanity, October 24, 2012, 09:20:34 PM

The most exciting generations poll yet

1983-1986
0 (0%)
1987-1991
3 (15%)
1992-1996
7 (35%)
1997-2001
5 (25%)
2002-2006
1 (5%)
2007-2011
1 (5%)
2012-
3 (15%)

Total Members Voted: 17

Cookie Monster

Quote from: 850CSi on October 26, 2012, 04:21:01 PM
I hate Camrys because I hate all cars that are appliances (and Camry drivers in my experience tend to be the most clueless fuckers on the road), but '97-'01 is an objectively good looking car.

I was almost hit by a clueless fuck in a Camry today.
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

CJ

Can you explain why it was crap?

280Z Turbo

Madman's rants are not fueled by facts and reason.

Northlands

Quote from: 850CSi on October 26, 2012, 04:21:01 PM
I hate Camrys because I hate all cars that are appliances (and  Camry Ford F-150 and Corolla drivers in my experience tend to be the most clueless fuckers on the road), but '97-'01 is an objectively good looking car.

Fixed.



- " It's like a petting zoo, but for computers." -  my wife's take on the Apple Store.
2013 Hyundai Accent GLS / 2015 Hyundai Sonata GLS

ifcar

Quote from: Vinsanity on October 26, 2012, 03:13:17 PM
I'm silghtly partial to the '92-'96. Looking back, it seemed like it was a giant leap over the previous model in refinement and general upscale fanciness. It was a good representative of the golden age of Japanese cars.

+1

Madman

#35
Quote from: CJ on October 26, 2012, 07:56:35 PM
Can you explain why it was crap?


Leaked more oil than the Exxon Valdez and had several unexpected breakdowns.  My mother is pretty good at destroying cars but that '88 Camry didn't stand a chance!  I'm genuinely shocked her 2000 Mercury Mistake has lasted as long as it has.  Maybe she has become less hard on cars in her old age?
Current cars: 2015 Ford Escape SE, 2011 MINI Cooper

Formerly owned cars: 2010 Mazda 5 Sport, 2008 Audi A4 2.0T S-Line Sedan, 2003 Volkswagen Passat GL 1.8T wagon, 1998 Ford Escort SE sedan, 2001 Cadillac Catera, 2000 Volkswagen Golf GLS 2.0 5-Door, 1997 Honda Odyssey LX, 1991 Volvo 240 sedan, 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo sedan, 1987 Volvo 240 DL sedan, 1990 Peugeot 405 DL Sportswagon, 1985 Peugeot 505 Turbo sedan, 1985 Merkur XR4Ti, 1983 Renault R9 Alliance DL sedan, 1979 Chevrolet Caprice Classic wagon, 1975 Volkswagen Transporter, 1980 Fiat X-1/9 Bertone, 1979 Volkswagen Rabbit C 3-Door hatch, 1976 Ford Pinto V6 coupe, 1952 Chevrolet Styleline Deluxe sedan

"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." ~ Isaac Asimov

"I much prefer the sharpest criticism of a single intelligent man to the thoughtless approval of the masses." - Johannes Kepler

"One of the most cowardly things ordinary people do is to shut their eyes to facts." - C.S. Lewis

cawimmer430

-2018 Mercedes-Benz A250 AMG Line (W177)



WIMMER FOTOGRAFIE - Professional Automotive Photography based in Munich, Germany
www.wimmerfotografie.de
www.facebook.com/wimmerfotografie

Gotta-Qik-C7

Quote from: Vinsanity on October 26, 2012, 03:13:17 PM
I'm silghtly partial to the '92-'96. Looking back, it seemed like it was a giant leap over the previous model in refinement and general upscale fanciness. It was a good representative of the golden age of Japanese cars. The '97-'01 model that followed looked very plain when it was first introduced, but has arguably aged better than any other generation of Camry yet.
+1
2014 C7 Vert, 2002 Silverado, 2005 Road Glide

Soup DeVille

Quote from: GoCougs on October 25, 2012, 09:25:14 AM
Best answer in the world: because I didn't want one  ;).

OK, but all things considered that's a pretty weird factor to base your purchase decision on.
Maybe we need to start off small. I mean, they don't let you fuck the glumpers at Glumpees without a level 4 FuckPass, do they?

1975 Honda CB750, 1986 Rebel Rascal (sailing dinghy), 2015 Mini Cooper, 2020 Winnebago 31H (E450), 2021 Toyota 4Runner, 2022 Lincoln Aviator

Rupert

Novarolla-Miata-Trooper-Jeep-Volvo-Trooper-Ranger-MGB-Explorer-944-Fiat-Alfa-XTerra

13 cars, 60 cylinders, 52 manual forward gears and 9 automatic, 2 FWD, 42 doors, 1988 average year of manufacture, 3 convertibles, 22 average mpg, and no wheel covers.
PRO TENACIA NULLA VIA EST INVIA

Hachee

#40
[quote ]
I'm silghtly partial to the '92-'96. Looking back, it seemed like it was a giant leap over the previous model in refinement and general upscale fanciness. It was a good representative of the golden age of Japanese cars. The '97-'01 model that followed looked very plain when it was first introduced, but has arguably aged better than any other generation of Camry yet.

+1
[/quote]

This.  My parents had a second generation 1989 LE V6.  It was very quick and the six was very smooth, and it didn't look bad in black with the (I think) 15 inch alloys.  Seats were nice, but it felt sort of flimsy and the steering was crazy light.

They then got a third-gen, a 1993 LE V6, and it seemed light years ahead.  Super stout body (or at least if felt that way with what I believe were triple sealed doors), unbelievably quiet, very roomy, and what I thought was mini-Lexus styling (which I think still looks good today).  It was again sufficiently quick, very smooth, and the steering, while still light, was a bit meatier, and it certainly handled better than the 2nd gen.  It seemed like a tremendous car for the money.

I remember test driving a 4th gen with my dad, and he passed because it just felt inferior to the third gen.  

sportyaccordy

Quote from: CJ on October 26, 2012, 07:56:35 PM
Can you explain why it was crap?
Quote from: 280Z Turbo on October 26, 2012, 07:58:23 PM
Madman's rants are not fueled by facts and reason.
My buddy's aunt had one and my dad had one. My dad's was the All-Trac 5 spd. Cool car but I was only 5-6 when it came out. He took it up to 100 once. On the flip side my buddy's aunt's car was SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO SLLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWW. It made no damn sense how slow that car was. PRetty bad dynamically too. We all drove it.

veeman

2007-2011.

Most of the generations before it had this weird bend in the exhaust system which made it appear it would scrape the bottom of the road at the slightest provocation.

I hated that.  Whenever a camry was in front of me, my eyes were immediately drawn to it like a wart on a person's face.  It was so annoying because it seemed like such an aesthetic design flaw.  Why didn't one of the most successful companies in the world on their bread and butter american sedan spend probably less than 100 dollars to get a pipe that fit properly?

For that reason alone I thought the cars were ugly. 

Morris Minor

#43
Th 92-96 was the one that did the trick for Toyota. That set them on the all-conquering path.

Think about it. You aren't interested in cars & aspirational brands. You want a bit of space. You want inexpensive initial cost & maintenance. You want something so reliable it's ridiculous.  Camry's king.
⏤  '10 G37 | '21 CX-5 GT Reserve  ⏤
''Simplicity is Complexity Resolved'' - Constantin Brâncuși

TurboDan

Quote from: Morris Minor on November 07, 2012, 06:58:46 AM
Th 92-96 was the one that did the trick for Toyota. That set them on the all-conquering path.

Think about it. You aren't interested in cars & aspirational brands. You want a bit of space. You want inexpensive initial cost & maintenance. You want something so reliable it's ridiculous.  Camry's king.

Yeah, I remember my uncle's '94. It exuded reliability and practicality.