First Hyundai, now Ford? Fusion and C-Max Hybrids fail economy test miserably

Started by 2o6, December 07, 2012, 06:27:19 AM

2o6

CR is putting Ford on blast - C-Max Hybrid missed their hybrid claim by a whopping 9MPG.



www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/



I wonder who else is 'cheating'?


I really wonder how the average consumer drives; I often beat or match my EPA window sticker. So many people drive ignorant of fuel economy - foot always on the throttle until they come to a stop, hard acceleration, ect.

cawimmer430

I think the biggest problem with hybrids is when they're running on their conventional gasoline engines they're going to have to lug around all that extra weight all the time and in all situations.

A modern diesel car is the way to go.  :mrcool:

To me a hybrid makes sense for taxis for example that do most of their driving in the city.
-2018 Mercedes-Benz A250 AMG Line (W177)



WIMMER FOTOGRAFIE - Professional Automotive Photography based in Munich, Germany
www.wimmerfotografie.de
www.facebook.com/wimmerfotografie

2o6

Quote from: cawimmer430 on December 07, 2012, 07:17:55 AM
I think the biggest problem with hybrids is when they're running on their conventional gasoline engines they're going to have to lug around all that extra weight all the time and in all situations.

A modern diesel car is the way to go.  :mrcool:

To me a hybrid makes sense for taxis for example that do most of their driving in the city.

CR does all their vehicles in this test, most meet or beat their ratings. Hyundai was the only one who missed it, (Elantra, I think) and it only missed it by 1MPG.


Ford missed it by 9MPG.

cawimmer430

On another forum they're complaining that the CR/EPA methods for measuring/estimating gas mileage are completely outdated. Any truth to that?
-2018 Mercedes-Benz A250 AMG Line (W177)



WIMMER FOTOGRAFIE - Professional Automotive Photography based in Munich, Germany
www.wimmerfotografie.de
www.facebook.com/wimmerfotografie

Madman

Quote from: cawimmer430 on December 07, 2012, 07:24:38 AM
On another forum they're complaining that the CR/EPA methods for measuring/estimating gas mileage are completely outdated. Any truth to that?


Absolutely.  The EPA tests are inherently biased in favour of hybrids and against diesels.  Hybrid owners frequently complain they never come close to achieving the EPA's wildly inflated estimates (Witness the woman who sued Honda in small claims court because her Civic Hybrid failed to meet mileage claims) whilst diesel owners routinely achieve mileage figures well in excess of the official numbers.

The ignorant masses who simply look at the rigged EPA estimates and don't investigate any further will naturally plonk their cash down for the hybrid instead of the diesel.  Those who actually bother to calculate their fuel consumption (most don't) will inevitably be disappointed when they learn their hybrid isn't the fuel sipping miser they were fraudulently lead to believe.
Current cars: 2015 Ford Escape SE, 2011 MINI Cooper

Formerly owned cars: 2010 Mazda 5 Sport, 2008 Audi A4 2.0T S-Line Sedan, 2003 Volkswagen Passat GL 1.8T wagon, 1998 Ford Escort SE sedan, 2001 Cadillac Catera, 2000 Volkswagen Golf GLS 2.0 5-Door, 1997 Honda Odyssey LX, 1991 Volvo 240 sedan, 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo sedan, 1987 Volvo 240 DL sedan, 1990 Peugeot 405 DL Sportswagon, 1985 Peugeot 505 Turbo sedan, 1985 Merkur XR4Ti, 1983 Renault R9 Alliance DL sedan, 1979 Chevrolet Caprice Classic wagon, 1975 Volkswagen Transporter, 1980 Fiat X-1/9 Bertone, 1979 Volkswagen Rabbit C 3-Door hatch, 1976 Ford Pinto V6 coupe, 1952 Chevrolet Styleline Deluxe sedan

"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." ~ Isaac Asimov

"I much prefer the sharpest criticism of a single intelligent man to the thoughtless approval of the masses." - Johannes Kepler

"One of the most cowardly things ordinary people do is to shut their eyes to facts." - C.S. Lewis

2o6

Quote from: Madman on December 07, 2012, 07:58:43 AM

Absolutely.  The EPA tests are inherently biased in favour of hybrids and against diesels.  Hybrid owners frequently complain they never come close to achieving the EPA's wildly inflated estimates (Witness the woman who sued Honda in small claims court because her Civic Hybrid failed to meet mileage claims) whilst diesel owners routinely achieve mileage figures well in excess of the official numbers.

The ignorant masses who simply look at the rigged EPA estimates and don't investigate any further will naturally plonk their cash down for the hybrid instead of the diesel.  Those who actually bother to calculate their fuel consumption (most don't) will inevitably be disappointed when they learn their hybrid isn't the fuel sipping miser they were fraudulently lead to believe.


This is false.

SVT666

Quote from: Madman on December 07, 2012, 07:58:43 AM

Absolutely.  The EPA tests are inherently biased in favour of hybrids and against diesels.  Hybrid owners frequently complain they never come close to achieving the EPA's wildly inflated estimates (Witness the woman who sued Honda in small claims court because her Civic Hybrid failed to meet mileage claims) whilst diesel owners routinely achieve mileage figures well in excess of the official numbers.
You really have no fucking clue.  That woman sued Honda because Honda updated her Civic with a new ECU tune that changed the points at which the gasoline engine would start.  This caused the car to use more fuel than it was originally intended to.

sportyaccordy

I dont know, Madman's grandiose platitudes are pretty convincing to me

AutobahnSHO

Will

cawimmer430

Quote from: Madman on December 07, 2012, 07:58:43 AM

Absolutely.  The EPA tests are inherently biased in favour of hybrids and against diesels.  Hybrid owners frequently complain they never come close to achieving the EPA's wildly inflated estimates (Witness the woman who sued Honda in small claims court because her Civic Hybrid failed to meet mileage claims) whilst diesel owners routinely achieve mileage figures well in excess of the official numbers.

The ignorant masses who simply look at the rigged EPA estimates and don't investigate any further will naturally plonk their cash down for the hybrid instead of the diesel.  Those who actually bother to calculate their fuel consumption (most don't) will inevitably be disappointed when they learn their hybrid isn't the fuel sipping miser they were fraudulently lead to believe.


Cool.

Sucks that so few diesels are available in the US. You guys are MISSING OUT! You could be driving a diesel-powered Cadillac Cat...Opel Omega! :lol:
-2018 Mercedes-Benz A250 AMG Line (W177)



WIMMER FOTOGRAFIE - Professional Automotive Photography based in Munich, Germany
www.wimmerfotografie.de
www.facebook.com/wimmerfotografie

Madman

Quote from: 2o6 on December 07, 2012, 08:51:33 AM
This is false.


Then explain why their are so many hybrid owners out there who are disappointed with their car's mileage.  At the same time, practically every diesel owner I hear from are thrilled about how their cars get better mileage than expected.  The only logical explanation is the EPA tests are either flawed or deliberately biased.

The EPA itself admitted it's own fuel economy ratings for hybrids were grossly exaggerated when, in 2008, it drastically cut the ratings for all hybrid models by anywhere from 12 to 30 per cent.

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/fuel-efficiency/fuel-economy/2008-epa-fuel-economy-rating3.htm

Even though EPA's revised figures aren't as wildly optimistic as before, they are still virtually unobtainable by actual owners driving their cars in real-world conditions.
Current cars: 2015 Ford Escape SE, 2011 MINI Cooper

Formerly owned cars: 2010 Mazda 5 Sport, 2008 Audi A4 2.0T S-Line Sedan, 2003 Volkswagen Passat GL 1.8T wagon, 1998 Ford Escort SE sedan, 2001 Cadillac Catera, 2000 Volkswagen Golf GLS 2.0 5-Door, 1997 Honda Odyssey LX, 1991 Volvo 240 sedan, 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo sedan, 1987 Volvo 240 DL sedan, 1990 Peugeot 405 DL Sportswagon, 1985 Peugeot 505 Turbo sedan, 1985 Merkur XR4Ti, 1983 Renault R9 Alliance DL sedan, 1979 Chevrolet Caprice Classic wagon, 1975 Volkswagen Transporter, 1980 Fiat X-1/9 Bertone, 1979 Volkswagen Rabbit C 3-Door hatch, 1976 Ford Pinto V6 coupe, 1952 Chevrolet Styleline Deluxe sedan

"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." ~ Isaac Asimov

"I much prefer the sharpest criticism of a single intelligent man to the thoughtless approval of the masses." - Johannes Kepler

"One of the most cowardly things ordinary people do is to shut their eyes to facts." - C.S. Lewis

Madman

Quote from: cawimmer430 on December 07, 2012, 05:16:10 PM
Cool.

Sucks that so few diesels are available in the US. You guys are MISSING OUT! You could be driving a diesel-powered Cadillac Cat...Opel Omega! :lol:


I'd love to have an Omega Turbodiesel!!!  If there is one thing I would change about my Caterror, I'd wish the fuel economy were a bit better.  Although it's about what I expected it to be, fewer visits to the pump are always welcome.
Current cars: 2015 Ford Escape SE, 2011 MINI Cooper

Formerly owned cars: 2010 Mazda 5 Sport, 2008 Audi A4 2.0T S-Line Sedan, 2003 Volkswagen Passat GL 1.8T wagon, 1998 Ford Escort SE sedan, 2001 Cadillac Catera, 2000 Volkswagen Golf GLS 2.0 5-Door, 1997 Honda Odyssey LX, 1991 Volvo 240 sedan, 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo sedan, 1987 Volvo 240 DL sedan, 1990 Peugeot 405 DL Sportswagon, 1985 Peugeot 505 Turbo sedan, 1985 Merkur XR4Ti, 1983 Renault R9 Alliance DL sedan, 1979 Chevrolet Caprice Classic wagon, 1975 Volkswagen Transporter, 1980 Fiat X-1/9 Bertone, 1979 Volkswagen Rabbit C 3-Door hatch, 1976 Ford Pinto V6 coupe, 1952 Chevrolet Styleline Deluxe sedan

"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." ~ Isaac Asimov

"I much prefer the sharpest criticism of a single intelligent man to the thoughtless approval of the masses." - Johannes Kepler

"One of the most cowardly things ordinary people do is to shut their eyes to facts." - C.S. Lewis

2o6

Quote from: Madman on December 07, 2012, 06:27:07 PM

Then explain why their are so many hybrid owners out there who are disappointed with their car's mileage.  At the same time, practically every diesel owner I hear from are thrilled about how their cars get better mileage than expected.  The only logical explanation is the EPA tests are either flawed or deliberately biased.

The EPA itself admitted it's own fuel economy ratings for hybrids were grossly exaggerated when, in 2008, it drastically cut the ratings for all hybrid models by anywhere from 12 to 30 per cent.

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/fuel-efficiency/fuel-economy/2008-epa-fuel-economy-rating3.htm

Even though EPA's revised figures aren't as wildly optimistic as before, they are still virtually unobtainable by actual owners driving their cars in real-world conditions.


Because you don't understand how Hybrids work and how they excel in the city, but suffer on the freeway. It takes advantage of the EPA's test not deliberately; there are long periods of the test where the car is stopped and idling. Hybrids (more specifically, Toyota Hybrids) don't idle; they are shut off, and for a lot of speed, (like, under 30MPH) the car is electric and doesn't use any fuel. Freeway driving can't take advantage of the electric motor as much, so fuel economy isn't as good.

Diesels are the opposite.

SVT666

Exactly.  If your commute is mostly highway, your mileage in a Hybrid isn't going to come anywhere near the EPA claims.

r0tor

2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee No Speed -- 2004 Mazda RX8 6 speed -- 2018 Alfa Romeo Giulia All Speed

cawimmer430

Quote from: Madman on December 07, 2012, 06:35:56 PM
I'd love to have an Omega Turbodiesel!!!  If there is one thing I would change about my Caterror, I'd wish the fuel economy were a bit better.  Although it's about what I expected it to be, fewer visits to the pump are always welcome.

The next time you win the lottery you can always import an Opel Omega Turbodiesel for your driving pleasure.  :praise:
-2018 Mercedes-Benz A250 AMG Line (W177)



WIMMER FOTOGRAFIE - Professional Automotive Photography based in Munich, Germany
www.wimmerfotografie.de
www.facebook.com/wimmerfotografie

Atomic

I read about Ford's 9-10 MPG spread and that high of an "error" seems more than coincidental. It is especially appalling for a hybrid and the green factor these companies are trying to promote. It's alarming for Ford if the claims of deception are true after a bad week or more of MY13 Fusion (in particular) and Escape factory recalls (including potential for fires) and disappointing sales of its redesigned sedan, despite $1,000 rebates and other hefty incentives to move them. The culmination effect is not good for business or any new vehicle's reputation.

Autobahn

Quote from: cawimmer430 on December 09, 2012, 04:02:31 AM
The next time you win the lottery you can always import an Opel Omega Turbodiesel for your driving pleasure.  :praise:

... funny thing is, the Omega was long available with a BMW diesel engine :lol: - real driving pleasure

r0tor

Hybrid fuel mileage is incredibly variable and impossible to have a one size fits all number.  If your buying a hybrid do as my parents did and force the dealership into an overnight test drive where you can take it on your daily driving routes and see what it will do for you.
2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee No Speed -- 2004 Mazda RX8 6 speed -- 2018 Alfa Romeo Giulia All Speed

MX793

Until someone can show that Ford falsified data or cheated the EPA test, blame the EPA's testing methodology and not Ford if real world mileage and EPA mileage do not match.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

2o6

Quote from: MX793 on December 09, 2012, 09:07:44 AM
Until someone can show that Ford falsified data or cheated the EPA test, blame the EPA's testing methodology and not Ford if real world mileage and EPA mileage do not match.

I said it when Hyundai's scandal broke, I wonder if more manufacturers aren't 'cheating'.

MX793

Quote from: 2o6 on December 09, 2012, 10:49:19 AM
I said it when Hyundai's scandal broke, I wonder if more manufacturers aren't 'cheating'.

IIRC, Prius's real world mileage misses EPA numbers by a fair bit as well.  Toyota even wanted to advertise their own, lower mileage estimates and the EPA told them they could not.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

2o6

Quote from: MX793 on December 09, 2012, 10:57:51 AM
IIRC, Prius's real world mileage misses EPA numbers by a fair bit as well.  Toyota even wanted to advertise their own, lower mileage estimates and the EPA told them they could not.

I think too many consumers are uninformed about how things work. Hybrids like the Prius and Volt (especially Volt) vary so wildly due to driving style and driving use. My commute is a short freeway sprint, something like a Prius would be totally wasted on me. However, if my commute was more stop and go, a Prius or Volt would be perfect for me.

SVT666

The Volt is perfect for most every commute.   Too bad it's so damn expensive to begin with.

Eye of the Tiger

Quote from: SVT666 on December 09, 2012, 11:30:32 AM
The Volt is perfect for most every commute.   Too bad it's so damn expensive to begin with.

And too bad you can't fit a gun rack in the back :huh:
2008 TUNDRA (Truck Ultra-wideband Never-say-die Daddy Rottweiler Awesome)

sparkplug

if you inflate you tires 20 psi above recommend you're sure to get better gas mileage... until you're tires explode.
Getting stoned, one stone at a time.