C7 Corvette

Started by Cookie Monster, December 29, 2012, 11:09:40 PM

SVT666


Laconian

Overall it's quite nice. Looks best from the front!
Kia EV6 GT-Line / MX-5 RF 6MT

MX793

There's just something odd about a Corvette with C-pillars.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

Payman

I'm in love with the whole package, rear end included. I have a new 3 year plan to buy an off-lease '14.

SVT666

The more I look at the rear the more it bugs me.  I still love the rest of it though.

280Z Turbo

Quote from: MX793 on January 13, 2013, 08:28:55 PM
There's just something odd about a Corvette with C-pillars.

Does this count?


CALL_911

I'm a fan, but I like the C6 more.


2004 S2000
2016 340xi

Raza

Quote from: 68_427 on January 13, 2013, 06:21:33 PM


I understand what they were going for, but interiors designed like this almost always lack flow and this is no exception.  It's very visually unappealing, like they designed the interior and then said "Oh shit, we have to put another chair next to this one...let's just tack it on." 
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

MrH

:huh:

I love how driver centric it is.  The passenger's temperature isn't even in the center stack, but instead on the passenger air vent.  Why?  Because fuck having passengers :lol:
2023 Ford Lightning Lariat ER
2019 Acura RDX SH-AWD
2023 BRZ Limited

Previous: '02 Mazda Protege5, '08 Mazda Miata, '05 Toyota Tacoma, '09 Honda Element, '13 Subaru BRZ, '14 Hyundai Genesis R-Spec 5.0, '15 Toyota 4Runner SR5, '18 Honda Accord EX-L 2.0t, '01 Honda S2000, '20 Subaru Outback XT, '23 Chevy Bolt EUV

2o6

I don't know how I feel about it.

SVT666

Quote from: Raza  on January 13, 2013, 09:30:48 PM
I understand what they were going for, but interiors designed like this almost always lack flow and this is no exception.  It's very visually unappealing, like they designed the interior and then said "Oh shit, we have to put another chair next to this one...let's just tack it on."
I dig that.  The driver's side of the dash should be totally driver centric...and I really do love how the passenger's HVAC controls on his/her side.

Raza

Quote from: MrH on January 13, 2013, 09:32:15 PM
:huh:

I love how driver centric it is.  The passenger's temperature isn't even in the center stack, but instead on the passenger air vent.  Why?  Because fuck having passengers :lol:

Yeah, but it looks terrible.  Not feng shui at all.  No flow.  Soft touch blah blah blah, but it's not nice to look at in the pictures, anyway. 

Also, count me in the minority that doesn't like this much.  It's too "car of the future" instead of "car".  It looks like something out of Minority Report.  Great profile, but I'm not convinced by the front or the rear. 
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

2o6

I think it's the greenhouse that's bothering me so much.

Raza

Quote from: SVT666 on January 13, 2013, 09:37:18 PM
I dig that.  The driver's side of the dash should be totally driver centric...and I really do love how the passenger's HVAC controls on his/her side.

Why not just go all the way and wall off the passenger from the driver completely? 
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

SVT666

Quote from: Raza  on January 13, 2013, 09:39:07 PM
Why not just go all the way and wall off the passenger from the driver completely?
That would be fucking cool.  In a car like that I think I would kinda like to feel like I'm in the cockpit of a fighter jet.

2o6

It's too blocky; I wish some of those hard edges were smoothed out. I think the C6 is a better design.

Raza

Quote from: SVT666 on January 13, 2013, 09:40:48 PM
That would be fucking cool.  In a car like that I think I would kinda like to feel like I'm in the cockpit of a fighter jet.

Well there you go.  Do not applaud half measures. 
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

SVT666

I think the rear wouldn't bother me so much if the lower "black" half was body colour.  The rear is really starting to turn me off, but the rest of the car is looking better and better...even the hood vent that I so dearly wanted to hide.  All of the car looks great, but the rear end ruins it for me...luckily only the losers would see it.

LonghornTX

Not a huge fan of the exterior. The headlights look the same as those on the Viper, the hood vent is kind of strange and the rear is just ugly. I am also not in love with them using the Stingray name again, or the that badge. The side looks really nice though and I like the driver centric interior. I am sure it will be a demon performance wise.
Difficult takes a day, impossible takes a week.

93JC


LonghornTX

Quote from: 93JC on January 13, 2013, 10:03:54 PM
I like the badge. :huh:
First LT1, now Stingray...Makes me think GM is running short on inspiration. The original Stingray didn't need a stupid badge...its designers took inspiration from the animal and it showed in the design.
Difficult takes a day, impossible takes a week.

280Z Turbo

Quote from: LonghornTX on January 13, 2013, 10:12:46 PM
First LT1, now Stingray...Makes me think GM is running short on inspiration. The original Stingray didn't need a stupid badge...its designers took inspiration from the animal and it showed in the design.

It did have badges. Two of them, in fact. One above the RH tail lamps and one on the glove box door.

LonghornTX

Quote from: 280Z Turbo on January 13, 2013, 10:24:28 PM
It did have badges. Two of them, in fact. One above the RH tail lamps and one on the glove box door.
I meant in the shape of a stingray. The old ones were just words
Difficult takes a day, impossible takes a week.

GoCougs

Quote from: LonghornTX on January 13, 2013, 10:02:21 PM
Not a huge fan of the exterior. The headlights look the same as those on the Viper, the hood vent is kind of strange and the rear is just ugly. I am also not in love with them using the Stingray name again, or the that badge. The side looks really nice though and I like the driver centric interior. I am sure it will be a demon performance wise.

With a car this good there was no shortage of anything. "Stingray" was a good call. Most know it's a Corvette moniker yet it hasn't been used in many years. I would have preferred the original "Sting Ray" usage however.  "LT1" goes back many years too.

Gotta-Qik-C7

Quote from: SVT666 on January 13, 2013, 09:45:23 PM
...even the hood vent that I so dearly wanted to hide.
Quote from: LonghornTX on January 13, 2013, 10:02:21 PM
the hood vent is kind of strange and the rear is just ugly.
The hood vent is no worse than the one you guys love on the GT500..........
2014 C7 Vert, 2002 Silverado, 2005 Road Glide

LonghornTX

Quote from: Gotta-Qik-G8 on January 13, 2013, 10:38:03 PM
The hood vent is no worse than the one you guys love on the GT500..........
Who said we love the one on the GT500? I am not in love with it, though it seems to fit much better than this one.
Difficult takes a day, impossible takes a week.

Gotta-Qik-C7

Quote from: 2o6 on January 13, 2013, 09:41:23 PM
It's too blocky; I wish some of those hard edges were smoothed out. I think the C6 is a better design.
The Corvette has had "soft" edges since 1984. Time for a change!
2014 C7 Vert, 2002 Silverado, 2005 Road Glide

Gotta-Qik-C7

Quote from: LonghornTX on January 13, 2013, 10:40:44 PM
Who said we love the one on the GT500? I am not in love with it, though it seems to fit much better than this one.
I've never seen you complain about the one on the GT500 either. And it doesn't fit any better than the one on the C7.
2014 C7 Vert, 2002 Silverado, 2005 Road Glide

GoCougs

Versus the C6 the C7 is 100 lbs lighter, has VVT, ~20 more hp and likely more aggressive gearing. I'm going with:

0-40 in 3.9 sec
1/4 mile in 12.1 sec @ 117 mph

SVT666

Quote from: Gotta-Qik-G8 on January 13, 2013, 10:38:03 PM
The hood vent is no worse than the one you guys love on the GT500..........
The one in the previous gen GT500 was terrible.  The one in the new GT500 definitely works better than the one on the Vette even though I'm still not crazy about it.