Unecessary Styling "Trends"

Started by AutobahnSHO, May 25, 2013, 06:19:52 PM

Soup DeVille

Quote from: hotrodalex on May 26, 2013, 10:59:40 PM
I do miss the days of skinny A-pillars. Could have hit a pedestrian in a crosswalk a couple of weeks ago because he was completely covered by the pillar (this was in my BMW.)

The a-pillar can be justified under the guise of rollover protection (and probably occupant)- but the rear view mirror thing bugs me.

I don't need any stupid Onstar buttons on my mirror, I want a mirror- a frameless one preferably shaped like the rear window, not a universal rectangular one that kind of works well for most backlights.
Maybe we need to start off small. I mean, they don't let you fuck the glumpers at Glumpees without a level 4 FuckPass, do they?

1975 Honda CB750, 1986 Rebel Rascal (sailing dinghy), 2015 Mini Cooper, 2020 Winnebago 31H (E450), 2021 Toyota 4Runner, 2022 Lincoln Aviator

MX793

#31
Quote from: 280Z Turbo on May 26, 2013, 09:56:21 PM
Oversized wheels are a huge problem. Reducing sidewall height has diminishing gains and eventually the sidewall stiffness creates too much harshness for street use. The extra unsprung weight also adversely affects handling.

I'm not saying we should go back to the days of 70 series sidewalls (they looked bad and handled worse) but roads in the north are too shitty for rubber band tires.

As wheels are getting bigger, so are the overall diameters of the tires to maintain some minimal sidewall height (aftermarket jumbo wheel trend excluded) to protect rims from damage and preserve ride quality.  My Mazda came from the factory with 205/50R17 tires, which equates to a 4" sidewall.  The largest wheels available on my Mustang are 19" shod with 255/40R19, which equates to... a 4" sidewall.  My old 240SX with 195/60R15s had a 4.6" sidewall.  That's about the same as with the optional 18" wheels on the Mustang (and what I have on the car now) or the standard 16" tires that would have come on my Mazda (which my snow tires are).  Looking back at the mid-90s SN95 Mustang, the optional, "big" 17" wheels got you a tire with a 4.3" sidewall.  A bit lower than the current 18s.  So despite the trend towards jumbo wheels over the past 8-10 years, sidewalls really aren't that much shorter than they were even going back nearly 20 years ago.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

Cookie Monster

If automakers lowered beltlines, not only would it make it easier to put your arm on the sill and have the cabin be airier with better visibility, but wheel wells could also be made smaller and you could have smaller wheels and tires, too. High beltlines with small wheels and tires makes the car look very top heavy.
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

AutobahnSHO

Quote from: 280Z Turbo on May 26, 2013, 10:17:02 PM
At this point we might as well have button shifters with flappy paddles if you're feeling sporty whilst driving your Toyota Sienna. Fill the shifter space with 4 more cup holders or something.

+1.   Seriously.

The shifter on the steering column used to be because it was physically necessary. Nowadays the computer is doing all the shifting anyway, so it's just a "comfort stick"..
Will

hotrodalex

Quote from: thecarnut on May 27, 2013, 10:24:05 AM
If automakers lowered beltlines, not only would it make it easier to put your arm on the sill and have the cabin be airier with better visibility, but wheel wells could also be made smaller and you could have smaller wheels and tires, too. High beltlines with small wheels and tires makes the car look very top heavy.

The Camaro's windowsill is actually at an almost perfect height for my elbow... Most of the time the problem I have with that is the seat being too far away from the door to be comfortable.

I do agree about the slabsidedness making the styling awkward and continuing the unnecessary larger-and-larger wheel trend.

12,000 RPM

Quote from: Rupert on May 25, 2013, 07:32:59 PM
I dunno. Sometimes with the all-red signals, I get confused when the left one blinks. Looks like they're gonna turn right.
Its real bad when you have someone who likes to ride the brakes, and there is only 1 bulb for everything. It looks like they are switching the turn stalk from left to right.
Protecctor of the Atmospheric Engine #TheyLiedToUs

cawimmer430

If I wrote this article, my number one complaint would the "boring aerodynamic design" we have today.

Bring back '70s car design!!!  :devil:
-2018 Mercedes-Benz A250 AMG Line (W177)



WIMMER FOTOGRAFIE - Professional Automotive Photography based in Munich, Germany
www.wimmerfotografie.de
www.facebook.com/wimmerfotografie

Madman

Quote from: cawimmer430 on May 27, 2013, 12:37:21 PM
If I wrote this article, my number one complaint would the "boring aerodynamic design" we have today.

Bring back '70s car design!!!  :devil:

Look-alike cars are nothing new.



Current cars: 2015 Ford Escape SE, 2011 MINI Cooper

Formerly owned cars: 2010 Mazda 5 Sport, 2008 Audi A4 2.0T S-Line Sedan, 2003 Volkswagen Passat GL 1.8T wagon, 1998 Ford Escort SE sedan, 2001 Cadillac Catera, 2000 Volkswagen Golf GLS 2.0 5-Door, 1997 Honda Odyssey LX, 1991 Volvo 240 sedan, 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo sedan, 1987 Volvo 240 DL sedan, 1990 Peugeot 405 DL Sportswagon, 1985 Peugeot 505 Turbo sedan, 1985 Merkur XR4Ti, 1983 Renault R9 Alliance DL sedan, 1979 Chevrolet Caprice Classic wagon, 1975 Volkswagen Transporter, 1980 Fiat X-1/9 Bertone, 1979 Volkswagen Rabbit C 3-Door hatch, 1976 Ford Pinto V6 coupe, 1952 Chevrolet Styleline Deluxe sedan

"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." ~ Isaac Asimov

"I much prefer the sharpest criticism of a single intelligent man to the thoughtless approval of the masses." - Johannes Kepler

"One of the most cowardly things ordinary people do is to shut their eyes to facts." - C.S. Lewis

NomisR

Quote from: Soup DeVille on May 25, 2013, 06:24:53 PM
I'm not sure I like the idea of removing the gear selector and giving me a fiddly knob. I get the point, but: do we really need to squeeze in an extra cupholder that badly?

Also, the "big grilles" are in part a response to pedestrian crash standards which have raised the hoodline, and well: you've got to do something with that bulbous front end.

Why do we need a pedestrian crash standard?  Are people stepping out in front of cars that often that we actually need one? 

Morris Minor

They touched on my little pet peeve of drivers riding "lights-out" at night because their gauges are illuminated. It needs to be fixed.
⏤  '10 G37 | '21 CX-5 GT Reserve  ⏤
''Simplicity is Complexity Resolved'' - Constantin Brâncuși

NomisR

Quote from: Soup DeVille on May 26, 2013, 10:56:40 PM
High sills don't bother me half as much as the thickness of modern A-pillars: but between those, the high sills, the smaller rear view due to all the rear passenger headrests, the extra large rear view mirror with the extra buttons on them, and the higher hoodlines of cars these days, there's something of a visibility problem altogether on most new cars.

I think part of the reason for the high door sills is the side impact standards today with the higher number of cars being so high off the ground.  My RSX was pretty high off the ground IMO, but 99% of the cars made today has a higher roof line than my RSX.  And our RDX, a lot of the sedans today have the roof lines just as high as that damn thing. 

And I noticed with the auto off headlights, asshole as driving around in the day time with their high beams on now because they keep it on all the time in the first place and then when they get in their cars, their headlight turns on so they blind everyone all the time. 

And then there's those that don't turn on their headlights at night that are just as bad because they think that the interior lights are on, so their lights are on.  I mostly see them in Toyota drivers and Mustangs...

Soup DeVille

Quote from: NomisR on May 28, 2013, 11:03:00 AM
Why do we need a pedestrian crash standard?  Are people stepping out in front of cars that often that we actually need one? 

"If it saves only one life..."
Maybe we need to start off small. I mean, they don't let you fuck the glumpers at Glumpees without a level 4 FuckPass, do they?

1975 Honda CB750, 1986 Rebel Rascal (sailing dinghy), 2015 Mini Cooper, 2020 Winnebago 31H (E450), 2021 Toyota 4Runner, 2022 Lincoln Aviator

Vinsanity

Quote from: hotrodalex on May 26, 2013, 10:59:40 PM
I do miss the days of skinny A-pillars. Could have hit a pedestrian in a crosswalk a couple of weeks ago because he was completely covered by the pillar (this was in my BMW.)

In typical modern GM vein, my A-pillars are about as thick as Brock Lesnar's neck, but it hasn't been an issue for me until this past weekend when I took a backroad shortcut to/from a friend's house out in the canyon. Going through a series of hairpins, the driver-side pillar is right in the middle of where you should be looking when you approach a left-hander. Frustrating and a little scary. Also, the next day, the passenger-side A-pillar managed to hide a Chevy Equinox for a split second when I was waiting to make a left turn onto a neighborhood road.

Raza

Quote from: NomisR on May 28, 2013, 01:39:09 PM
I think part of the reason for the high door sills is the side impact standards today with the higher number of cars being so high off the ground.  My RSX was pretty high off the ground IMO, but 99% of the cars made today has a higher roof line than my RSX.  And our RDX, a lot of the sedans today have the roof lines just as high as that damn thing. 

The roof of my car goes up to the windowline on most modern cars.  I hope they keep getting higher and taller, so my car can just slip underneath them and I'll never have to worry about getting rear ended again. 
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

NomisR

Quote from: Soup DeVille on May 28, 2013, 01:57:38 PM
"If it saves only one life..."

I want pointy front end so I can spear some asshole that tries to movie stunt my car. 

But seriously, if pedestrians would stop fucking jay walking, we wouldn't have problems with them getting run over.. how about using the fucking crosswalks and look where you're going!!!

NomisR

Quote from: Raza  on May 28, 2013, 02:05:48 PM
The roof of my car goes up to the windowline on most modern cars.  I hope they keep getting higher and taller, so my car can just slip underneath them and I'll never have to worry about getting rear ended again. 


My Elise can almost do that..

Raza

Quote from: NomisR on May 28, 2013, 04:27:20 PM
My Elise can almost do that..

There's a tollbooth-style gate at the entrance and exit of my garage at work.  I keep thinking "man, if it were only 3 inches higher, I wouldn't have to fumble with my ID everyday to get in and out. 
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

Cookie Monster

Quote from: Raza  on May 29, 2013, 08:11:11 AM
There's a tollbooth-style gate at the entrance and exit of my garage at work.  I keep thinking "man, if it were only 3 inches higher, I wouldn't have to fumble with my ID everyday to get in and out. 


So drop your car 3 inches. :huh: :lol:
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

ChrisV

#48
Quote from: Soup DeVille on May 26, 2013, 10:56:40 PM
High sills don't bother me half as much as the thickness of modern A-pillars:

I have to agree with you there. Thick A pillars are a real pain. It's the one area that I have a complaint about driving the Volt, things can hide in the driver's side A pillar area, especially people crossing the street from the left.

Had the same problem with the Vauxhaull Astra I drove in Scotland last week. Made it much harder to place the car properly on those narrow streets when I couldn't see things hidden by the A pillars.
Like a fine Detroit wine, this vehicle has aged to budgetary perfection...

Raza

Quote from: thecarnut on May 29, 2013, 08:37:02 AM
So drop your car 3 inches. :huh: :lol:

Unless they lower the ground, I don't think that's possible!
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

Cookie Monster

Quote from: Raza  on May 29, 2013, 10:39:02 AM
Unless they lower the ground, I don't think that's possible!

Pussy
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

2o6

Quote from: thecarnut on May 27, 2013, 10:24:05 AM
If automakers lowered beltlines, not only would it make it easier to put your arm on the sill and have the cabin be airier with better visibility, but wheel wells could also be made smaller and you could have smaller wheels and tires, too. High beltlines with small wheels and tires makes the car look very top heavy.

New cars take a shit on old cars in terms of ergonomics. I am reminded of this whenever I drive a car from two or three generations ago versus my car. Mine is simply much more accomidating.


And big wheels are nothing new. Old cars suck.