MAZDA SkyActiv-R Sportscar... New RX-7?

Started by Payman, September 30, 2015, 08:13:39 AM

Payman

Quote from: thecarnut on October 27, 2015, 11:29:18 AM
I dunno, wasn't the RX-7 like $50k back in the '90's? I'd realistically expect this thing to be at least $50k.

So was the 300ZX and Supra... all were optimistically overpriced and the entire segment died by the mid-90s as a result. The resurrection began with the 350Z being reborn in the early 00s with a $15K lower starting point.

12,000 RPM

Quote from: MX793 on October 27, 2015, 11:30:20 AM
Issues with implementing on a Wankel:
1. No valves normally in the design to seal off the rotor chamber
2. Rotaries rely on oil mixed with incoming fuel for lubricating the apex seals.  If you shut off the rotor, where does the lubrication come from?
O boy. Things are coming into focus now. I was going to say, OK, just collect the oil, but I'm guessing it goes right out the tailpipe.... hence the high oil consumption and emissions. Maybe they have gone to roller bearings for apex seals? IDK man.

Quote from: Rockraven on October 27, 2015, 11:35:34 AM
So was the 300ZX and Supra... all were optimistically overpriced and the entire segment died by the mid-90s as a result. The resurrection began with the 350Z being reborn in the early 00s with a $15K lower starting point.
They weren't that overpriced when they came out. What sent their prices into orbit was the crash of the yen. Same thing happened in Germany. That is why Japanese and German cars got so decontented and under-engineered during the late 90s. These cars were brought on by bubbles. ~83-95 was a mega anomaly in the auto world... we probably got about 20-30 years worth of development over that period.

In any case, I too see this thing being in the high 40s low 50s. Mid to high 30s is ambitious considering the hella conventional Miata hits the low 30s, with a Mazda 3 base engine and like no sound insulation lol. They will probably aim just enough to cover some of its R&D, which will mean pricing will be ambitious enough to be profitable at low volume.
Protecctor of the Atmospheric Engine #TheyLiedToUs

Payman

Quote from: 12,000 RPM on October 27, 2015, 11:48:14 AM
O boy. Things are coming into focus now. I was going to say, OK, just collect the oil, but I'm guessing it goes right out the tailpipe.... hence the high oil consumption and emissions. Maybe they have gone to roller bearings for apex seals? IDK man.
They weren't that overpriced when they came out. What sent their prices into orbit was the crash of the yen. Same thing happened in Germany. That is why Japanese and German cars got so decontented and under-engineered during the late 90s. These cars were brought on by bubbles. ~83-95 was a mega anomaly in the auto world... we probably got about 20-30 years worth of development over that period.

In any case, I too see this thing being in the high 40s low 50s. Mid to high 30s is ambitious considering the hella conventional Miata hits the low 30s, with a Mazda 3 base engine and like no sound insulation lol. They will probably aim just enough to cover some of its R&D, which will mean pricing will be ambitious enough to be profitable at low volume.

Good points.

Cookie Monster

Quote from: Rockraven on October 27, 2015, 11:35:34 AM
So was the 300ZX and Supra... all were optimistically overpriced and the entire segment died by the mid-90s as a result. The resurrection began with the 350Z being reborn in the early 00s with a $15K lower starting point.

Except that the 350Z came out 7 years after the 300ZX was discontinued in the US ('96-'03), so not a huge amount of inflation in that time period. $50k in '96 is like $75k today, so even if this new RX is $50k it's still $25k cheaper than an equivalent FD RX-7.

Granted, the 350/370Z was/is very cheap. 370's start at $30k, but that uses an engine shared with a ton of different cars. This thing is going to have a bespoke (at least for now) engine, and as Sporty said, a Miata hits $33-35k easily. No way they're not pricing this at least $10k more, more like $15k realistically.
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

MX793

Quote from: 12,000 RPM on October 27, 2015, 11:48:14 AM
O boy. Things are coming into focus now. I was going to say, OK, just collect the oil, but I'm guessing it goes right out the tailpipe.... hence the high oil consumption and emissions. Maybe they have gone to roller bearings for apex seals? IDK man.

Apex seals are the piston rings in a rotary engine.  Not sure how you use roller bearings there.

And yes, the lubrication oil for the seals is consumed and blown out the tailpipe.  Continuing to inject oil into a deactivated rotor risks buildup and potential sparkplug fouling if left running that way too long.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

12,000 RPM

Quote from: MX793 on October 27, 2015, 12:52:14 PM
Apex seals are the piston rings in a rotary engine.  Not sure how you use roller bearings there.

And yes, the lubrication oil for the seals is consumed and blown out the tailpipe.  Continuing to inject oil into a deactivated rotor risks buildup and potential sparkplug fouling if left running that way too long.
I mean they do DoD in piston engines and those need oil all the time too.

Another idea, which is the nuclear option, would be to couple and decouple rotors with clutches and dogteeth. Have 2 or 3 rotors and take them completely on/offline as needed. No pumping losses or lubrication issues and the dogteeth could be arranged so it would only mesh 1 way. Pretty crazy idea but then so is the rotary engine.
Protecctor of the Atmospheric Engine #TheyLiedToUs

Cookie Monster

Quote from: 12,000 RPM on October 27, 2015, 01:07:35 PM
I mean they do DoD in piston engines and those need oil all the time too.

Another idea, which is the nuclear option, would be to couple and decouple rotors with clutches and dogteeth. Have 2 or 3 rotors and take them completely on/offline as needed. No pumping losses or lubrication issues and the dogteeth could be arranged so it would only mesh 1 way. Pretty crazy idea but then so is the rotary engine.

Piston engines don't receive their oil lubrication through the fuel...
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

MX793

Piston engines get oil from the bottom end which is dragged up into the cylinder by the piston (2-strokes excluded).
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

12,000 RPM

So rotaries are basically 2 strokes? Yea this is not happening
Protecctor of the Atmospheric Engine #TheyLiedToUs

MX793

Quote from: 12,000 RPM on October 27, 2015, 04:17:01 PM
So rotaries are basically 2 strokes? Yea this is not happening

While technically a "4 stroke" cycle, they have a number of commonalities with 2-strokes.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

Cookie Monster

Quote from: 12,000 RPM on October 27, 2015, 04:17:01 PM
So rotaries are basically 2 strokes? Yea this is not happening

Lol so you were suggesting that they do all this crazy stuff like displacement on demand and dog-teeth engaged rotors without knowing how a rotary works? :lol: :wtf:
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

MrH

Lol, I swear sporty. Sometimes I really question if you've got an engineering degree and actually like cars :lol:
2023 Ford Lightning Lariat ER
2019 Acura RDX SH-AWD
2023 BRZ Limited

Previous: '02 Mazda Protege5, '08 Mazda Miata, '05 Toyota Tacoma, '09 Honda Element, '13 Subaru BRZ, '14 Hyundai Genesis R-Spec 5.0, '15 Toyota 4Runner SR5, '18 Honda Accord EX-L 2.0t, '01 Honda S2000, '20 Subaru Outback XT, '23 Chevy Bolt EUV

Cookie Monster

RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

MX793

Quote from: thecarnut on October 27, 2015, 04:30:37 PM
Lol so you were suggesting that they do all this crazy stuff like displacement on demand and dog-teeth engaged rotors without knowing how a rotary works? :lol: :wtf:
Quote from: MrH on October 27, 2015, 05:17:46 PM
Lol, I swear sporty. Sometimes I really question if you've got an engineering degree and actually like cars :lol:

Wow, harsh crowd...
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

Cookie Monster

RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

MX793

Greenhouse seems too small for the car.  Has Camaro-esque gunslit windows.  Otherwise, it kind of reminds me of an AMG GT-S.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

Cookie Monster

Quote from: MX793 on October 27, 2015, 05:53:11 PM
Greenhouse seems too small for the car.  Has Camaro-esque gunslit windows.  Otherwise, it kind of reminds me of an AMG GT-S.

Yeah, the wheels are giant and the windows are too small, but I'm hoping those will be fixed for production. I'm not a huge fan of the headlights but I think those will be toned down a bit for production as well. I love the rest of the car though. I'm just hoping Mazda doesn't drop the ball on the weight or doesn't just offer it with a DCT or some shit.
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

MX793

Quote from: thecarnut on October 27, 2015, 05:58:34 PM
Yeah, the wheels are giant and the windows are too small, but I'm hoping those will be fixed for production. I'm not a huge fan of the headlights but I think those will be toned down a bit for production as well. I love the rest of the car though. I'm just hoping Mazda doesn't drop the ball on the weight or doesn't just offer it with a DCT or some shit.

They'll do one better and only offer it in Japan and Europe in very limited quantities.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

FlatBlackCaddy

Am i missing some updated info that you guys are looking at?

MX793

Quote from: FlatBlackCaddy on October 27, 2015, 06:59:02 PM
Am i missing some updated info that you guys are looking at?

Google "RX-Vision" or go to any of the major auto mag websites.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

FlatBlackCaddy

Ya, just checked it out. Looks good to me, toned down a bit for production and I think it will look good. Might have to start setting aside a few bucks for a down payment fund.

FlatBlackCaddy

Thats a lot of room between the front wheels and cowl, lots of room

You could probably fit a 4 rotor in there.......dare to dream.

12,000 RPM

Quote from: MX793 on October 27, 2015, 05:44:48 PM
Wow, harsh crowd...
They are telling on themselves more than anything. Light work.

Unless Mazda has figured out how to keep the rotors lubricated without consuming the oil there is just no way this thing will work.
Protecctor of the Atmospheric Engine #TheyLiedToUs

Eye of the Tiger

2008 TUNDRA (Truck Ultra-wideband Never-say-die Daddy Rottweiler Awesome)

Raza

Wow, you guys are really getting your hopes up for this.  I'd be more cautious......



Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

Cookie Monster

Quote from: 12,000 RPM on October 27, 2015, 07:46:58 PM
They are telling on themselves more than anything. Light work.

Unless Mazda has figured out how to keep the rotors lubricated without consuming the oil there is just no way this thing will work.

Why, because we call you out on your improbable and laughable ideas?

Gee, I wonder why I never venture into the politics threads...
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

MX793

Quote from: 12,000 RPM on October 27, 2015, 07:46:58 PM
They are telling on themselves more than anything. Light work.

Unless Mazda has figured out how to keep the rotors lubricated without consuming the oil there is just no way this thing will work.

Why does it have to have DoD?  Did Mazda say it would?
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

12,000 RPM

Quote from: MX793 on October 27, 2015, 08:56:35 PM
Why does it have to have DoD?  Did Mazda say it would?
It doesn't have to have DoD. However I can't imagine oil consumption on the level of a 2 stroke passing any modern emissions standards.

Quote from: thecarnut on October 27, 2015, 08:47:05 PM
Why, because we call you out on your improbable and laughable ideas?

Gee, I wonder why I never venture into the politics threads...
You guys are just dogpiling and playing stupid. What have I suggested that is so improbable? And you don't venture into politics because you are too scared.
Protecctor of the Atmospheric Engine #TheyLiedToUs

Eye of the Tiger

Just add more rotors and more oil. Apex seals aren't much of a problem, anymore. Need to add more emissions control crap.
2008 TUNDRA (Truck Ultra-wideband Never-say-die Daddy Rottweiler Awesome)

Payman

I was hoping for something closer to production. Still, it's exciting that the rotary sportscar from Mazda is alive and well.  :dance: