http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?se...article_id=2220 (http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=2&article_id=2220)
all those cars are winner in my book.
The Zonda seems a little slow, given the low weight and massive (I'm assuming seeing as it's a 7.3 AMG engine) low end torque.
Supposedly, The 7.3 is going to be worked on to produce at least 630 horses and 600 ft. lb. of twist.
Eitther way, i'd be happy with any one of those cars, but Zonda first please :praise: :rockon:
QuoteThe Zonda seems a little slow, given the low weight and massive (I'm assuming seeing as it's a 7.3 AMG engine) low end torque.
Supposedly, The 7.3 is going to be worked on to produce at least 630 horses and 600 ft. lb. of twist.
Eitther way, i'd be happy with any one of those cars, but Zonda first please :praise: :rockon:
i still have to warm up to the styling of the Zonda a bit.
I would probably take the Pagani out of that group. But nobody is offering :angry:
I'd take the Zonda as well...just because it's a lot rarer and it's one beautiful (but ugly at the same time) car.
QuoteI'd take the Zonda as well...just because it's a lot rarer and it's one beautiful (but ugly at the same time) car.
If you want beautiful go with the Volante ;)
Hmmmmmmmmmurci?lago :lol:
Why does the Murcielago weigh 4300 pounds!? :o
QuoteWhy does the Murcielago weigh 4300 pounds!? :o
AWD
QuoteQuoteWhy does the Murcielago weigh 4300 pounds!? :o
AWD
And a lot of other shit
QuoteQuoteWhy does the Murcielago weigh 4300 pounds!? :o
AWD
The Diablo VT was AWD, and it weighs 500 pounds less. <_<
Looks like they did too good a job stowing the top away on the DB9. I liked the "unfinished" look on the DB7.
But, you guessed it, I'm going with the Zonda.