CarSPIN Forums

Auto Talk => The Big Guys => Topic started by: 2o6 on April 18, 2018, 11:13:02 AM

Title: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 2o6 on April 18, 2018, 11:13:02 AM
I was bored, so I decided to stop and drive this thing. This one is a base "S" model, with the 1.0, and FWD.

(https://s31.postimg.cc/c9e5o3mvf/worie.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

(https://s31.postimg.cc/mw7ytj2qj/worie2.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

(https://s31.postimg.cc/wgrlgezsb/worie3.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)




+ the 1.0L and 3cyl work well together, even if they don't really move the car around that fast

+ the interior is roomier than the Fiesta

+ I like the base trim wheels

+ pretty decent standard features (here's looking at you Chevy Trax)

+ compact dimensions = easy to park

- this car is what Ford basically wants people to buy instead of the Fiesta. It's worse in every way.

- the 1.0L makes 40+ mpg in the Fiesta and Focus, yet here it's only rated for 29 Highway.

- considering how slow the car is, 29MPG is ass

- the car itself feels tippy, cornering too hard may actually make it turn over. In fact, it's got a rollover warning on the visor. (The Toyota C-HR Didn't!)

- it looks pretty tragic outside

- steering is worse than the Fiesta

- ford engines never reach their economy, and the 11MPG economy differential between the focus 1.0 and the Ecosport 1.0, I predict the Ecosport is gonna be shit

- it's pronounced "echo sport" gross.

- the interior room itself is mediocre at best

- susceptible to crosswinds

- This car is around $4000 more than an similar Fiesta. (About 1k more than a Focus)

- But in typical ford fashion, it won't transact for retail price

- the ride was stiff and jittery



Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: Laconian on April 18, 2018, 11:24:29 AM
Oh dear. One liter is just not enough engine for a car like this.

It's only for tiny cars and skirting displacement taxes.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: AutobahnSHO on April 18, 2018, 01:01:50 PM
I really super wonder how expensive the Turbos are going to cost to replace on these things. About 10yrs they're going to need some work.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: shp4man on April 18, 2018, 01:13:30 PM
Have we ever had a vehicle made in India marketed here before?
I can think of one motorcycle, that's about it.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 2o6 on April 18, 2018, 02:44:59 PM
Quote from: Laconian on April 18, 2018, 11:24:29 AM
Oh dear. One liter is just not enough engine for a car like this.

It's only for tiny cars and skirting displacement taxes.



???


It's as fast as the 1.4T in the Trax.


It's *fine*. It just should do better.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 2o6 on April 18, 2018, 02:51:01 PM
Also, didn't your MIL have a Renault Captur with the 900cc TCE? This car is exactly the same size. And it has like 30HP more and like 50 ft lbs of torque more.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: giant_mtb on April 18, 2018, 03:40:07 PM
Echo sport?  Have I been pronouncing "ecoboost" wrong all along? :confused:
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 93JC on April 18, 2018, 04:20:07 PM
Quote from: 2o6 on April 18, 2018, 11:13:02 AM
- it's pronounced "echo sport" gross.

:confused:

Fuuuuuuuuck that. Probably coming from the same goofs who said "SHO" is pronounced "show"; no, no, it's ess-aitch-oh, and anything else is categorically wrong.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 12,000 RPM on April 18, 2018, 05:23:06 PM
This is real third world shit. Somehow I feel they could have made a better crossover out of the Fiesta, this is just unacceptable.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: veeman on April 18, 2018, 05:59:45 PM
This car seems to not have anything really that appealing other than really small dimensions.  It looks OK.  I'd take a Kia Soul, Mazda CX3, or Subaru Crosstrek over it. 

Using fueleconomy.gov and 15,000 miles a year/45% highway and 55% city driving: the annual fuel cost difference between the EcoSport and Fiesta is $150.

Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: r0tor on April 18, 2018, 06:04:04 PM
Killing the fiesta and replacing it with something worse but with a better profit margin... Beancounters are back in charge of Ford
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 2o6 on April 18, 2018, 06:36:13 PM
Quote from: veeman on April 18, 2018, 05:59:45 PM
This car seems to not have anything really that appealing other than really small dimensions.  It looks OK.  I'd take a Kia Soul, Mazda CX3, or Subaru Crosstrek over it. 

Using fueleconomy.gov and 15,000 miles a year/45% highway and 55% city driving: the annual fuel cost difference between the EcoSport and Fiesta is $150.


SFE to Ecoboost FWD, it's more like $450. Also, real world I drive more freeway miles, and real world the Ecosport will be worse real world.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: Payman on April 18, 2018, 06:49:39 PM
Yuck.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: ifcar on April 18, 2018, 07:05:21 PM
Quote from: 2o6 on April 18, 2018, 11:13:02 AM


+ the interior is roomier than the Fiesta

- this car is what Ford basically wants people to buy instead of the Fiesta. It's worse in every way.

Roomier is good!
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 2o6 on April 18, 2018, 07:10:53 PM
I will say that the pricing is aggressive, and Ford has strong incentives.

A FWD SES with SYNC, moonroof, push-to-start, heated seats and other goodies were only $2500 more than the basic S model. I could have gotten that one with low APR, and all the goodies for like $23k, before any sort of negotiating.


However, if you INSIST on getting a tall FWD SUV type thing, a Kia Soul 1.6 is a better value. And a better car.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: MrH on April 18, 2018, 07:27:11 PM
What a miserable looking car.

That reminds me.  I saw a Spark Active the other day.  Turrrrible looking car
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 2o6 on April 18, 2018, 07:33:02 PM
Quote from: MrH on April 18, 2018, 07:27:11 PM
What a miserable looking car.

That reminds me.  I saw a Spark Active the other day.  Turrrrible looking car


I like the Spark Active!
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 93JC on April 18, 2018, 08:10:07 PM
*googles "Spark Active"*

Oh, okay. No wonder I've never heard of this: "No Chevrolet Spark Activ for Canada" (http://www.autotrader.ca/newsfeatures/20161114/no-chevrolet-spark-activ-for-canada/)
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 12,000 RPM on April 18, 2018, 08:17:49 PM
Quote from: r0tor on April 18, 2018, 06:04:04 PM
Killing the fiesta and replacing it with something worse but with a better profit margin... Beancounters are back in charge of Ford
What's the alternative? Fiesta retail sales are in freefall; a redesign on a low margin low volume subcompact is pointless. This is bad but sadly people will buy it.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 2o6 on April 18, 2018, 08:49:38 PM
Quote from: 12,000 RPM on April 18, 2018, 08:17:49 PM
What's the alternative? Fiesta retail sales are in freefall; a redesign on a low margin low volume subcompact is pointless. This is bad but sadly people will buy it.


1. The Fiesta has already been redesigned, and is on sale for like a year now.

2. Will it sell? The Fiesta is still selling about 50K units a year. Will this do that? Who knows.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: Rich on April 18, 2018, 10:46:46 PM
The more time goes on the closer we get to Idiocracy. This looks like one of the car/pods
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: Laconian on April 18, 2018, 11:14:06 PM
Lol

(https://triviahappy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/IMG_1515.jpg)
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: veeman on April 18, 2018, 11:31:48 PM
Quote from: 2o6 on April 18, 2018, 06:36:13 PM

SFE to Ecoboost FWD, it's more like $450. Also, real world I drive more freeway miles, and real world the Ecosport will be worse real world.

What is "S"FE?  Anyways I put in on fueleconomy.gov a FWD EcoSport compared with Fiesta using 15,000 miles/year and 85% highway driving and got a difference of $250 per year.  It's a significant difference but not a huge difference. 

Anyways your observations about the car seem spot on. 

Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 2o6 on April 18, 2018, 11:48:35 PM
Quote from: veeman on April 18, 2018, 11:31:48 PM
What is "S"FE?  Anyways I put in on fueleconomy.gov a FWD EcoSport compared with Fiesta using 15,000 miles/year and 85% highway driving and got a difference of $250 per year.  It's a significant difference but not a huge difference. 

Anyways your observations about the car seem spot on.


The SFE has the 1.0

The regular is a 1.6
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: MrH on April 19, 2018, 07:13:15 AM
Quote from: Rich on April 18, 2018, 10:46:46 PM
The more time goes on the closer we get to idiicracy. This looks like one of the car/pods

:lol: Spot on
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: Rich on April 19, 2018, 09:08:23 AM
speaking of

(https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--9IHtkdY6--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/z3dv5ryxq0qjvwkdr276.jpg)
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: CaminoRacer on April 19, 2018, 09:49:19 AM
Those headlights are almost bigger than the wheels.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 2o6 on April 19, 2018, 10:11:30 AM
Quote from: Rich on April 19, 2018, 09:08:23 AM
speaking of

(https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--9IHtkdY6--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/z3dv5ryxq0qjvwkdr276.jpg)


What's wrong with it?
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: Xer0 on April 19, 2018, 10:39:06 AM
Isnt the Ecosport something like 5 model years old at this point too?  Hopefully Ford has figured out all of this car's issues in time for the new one.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 2o6 on April 19, 2018, 10:46:35 AM
Quote from: Xer0 on April 19, 2018, 10:39:06 AM
Isnt the Ecosport something like 5 model years old at this point too?  Hopefully Ford has figured out all of this car's issues in time for the new one.


This is like it's 3rd facelift.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: cawimmer430 on April 19, 2018, 10:51:39 AM
I think we get a version of this thing here (I remember seeing something similar on the road), but I am too lazy to check.  :tounge:
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: Xer0 on April 19, 2018, 11:26:52 AM
Quote from: 2o6 on April 19, 2018, 10:46:35 AM

This is like it's 3rd facelift.

Jeez, I hope Ford's got another one cooking cause this segment is growing and loaded with viable options and this looks pretty bad.
Title: Re: 2o6 Review: Ford Ecosport
Post by: 12,000 RPM on April 19, 2018, 05:56:02 PM
Quote from: cawimmer430 on April 19, 2018, 10:51:39 AM
I think we get a version of this thing here (I remember seeing something similar on the road), but I am too lazy to check.  :tounge:
1er replacement? Here's your Detroit iron!