Poll
Question:
Which would you rather have?
Option 1:
votes: 2
Option 2:
votes: 17
So, which one?
I'll walk.
WHat kind of comparison is this? You might as well throw a Mercury Topaz into the mix as well.
I vote Camry, the lesser of two evils.
wrong camry interior?
BIKING FTW!!!! :rockon: :rockon: :rockon:
(I can't believe I'd vote Camry for anything.)
Guys, I just meant that gen...'99-'04, '97-'02.
The Malibu seats are more comfortable. That's all I'm gonna say.
Both are boring, but at least the Camry isn't atrocious.
Quote from: CMan on May 14, 2007, 10:14:37 PM
Guys, I just meant that gen...'99-'04, '97-'02.
The Camry generation is 97-01, and you used the 02-06 interior.
Oh. Stupid me. :hammerhead:
Quote from: ifcar on May 15, 2007, 05:10:49 AM
The Camry generation is 97-01, and you used the 02-06 interior.
Also the Malibu was 97-04', not 99'.
Dang me
Dang me
They oughta take a rope and hang me
High from the highest tree
Woman would you weep for me
Camry i suppose.
Quote from: ifcar on May 15, 2007, 05:10:49 AM
The Camry generation is 97-01, and you used the 02-06 interior.
With all due respect, Iffy, he used the correct generation of Camry interior. I would know, we have a 2000 in the garage that will be mine.
Quote from: CJ on May 15, 2007, 05:30:33 PM
With all due respect, Iffy, he used the correct generation of Camry interior. I would know, we have a 2000 in the garage that will be mine.
i do believe the interior pic was changed.
Yessir.
Oh...oops!
Malibu and I am the only one so far. I'll take a chevy over a toyota any day and I like the malibu better, design wise IMO. I don't like either car though.
(http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/1743/dsc00358ty4.jpg)
(http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/4949/dsc00359ng6.jpg)
(http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/6971/dsc00360lw4.jpg)
See odometer reading.
:wub: :wub: :wub:
:praise: :praise: :praise:
'Nuff said.
Your sauce is weak.
(http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid83/p120389261553d35f7158eb5f8329ffa4/fadb0a5c.jpg)
The odo on my '89 AllTrac nearly doubled that when I last saw it.
The last odo pic I have of it is at 307K or so.
A certain Honda Prelude has 322,000 MILES on it (not those weak ass kilometers :P ). Of course it is on its second engine, but the first made it to about 250k.
That's easy. Had to go with the Camry, one of my dream cars! :rockon:
For Mark and Trep, both of you suck, my dad's camry (used to be mine) is at 270k miles
Quote from: Danish on May 26, 2007, 05:29:07 PM
For Mark and Trep, both of you suck, my dad's camry (used to be mine) is at 270k miles
... the AllTrac was around 600,000km or something, I may be off, when it was sold by my family friend to a college kid a few weeks ago.
Our Astro died with 245,000 miles on the original engine. My car had 159k when the original engine died. If I had to pick between the Malibu's possibly evil manifold gasket on the 3.4 liter engine (which is mechanically identical to the engine in the Venture) or the Toyota appliance-like 3.0 liter engine, I'd have to pick between the latter. I know that the 3400 can be reliable and it's torquey as hell, but the rest of the Malibu blows and is cheaply constructed in comparison to the refri--er, Camry.
Gimme a Contour instead...or a Legacy...or something!
The Malibu used the 3100 engine, not the 3400. Platform-mates Grand Am and Alero used the 3400.
Quote from: 93JC on May 26, 2007, 09:29:45 PM
The Malibu used the 3100 engine, not the 3400. Platform-mates Grand Am and Alero used the 3400.
My bad. The manifold problem for the 3400 was fixed for the 2001 model year (good to know now), but I don't know a whole lot about the 3100. Our Olds had the 3300, which was a POS.