It was the most powerful Golf ever. The Golf R32 powered by a 177 kW (241 bhp) engine was first launched in August 2002. Not only was it one of the hottest cars on the road, it also sold like hot cakes: three times as many R32's were sold than originally planned. These are excellent prospects for its successor.
Now comes a new R32 based on the Golf V generation. This time it packs 184 kW (250 bhp) under the bonnet; the permanent 4MOTION four-wheel drive again promises excellent roadholding. The new model will see its world premiere at the 59th Frankfurt Motor Show (15 to 25 September). Market launch will be at the end of September. Prices for the new Golf R32 start at ?32,200.
From the outside, the best Golf ever is not only recognisable by the R32 logo. Similar to its predecessor, the new top Golf has a design and equipment all of its own. The Golf R32 has a top speed of 250 km/h and comes either with a 6-speed manual gearbox or the optional dual clutch gearbox (DSG). Equipped with the DSG the 'R32' is even faster: 6.2 instead 6.5 seconds from 0-100 km/h. Despite all this, the model is unusually easy to handle.
From the front, the new R32 generation is immediately recognisable by its unique aluminium-effect shield-shaped radiator grille. At the top of the grille are double aluminium cross struts. Under the number plate there is another central air scoop for the powerful 3.2-litre V6 engine. Two more large openings on each side of the shield-shaped radiator grille are intended for fresh air supply. As opposed to all other Golfs, there are air ducts at the bottom and on either side of the fully painted front bumper. The lines of the air duct continue into the side skirt all the way along to the rear bumper.
The rear of the Golf R32 is also designed as a fully painted bumper. Only the middle section in the shape of a diffuser is in black. The two round tailpipes made of polished stainless steel are placed centrally next to each other and are integrated prominently in the rear bumper. A glance at the outline of the Golf R32 shows the 18-inch light-alloy wheels (type 'Zolder?). They are fitted with 20 spokes and continue the design theme of the first R32 wheel. The spokes still allow glimpses of what lies behind them: brake calipers painted blue. They come with 345 mm (diameter) discs at the front and 310 mm at the rear.
The 225/40 tyres bear the Y-pattern tread for high-speed tyres up to 300 km/h. A large-size rear spoiler makes sure that the rear wheels stay firmly on the road. The fact that the wheel-tyre combination sits snugly in the wheel housings is partly due to the 18-inch wheel size but also to the specially tuned sports running gear that is lower by 20 millimetres.
The sporty concept of the Golf R32 is a theme that permeates the entire vehicle. Take the interior, for example. There are distinctive instruments, sports seats, pedals in aluminium look and special applications that emphasise the sporty nature of the Golf. The sports steering wheel, with perforated leather along the grip area, and the R32 gear shift knob lie firmly in the hand.
As opposed to the more purist style of the Golf GTI, the R32 top model boasts a dazzling array of standard equipment at no extra price, such as automatic air conditioning (Climatronic), the RCD 300 audio system with ten loudspeakers, anti-theft alarm system plus, multifunction display, automatic anti-dazzle interior mirror, rain sensor, tyre pressure monitor and the complete safety programme comprising six airbags, ESP and brake assistant. The standard bi-xenon headlights light up the night like day.
No other car in this segment offers so many different engines. With the introduction of the Golf R32 the model range now stretches from 55 kW (75 bhp) to 184 kW (250 bhp). Including the R32-V6, there are ten engines on offer ? six petrol and four diesel. This year two more interesting engines will be added to the Golf range. The Golf remains an exciting car to watch.
(http://www.germancarfans.com/news/2050809.005/2050809.005.Mini1L.jpg)
(http://www.germancarfans.com/news/2050809.005/2050809.005.Mini2L.jpg)
(http://www.germancarfans.com/news/2050809.005/2050809.005.Mini4L.jpg)
(http://www.germancarfans.com/news/2050809.005/2050809.005.Mini5L.jpg)
(http://www.germancarfans.com/news/2050809.005/2050809.005.Mini6L.jpg)
(http://www.germancarfans.com/news/2050809.005/2050809.005.Mini8L.jpg)
(http://www.germancarfans.com/news/2050809.005/2050809.005.Mini9L.jpg)
(http://www.germancarfans.com/news/2050809.005/2050809.005.Mini10L.jpg)
(http://www.germancarfans.com/news/2050809.005/2050809.005.Mini11L.jpg)
(http://www.germancarfans.com/news/2050809.005/2050809.005.Mini12L.jpg)
I'm lovin' the 4-door, but the 2-door hatch looks too...well...cute. :lol:
I like it, but I wish they had figured out a way to get the new 3.6l in there.
The 4 door looks sweet. At 250 hp you can bet it will roll too.
The seats look great B)
But somehow, it has lost the hardedginess, if you will, of the previous R32. It doesnt look as mean.
The current one looks much better. The upturn at the backend of the 3 door gives it too much of a bubbly, cutesy look. Kind of makes it look like a Focus.
(http://www.germancarfans.com/news/2050809.005/2050809.005.Mini6L.jpg)
Cayenne!
(http://img234.imageshack.us/img234/4676/golfr323td.jpg)
Last-gen R32 spotted in York, England. :praise:
Nice photo.
Thanks...my bro took it. ^_^
Looks, and sounds, good. I actually think the 5-door is better looking as well. I was thinking about that as I scrolled through the pictures and then you guys saying it really says I am not imagining things.
I think the A3 will get the same engine/awd combo, yeah?
QuoteLooks, and sounds, good. I actually think the 5-door is better looking as well. I was thinking about that as I scrolled through the pictures and then you guys saying it really says I am not imagining things.
I think the A3 will get the same engine/awd combo, yeah?
If so, I hope soon. Then I'd know what car to buy. If I lived in England now, I'd buy an Audi A3 3.2 Quattro Sportback (3 door) 6 speed for roughly 25K pounds. They need to sell that here, with the manual and AWD intact.
QuoteLooks, and sounds, good. I actually think the 5-door is better looking as well. I was thinking about that as I scrolled through the pictures and then you guys saying it really says I am not imagining things.
I think the A3 will get the same engine/awd combo, yeah?
If so, I hope soon. Then I'd know what car to buy. If I lived in England now, I'd buy an Audi A3 3.2 Quattro Sportback (3 door) 6 speed for roughly 25K pounds. They need to sell that here, with the manual and AWD intact.
Meh...almost doesn't seem worth it. Not that i think this is a bad car, but I would be more likely to get the 2.0T GTI once it hits our shores than this. The small turbo engine suits the personality better I think.
Just my own opinion though.
I agree with raza, this new R32 doesn't look as hot as the current gen.
Personally for the kinda of cash they want i'd pick up a Mazdaspeed 3 or 6, both are probobly cheaper.
Is there a Mazdaspeed3?
I don't like the Mazdaspeed 6. It just looked weird when i saw it at the auto show. Actually this may seem weird but they had some souped up Galant and i thought that looked really good, so maybe my taste isn't normal. :P
QuoteIs there a Mazdaspeed3?
I don't like the Mazdaspeed 6. It just looked weird when i saw it at the auto show. Actually this may seem weird but they had some souped up Galant and i thought that looked really good, so maybe my taste isn't normal. :P
Its being tested at the moment.
A) I'm stealing those seats
B) WHY did they fuck up the styling? :(
Anyone know the torque split of the 4wd?
4 motion is the FWD based system(i believe, i'm not too up on VW tech). Anyway i believe its max split is 50/50, with more power going to the front when not at 50/50.
I wonder if someone were to hack into the 4motion code, would they be able to lock it inot 50/50?
Quote4 motion is the FWD based system(i believe, i'm not too up on VW tech). Anyway i believe its max split is 50/50, with more power going to the front when not at 50/50.
It uses a Torsen diff, right? Is the Phaetons' the same kind of 4 motion?
QuoteQuote4 motion is the FWD based system(i believe, i'm not too up on VW tech). Anyway i believe its max split is 50/50, with more power going to the front when not at 50/50.
It uses a Torsen diff, right? Is the Phaetons' the same kind of 4 motion?
My car uses a torsen differential, the Golf (and its variants) all use a haldex type differential.
Its been a while since I read about the technical differences, but in theory you can get a haldex system to be RWD biased. Look at the X-Type and the nee Alfa 159. I think the main difference is that a torsen differential is mainly a mechanical setup vs the haldex being a largely computer controlled setup.
QuoteQuoteQuote4 motion is the FWD based system(i believe, i'm not too up on VW tech). Anyway i believe its max split is 50/50, with more power going to the front when not at 50/50.
It uses a Torsen diff, right? Is the Phaetons' the same kind of 4 motion?
My car uses a torsen differential, the Golf (and its variants) all use a haldex type differential.
Its been a while since I read about the technical differences, but in theory you can get a haldex system to be RWD biased. Look at the X-Type and the nee Alfa 159. I think the main difference is that a torsen differential is mainly a mechanical setup vs the haldex being a largely computer controlled setup.
ah. so the new R32 is still FWD biased? :(
QuoteMeh...almost doesn't seem worth it. Not that i think this is a bad car, but I would be more likely to get the 2.0T GTI once it hits our shores than this. The small turbo engine suits the personality better I think.
Just my own opinion though.
I'm pretty much done with VWAG unless they stick a stick in the A4 3.2. They no longer sell vehicles that suit my needs.
QuoteAnyone know the torque split of the 4wd?
It's the same system used in the TT, a Haldex system with a front wheel bias.
FWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
QuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
On a car that small it's not a big deal. You can get the back end of a TT out. I've done it myself.
QuoteQuoteMeh...almost doesn't seem worth it. Not that i think this is a bad car, but I would be more likely to get the 2.0T GTI once it hits our shores than this. The small turbo engine suits the personality better I think.
Just my own opinion though.
I'm pretty much done with VWAG unless they stick a stick in the A4 3.2. They no longer sell vehicles that suit my needs.
What's wrong with the A4 2.0T?
Or the S4 6MT?
:P
The no 6MT on the 3.2 is silly IMHO. I don't understand why they don't offer one in the US.
QuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
QuoteQuoteQuoteMeh...almost doesn't seem worth it. Not that i think this is a bad car, but I would be more likely to get the 2.0T GTI once it hits our shores than this. The small turbo engine suits the personality better I think.
Just my own opinion though.
I'm pretty much done with VWAG unless they stick a stick in the A4 3.2. They no longer sell vehicles that suit my needs.
What's wrong with the A4 2.0T?
Or the S4 6MT?
:P
The no 6MT on the 3.2 is silly IMHO. I don't understand why they don't offer one in the US.
The 2.0T is too slow. If I can't have a fast car on the side, then I need my daily driver to be fast as well. I think this 130i might be the one for me. 330i power with the price of a 325 or less. It's a hatch, sexy as shit, and probably all the mods that can be done to the 330 can be done to the 130. Much like the C320 Sports Coupe was the smart CLK320, the 130i is the smart 330i.
QuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
The EVO should've been RWD.
QuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
On a car that small it's not a big deal. You can get the back end of a TT out. I've done it myself.
on a small car, 4wd isn't really needed. you only need 4wd when the power is so great, that two wheels can't handle all the power.
QuoteQuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
The EVO should've been RWD.
No no no no nononononononono.
If you think the Evo should be RWD you're missing the point of the Evo.
QuoteQuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
On a car that small it's not a big deal. You can get the back end of a TT out. I've done it myself.
on a small car, 4wd isn't really needed. you only need 4wd when the power is so great, that two wheels can't handle all the power.
My car can easily overwhelm the front tires, and it's got 170bhp. The 225bhp TT should do more than that.
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
The EVO should've been RWD.
No no no no nononononononono.
If you think the Evo should be RWD you're missing the point of the Evo.
You can ignore him when he says things like that.
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
The EVO should've been RWD.
No no no no nononononononono.
If you think the Evo should be RWD you're missing the point of the Evo.
If the first Evo had been RWD, then you wouldn't be saying that. Seriously though, if there was a compact RWD, high performance, cheap, lightweight sedan, it'd be my first car.
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
The EVO should've been RWD.
No no no no nononononononono.
If you think the Evo should be RWD you're missing the point of the Evo.
If the first Evo had been RWD, then you wouldn't be saying that. Seriously though, if there was a compact RWD, high performance, cheap, lightweight sedan, it'd be my first car.
If the Evo would be RWD it wouldn't be an Evo. Just as if the Jeep Wrangler was a sedan, it wouldn't be a Jeep Wrangler.
It's a rally bred sedan--that's why it is what it is, and that's what makes it so great. It's a 4 door bad weather everyday cheap supercar. Make it rear drive and it's unique for being rear drive, but people wouldn't pay 30 grand for it.
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
The EVO should've been RWD.
No no no no nononononononono.
If you think the Evo should be RWD you're missing the point of the Evo.
You can ignore him when he says things like that.
I probably should, but I have this didactic gene in me somewhere. It's the same part of me that keeps telling me to be a teacher instead of a financial analyst.
QuoteI wonder if someone were to hack into the 4motion code, would they be able to lock it inot 50/50?
Yes, it is possible. I believe HPA does that. They make some sick cars, 500+hp R32s and TTs, 0-60 in under 3.5 seconds :o :rockon:
QuoteQuoteI wonder if someone were to hack into the 4motion code, would they be able to lock it inot 50/50?
Yes, it is possible. I believe HPA does that. They make some sick cars, 500+hp R32s and TTs, 0-60 in under 3.5 seconds :o :rockon:
That HPA R32, with 550bhp is supposed to kick an Enzo's ass to 60 (by .1 of a second :)). It's only 32 grand in GT4. How much in real life?
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
The EVO should've been RWD.
No no no no nononononononono.
If you think the Evo should be RWD you're missing the point of the Evo.
You can ignore him when he says things like that.
I probably should, but I have this didactic gene in me somewhere. It's the same part of me that keeps telling me to be a teacher instead of a financial analyst.
It's easy to find a job as a teacher, if that matters. But you'd probably be fired for swearing at idiot parents.
There is a HPA R32 in GT4?!?! Anyway, the one C/D tested in their supercar test cost $81000 and it wasn't even the top model ("just" 450 hp).
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
The EVO should've been RWD.
No no no no nononononononono.
If you think the Evo should be RWD you're missing the point of the Evo.
You can ignore him when he says things like that.
I probably should, but I have this didactic gene in me somewhere. It's the same part of me that keeps telling me to be a teacher instead of a financial analyst.
It's easy to find a job as a teacher, if that matters. But you'd probably be fired for swearing at idiot parents.
I think he's more concerned about money than job availability ;)
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
The EVO should've been RWD.
No no no no nononononononono.
If you think the Evo should be RWD you're missing the point of the Evo.
You can ignore him when he says things like that.
I probably should, but I have this didactic gene in me somewhere. It's the same part of me that keeps telling me to be a teacher instead of a financial analyst.
It's easy to find a job as a teacher, if that matters. But you'd probably be fired for swearing at idiot parents.
I hope to be at the college level as a junior professor, or at the very least in high school.
But yeah, I probably would.
Do I really swear that often?
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
The EVO should've been RWD.
No no no no nononononononono.
If you think the Evo should be RWD you're missing the point of the Evo.
You can ignore him when he says things like that.
I probably should, but I have this didactic gene in me somewhere. It's the same part of me that keeps telling me to be a teacher instead of a financial analyst.
It's easy to find a job as a teacher, if that matters. But you'd probably be fired for swearing at idiot parents.
I think he's more concerned about money than job availability ;)
You catch on quick. Yes, money is definitely an issue. I've got big dreams, and they don't get paid for on a teacher's salary.
QuoteThere is a HPA R32 in GT4?!?! Anyway, the one C/D tested in their supercar test cost $81000 and it wasn't even the top model ("just" 450 hp).
yeah. hella cheap too. 31k. :o
QuoteThere is a HPA R32 in GT4?!?! Anyway, the one C/D tested in their supercar test cost $81000 and it wasn't even the top model ("just" 450 hp).
Yeah, in the Tuners section. I did a GT3-->GT4 conversion, so I had $100,000 grand, and instead of buying an E55 or something, I got that, a 350Z, and an SRT-4.
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
The EVO should've been RWD.
No no no no nononononononono.
If you think the Evo should be RWD you're missing the point of the Evo.
You can ignore him when he says things like that.
I probably should, but I have this didactic gene in me somewhere. It's the same part of me that keeps telling me to be a teacher instead of a financial analyst.
It's easy to find a job as a teacher, if that matters. But you'd probably be fired for swearing at idiot parents.
I hope to be at the college level as a junior professor, or at the very least in high school.
But yeah, I probably would.
Do I really swear that often?
Rarily does a post go buy that you don't use a profane word ;).
And, I wish I had known about the HPA R32 in GT4 earlier.
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
The EVO should've been RWD.
No no no no nononononononono.
If you think the Evo should be RWD you're missing the point of the Evo.
You can ignore him when he says things like that.
I probably should, but I have this didactic gene in me somewhere. It's the same part of me that keeps telling me to be a teacher instead of a financial analyst.
It's easy to find a job as a teacher, if that matters. But you'd probably be fired for swearing at idiot parents.
I hope to be at the college level as a junior professor, or at the very least in high school.
But yeah, I probably would.
Do I really swear that often?
Rarily does a post go buy that you don't use a profane word ;).
And, I wish I had known about the HPA R32 in GT4 earlier.
You're fucking kidding me! I swear that much?
;)
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
The EVO should've been RWD.
No no no no nononononononono.
If you think the Evo should be RWD you're missing the point of the Evo.
You can ignore him when he says things like that.
I probably should, but I have this didactic gene in me somewhere. It's the same part of me that keeps telling me to be a teacher instead of a financial analyst.
It's easy to find a job as a teacher, if that matters. But you'd probably be fired for swearing at idiot parents.
I think he's more concerned about money than job availability ;)
You catch on quick. Yes, money is definitely an issue. I've got big dreams, and they don't get paid for on a teacher's salary.
What's your current job? <_<
And it's not so much that you swear a lot, it's that you would probably have very, very low regard for many your students and their parents. ;)
A chick that lives a a few streets down from me (and I think is about my age) drives a previous gen GTI and I keep trying to "run into" her, to see if she's hot. :lol: Not a very aggressive driver though, I saw the car in my rear-view one day and she was dogging it. Sorry to interrupt, carry on...
P.S. Raza has no job and a mild case of Turrets.
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers. :praise:
The EVO should've been RWD.
No no no no nononononononono.
If you think the Evo should be RWD you're missing the point of the Evo.
You can ignore him when he says things like that.
I probably should, but I have this didactic gene in me somewhere. It's the same part of me that keeps telling me to be a teacher instead of a financial analyst.
It's easy to find a job as a teacher, if that matters. But you'd probably be fired for swearing at idiot parents.
I think he's more concerned about money than job availability ;)
You catch on quick. Yes, money is definitely an issue. I've got big dreams, and they don't get paid for on a teacher's salary.
What's your current job? <_<
And it's not so much that you swear a lot, it's that you would probably have very, very low regard for many your students and their parents. ;)
I work currently for Automobear (which doesn't pay) and for my dad's company (which pays well). Other than that, I'm a full time college student.
And you're right. I do have a low tolerance for idiots.
I was under the impression that you weren't working a real job. My mistake. :)
QuoteI was under the impression that you weren't working a real job. My mistake. :)
I never claimed that I was. I'm looking for a career after college, and I'm going to make two or three times most teachers make after I get my CFA.
QuoteQuoteI was under the impression that you weren't working a real job. My mistake. :)
I never claimed that I was. I'm looking for a career after college, and I'm going to make two or three times most teachers make after I get my CFA.
You just said you had a good job at your father's business. <_<
Good luck with your ambitions, you should be able to reach them unless you kill someone before you get there. ;)
QuoteQuoteQuoteI was under the impression that you weren't working a real job. My mistake. :)
I never claimed that I was. I'm looking for a career after college, and I'm going to make two or three times most teachers make after I get my CFA.
You just said you had a good job at your father's business. <_<
Good luck with your ambitions, you should be able to reach them unless you kill someone before you get there. ;)
I said it pays well, which it does. But it's not a real job. I don' t have hours or anything like that. I run errands, and have an ownership in the business. But it's not like it's a real job.