(http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/01-2011-audi-a1-630op.jpg)
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/09/officially-official-2011-audi-a1-finally-arrives/
(http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/05-2011-audi-a1.jpg)
(http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/02-2011-audi-a1.jpg)
(http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/03-2011-audi-a1.jpg)
(http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/04-2011-audi-a1.jpg)
I like it a lot, even if it reminds me of the Little Tykes Cozy Coupe.
More Pics
http://www.netcarshow.com/audi/2011-a1/
Finally...I was waitin' for this thing. I like it.
Quote from: giant_mtb on February 09, 2010, 05:32:02 PM
Finally...I was waitin' for this thing. I like it.
Too bad. Audi doesn't think we want it.
Heh. Oh well...I wouldn't buy it. :huh: :lol:
Quote from: 2o6 on February 09, 2010, 05:33:23 PM
Too bad. Audi doesn't think we want it.
I think it's great, but Audi should wait a couple more years when the fuel regulations have tightened more. It's a cool little luxury car, even has the pop up nav which was a good idea given the dash design!
My choice: Used A4. That thing looks like shit.
It looks nice enough but I wish they gave it more power, IIRC, Edmunds says top engine is a 1.4 turbo good for a paltry 122 hp. Give it around 160 and :rockon:
That two-tone isn't doing anything for me.
And-oh my-is that a backwards hat? How precious.
Quote from: Xer0 on February 09, 2010, 06:15:37 PM
It looks nice enough but I wish they gave it more power, IIRC, Edmunds says top engine is a 1.4 turbo good for a paltry 122 hp. Give it around 160 and :rockon:
Why not one more application of the 2.0T? RS1 anybody?
(http://www.americansweets.co.uk/ekmps/shops/statesidecandy/images/a1-steak-sauce-as-used-by-nigella-lawson-283g-bottle-314-p.jpg)
:lol:
Madman of the People
(http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/aa242/emmablackwoo1/GetInMyBelly.jpg)
Now this is a hotty. :rockon:
It looks cute and sporty and badass all at the same time. Really, really cool.
Quote from: 2o6 on February 09, 2010, 05:33:23 PM
Too bad. Audi doesn't think we want it.
In order for it to pass the American car regulations (also known as the
Car and Driver Order, it will need at least a V8 of 5-liters or more in engine capacity, sub-6 second 0-60 times and of course sub-14 seconds quarter mile times. If it doesn't even come close to these figures then they should keep in Europe. :evildude:
I love it. I'd probably order body-colour pillars, but that's about all I'd change. Fantastic! I love the angry little headlights with one long strip of LEDs rather than lots of silly dots, I love the wheel-at-every-corner stance, and I love the taut, clean lines. It's probably the best, most cohesive application of the Audi shield grille, too.
Didn't Audi want to go 'upmarket'?
Awesome job!
Like Wimmer said it's both cute and badass. That's exactly what a small luxury car needs to be sold. Especially small cars are bought because of their styling and appeal (Smart, Mini, 500). I can picture both an investment banker behind the steering wheel and his sexy wife.
But I couldn't picture me driving it, because I just don't like cute cars. The new Polo doesn't look cute, but with the right wheels it looks pretty badass and that's pretty much the only compact car I'd like to own right now.
Back to the A1: What I really, really like is that alloy-looking roofline. It gives the car its uniqueness to stand out of the other compact cars.
Quote from: Xer0 on February 09, 2010, 06:15:37 PM
It looks nice enough but I wish they gave it more power, IIRC, Edmunds says top engine is a 1.4 turbo good for a paltry 122 hp. Give it around 160 and :rockon:
That's the 1,4l Turbo engine from the Golf. Also available with an extra supercharger and like you said 160hp. I bet they will offer this engine very soon, too!
It's quite nice looking.
Pointless car. Apparently starts at ?14k, for what is essentially a rebadged Polo with no rear legroom and a painted roofline? And you can bet base models will be stingy as hell when it comes to equipment. I bet to make it look like the car in the pics with two tone, leather, Nav and alloys, you're looking at ?20k.
I'm sure morons will buy it in their droves because it has four rings on the front. That's the only merit this car would appear to have. This thing pales in comparison to the intelligent, spacious, efficient A2. But then nobody bought that car because it was too clever.
P.S. OT, but why does every topic you start end with an exclamation mark? Am I missing something?
Quote from: Pommes-T on February 10, 2010, 09:45:31 AM
Awesome job!
The new Polo doesn't look cute, but with the right wheels it looks pretty badass and that's pretty much the only compact car I'd like to own right now.
You've hit something here. Why is every damn new car these days styled so that it only looks decent with 18''+ alloys? WTF is the point of wheels that size on a car of this size? Not only does it take a ton of space up in accommodating the wheels, but the car rides like shit too.
Quote from: nickdrinkwater on February 10, 2010, 10:37:47 AM
Pointless car. Apparently starts at ?14k, for what is essentially a rebadged Polo with no rear legroom and a painted roofline? And you can bet base models will be stingy as hell when it comes to equipment. I bet to make it look like the car in the pics with two tone, leather, Nav and alloys, you're looking at ?20k.
I'm sure morons will buy it in their droves because it has four rings on the front. That's the only merit this car would appear to have. This thing pales in comparison to the intelligent, spacious, efficient A2. But then nobody bought that car because it was too clever.
P.S. OT, but why does every topic you start end with an exclamation mark? Am I missing something?
I only do that for new car debuts.
Even so, I think the Interior is a bit lacking compared to the Mini or even the new Citroen DS3.
This thing's pointless.
That's coming from an Audi fan.
That said, it does look quite good.
I like this a lot. Not sure I would buy one without AWD but still very cool.
Quote from: nickdrinkwater on February 10, 2010, 10:39:42 AM
You've hit something here. Why is every damn new car these days styled so that it only looks decent with 18''+ alloys? WTF is the point of wheels that size on a car of this size? Not only does it take a ton of space up in accommodating the wheels, but the car rides like shit too.
I agree with you and I don't. The Corsa always looks like shit, the Fiesta looks good, but it's not my thing like most cars in its class. What I also like is the pre-facelift Grande Punto. The rest doesn't even look good with big wheels.
I do agree with what you say about the sense of it. I even prefer the 15 inch winter rims on my dad's A6 to the 17 inch summer rims and that's a big car.
This does look soooooo damn nice anyways:
(http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/01-2010-polo-live2_580op.jpg)
Quote from: R-inge on February 10, 2010, 10:47:40 AM
I like this a lot. Not sure I would buy one without AWD but still very cool.
I don't think I would buy one with AWD.
But I wouldn't buy it over a Polo, either.
Reminds me of the Infiniti G20 in terms of execution.
Quote from: NomisR on February 10, 2010, 12:32:59 PM
Reminds me of the Infiniti G20 in terms of execution.
Good for what it was, but ultimately still lacking and too cheap.
Quote from: 2o6 on February 10, 2010, 01:19:14 PM
Good for what it was, but ultimately still lacking and too cheap.
I think it's funny that Nissan tried to sell that ugly shitbox Primera as a premium car in the USA! :lol:
Quote from: Pommes-T on February 10, 2010, 03:53:37 PM
I think it's funny that Nissan tried to sell that ugly shitbox Primera as a premium car in the USA! :lol:
The Primera wasn't bad. With good plastics, and leather appointments, it was a precursor to the Acura TSX.
Not liking the interior around the shifter. Looks like a tupperware container forced under the dash.
I don't dislike it, but it's really not doing anything for me. It's not special enough - despite the fancy details like the grille (which I don't care for) and the silver trim, it's just lacking something....looks ordinary. I think the Mini succeeds because it just looks different, so singular and purposeful, and has such broad appeal.
I think the A2 was much better.
Yeah, MINI over this just based on character alone.
Quote from: Hachee on February 11, 2010, 09:06:12 AM
I don't dislike it, but it's really not doing anything for me. It's not special enough - despite the fancy details like the grille (which I don't care for) and the silver trim, it's just lacking something....looks ordinary. I think the Mini succeeds because it just looks different, so singular and purposeful, and has such broad appeal.
I think the A2 was much better.
The A2 may have been cleverer, but it looked like the lovechild of a TT and an Aztek.
(http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/kk215/kplex/AUDI20A22016FSI201.jpg)
It's just been confirmed that this car is NOT heading towards the US. It's going to be sold in Europe and parts of Asia only.
Quote from: cawimmer430 on February 12, 2010, 07:43:03 AM
It's just been confirmed that this car is NOT heading towards the US. It's going to be sold in Europe and parts of Asia only.
(http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/12/500x_audi_a1.jpg)
Er bringt sexy zur?ck. Funny, this commercial was filmed in LA.
Maybe it's a photoshop! Why would they have that crazy license plate on there if it was in LA?!!?!?!
To tell the truth, I don't want it. It's FWD only.
Quote from: the Teuton on February 12, 2010, 07:48:51 AM
(http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/12/500x_audi_a1.jpg)
Er bringt sexy zur?ck. Funny, this commercial was filmed in LA.
And that's clearly a European-spec Audi A1 in the photo. If it were an American version it would have those funny orange reflectors upfront. European car companies do this all the time. They bring over a Euro-spec model for filming purposes in the US.
its r0tary?!?!?!?
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/02/geneva-2010-audi-a1-e-tron-wankels-its-way-to-the-show-floor/
Quote from: r0tor on March 02, 2010, 04:39:17 PM
its r0tary?!?!?!?
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/02/geneva-2010-audi-a1-e-tron-wankels-its-way-to-the-show-floor/
I was going to start a thread "Audi goes back to rOtor", but just did not have the time. With DSU Audi does have rotary credentials.
I have wondered why GM did not use a small turbine for the generator, I suppose a wankel will work as well in terms os smoothness.
Contrary to most knowledge, the wankle design is actually more fuel efficient at wide open throttle then a piston engine (which is how they will use this engine). So the r0tary design makes great sense for a small generator.
The fuel efficiency is actually one of the large reasons why the 787B won at LeMans.
Quote from: r0tor on March 02, 2010, 05:48:15 PM
Contrary to most knowledge, the wankle design is actually more fuel efficient at wide open throttle then a piston engine (which is how they will use this engine). So the r0tary design makes great sense for a small generator.
The fuel efficiency is actually one of the large reasons why the 787B won at LeMans.
Hmm...
Our old 12A powered street port RX-7 racecar seems to disagree with that.