CarSPIN Forums

Auto Talk => The Fast Lane => Topic started by: TurboDan on April 28, 2012, 01:06:02 PM

Title: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: TurboDan on April 28, 2012, 01:06:02 PM
Looks like the BlueSport idea has lived to see another day, after all.

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/282385/baby_boxster_on_way.html

I wonder how Porsche would differentiate their version of this car from the VW and Audi versions. Otherwise, I would think the Audi/Porsche versions might overlap to some extent. I like the idea of a mid-engine VW two seat convertible, though, A LOT. If they announced it, I'd probably throw down a couple ground to pre-order one even now. I've been in love with the BlueSport since it was first shown as a concept.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Rupert on April 28, 2012, 01:27:50 PM
OH LOOK ANOTHER 911
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Eye of the Tiger on April 28, 2012, 01:29:28 PM
Quote from: Rupert on April 28, 2012, 01:27:50 PM
OH LOOK ANOTHER 911

Beetle Sport?
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Rupert on April 28, 2012, 01:31:53 PM
I just want to see a Porsche with a different nose. Back view of this car is a bit MR2, actually.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Cookie Monster on April 28, 2012, 02:29:50 PM
I'm going to wait to see if there will be a baby Cayman before getting too excited.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Onslaught on April 28, 2012, 03:50:27 PM
Looks like a 911 and MR2 had sex and this came out 9 months later.
Porsche snobs won't think of it as a "real" porsche either.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Payman on April 28, 2012, 07:05:22 PM
If this weighs and is priced close to a Miata, I will have one.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: ifcar on April 28, 2012, 07:08:12 PM
Quote from: Onslaught on April 28, 2012, 03:50:27 PM
Looks like a 911 and MR2 had sex and this came out 9 months later.
Porsche snobs won't think of it as a "real" porsche either.

Did they ever come around on the Boxster?
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: TurboDan on April 28, 2012, 07:26:35 PM
Quote from: Rupert on April 28, 2012, 01:31:53 PM
I just want to see a Porsche with a different nose. Back view of this car is a bit MR2, actually.

In all fairness, the MR2 was a pretty good looking car.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Soup DeVille on April 28, 2012, 07:30:20 PM
Quote from: Onslaught on April 28, 2012, 03:50:27 PM
Looks like a 911 and MR2 had sex and this came out 9 months later.
Porsche snobs won't think of it as a "real" porsche either.

I'd rather have a cheap sports car that's called a Porsche than a four door sedan and an SUV.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Rupert on April 28, 2012, 11:55:41 PM
Quote from: TurboDan on April 28, 2012, 07:26:35 PM
In all fairness, the MR2 was a pretty good looking car.

Not really, but my point is that the Porsche nose is getting really old.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: S204STi on April 28, 2012, 11:56:11 PM
Looks slick.  I like it.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Onslaught on April 29, 2012, 04:48:42 AM
Quote from: ifcar on April 28, 2012, 07:08:12 PM
Did they ever come around on the Boxster?
I know a few that have. And many that haven't.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Raza on April 29, 2012, 09:59:47 AM
For everyone complaining, I don't think this is a finalized model yet.  Will it have a family resemblance?  No doubt.  But from the sound of the article, the project isn't even greenlit yet, so it's a bit early to be upset.  "Planned" cars don't always come to fruition.

Anyway, I'm interested. 
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Payman on April 29, 2012, 10:00:44 AM
Quote from: Rupert on April 28, 2012, 11:55:41 PM
Not really, but my point is that the Porsche nose is getting really old.

Most of us like it that way. It's an iconic look that Porsche makes its $Texas on.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Eye of the Tiger on April 29, 2012, 10:01:44 AM
For the styling, they should ditch the "fambly resamblance", and do a retro 914.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Payman on April 29, 2012, 10:05:15 AM
Quote from: Eye of the Tiger on April 29, 2012, 10:01:44 AM
For the styling, they should ditch the "fambly resamblance", and do a retro 914.

Bring back hideaway lights!
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Raza on April 29, 2012, 10:31:27 AM
Quote from: Eye of the Tiger on April 29, 2012, 10:01:44 AM
For the styling, they should ditch the "fambly resamblance", and do a retro 914.

I'd be okay with that.  Like this sketch from a few years back. 

(http://uber-werks.com/images/914history/concept.jpg)

Motor Trend's vision of a 914.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: cawimmer430 on April 29, 2012, 11:37:23 AM
Great idea. An "affordable" and fun car for the "masses".  :ohyeah:
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Galaxy on April 29, 2012, 01:29:10 PM
Quote from: Rockraven on April 28, 2012, 07:05:22 PM
If this weighs and is priced close to a Miata, I will have one.

The VW version might price close. Perhaps.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Rupert on April 29, 2012, 01:39:49 PM
Quote from: Onslaught on April 29, 2012, 04:48:42 AM
I know a few that have. And many that haven't.

Those guys are pretty funny. It's like saying anyone who drives a Ford without manual timing advance isn't driving a real Ford.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Rupert on April 29, 2012, 01:40:11 PM
Quote from: Rockraven on April 29, 2012, 10:00:44 AM
Most of us like it that way. It's an iconic look that Porsche makes its $Texas on.

Yeah, it's fine on the 911.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: 68_427 on April 29, 2012, 02:19:07 PM
 Needs a 2.0L H6.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Soup DeVille on April 29, 2012, 03:20:06 PM
Quote from: cawimmer430 on April 29, 2012, 11:37:23 AM
Great idea. An "affordable" and fun car for the "masses".  :ohyeah:
A "wagen" for the "volk?"
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Soup DeVille on April 29, 2012, 03:20:49 PM
Quote from: Rupert on April 29, 2012, 01:39:49 PM
Those guys are pretty funny. It's like saying anyone who drives a Ford without manual timing advance isn't driving a real Ford.

I still say that a Bugatti with front brakes isn't a real Bugatti.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: TurboDan on April 29, 2012, 06:37:32 PM
Quote from: Soup DeVille on April 29, 2012, 03:20:06 PM
A "wagen" for the "volk?"

Honestly, I think it would work. I know we have a lot of MX-5/Miata fans here, but let's face it, the car is outrageously dated. The MR2 is dead since Toyota decided to start making appliances instead of cars. The Solstice and Sky died with their respective marques. The Z4 is expensive. That leaves room for an affordable roadster that handles well, offers a nice interior and amenities and is made by a brand people trust.

If it's mid-engine, I'd consider that a quirky novelty, not a disadvantage.

I do think, however, that making VW, Audi and Porsche versions of the same car would dilute the market to an extent, though. Honestly, I think I'd go for the VW or Porsche version. Audi would probably design it like the TT, which never appealed to me.
Title: Re: Sub-Boxster Model Being Considered Again by Porsche
Post by: Soup DeVille on April 29, 2012, 07:04:41 PM
Quote from: TurboDan on April 29, 2012, 06:37:32 PM
Honestly, I think it would work.

So do I, I was just pointing out the irony of it