How low can you go?

Started by VTEC_Inside, June 14, 2010, 07:48:21 PM

VTEC_Inside

Bit of a rant thread here.

My idiot friend with the NSX is going to drop it another inch or so tomorrow. The only reason he wants to do this is because he thinks it has too much wheel gap in the back.

The car was purchased with Tein coil-overs on it, so its just a few turns of a wrench.

The thing is that the car rides quite nicely as it sits. I feel its more comfortable than my RSX, and it still handles quite literally like its on rails.

It also has less than 1cm of clearance under the front lip as he pulls into his driveway.

I told him that I'd drive it into his driveway just once so he can see what I see, but he just doesn't think I'm serious.

To make matters worse, there is a bit of a dip in his driveway just before the garage, where I could swear the bottom of the car almost touches the asphalt...

Arg... Not that hes going to listen to me any more than he has in the last couple months that I've tried to convince him otherwise....

Pic for reference, thats my RSX behind it for height comparisson:
Honda, The Heartbeat of Japan...
2018 Honda Accord Sport 2.0T 6MT 252hp 273lb/ft
2006 Acura CSX Touring 160hp 141lb/ft *Sons car now*
2004 Acura RSX Type S 6spd 200hp 142lb/ft
1989 Honda Accord Coupe LX 5spd 2bbl 98hp 109lb/ft *GONE*
Slushies are something to drink, not drive...

giant_mtb

It looks perfect.  He's silly.

The Pirate

Yeah, that's perfect.  And amazing.  I love the NSX.

What year?  NSX or NSX-T?  Manual, I hope.
1989 Audi 80 quattro, 2001 Mazda Protege ES

Secretary of the "I Survived the Volvo S80 thread" Club

Quote from: omicron on July 10, 2007, 10:58:12 PM
After you wake up with the sun at 6am on someone's floor, coughing up cigarette butts and tasting like warm beer, you may well change your opinion on this matter.

VTEC_Inside

Quote from: The Pirate on June 14, 2010, 08:00:08 PM
Yeah, that's perfect.  And amazing.  I love the NSX.

What year?  NSX or NSX-T?  Manual, I hope.

1992 5spd.
Honda, The Heartbeat of Japan...
2018 Honda Accord Sport 2.0T 6MT 252hp 273lb/ft
2006 Acura CSX Touring 160hp 141lb/ft *Sons car now*
2004 Acura RSX Type S 6spd 200hp 142lb/ft
1989 Honda Accord Coupe LX 5spd 2bbl 98hp 109lb/ft *GONE*
Slushies are something to drink, not drive...

VTEC_Inside

I'm having another bitch fest with him right now over it, getting no where...

Honda, The Heartbeat of Japan...
2018 Honda Accord Sport 2.0T 6MT 252hp 273lb/ft
2006 Acura CSX Touring 160hp 141lb/ft *Sons car now*
2004 Acura RSX Type S 6spd 200hp 142lb/ft
1989 Honda Accord Coupe LX 5spd 2bbl 98hp 109lb/ft *GONE*
Slushies are something to drink, not drive...

giant_mtb

Just let him do it.  He'll be the sorry one when he's scraping his shit everywhere and bumping his tires on his fenders over bumps.  :ohyeah:

SVT_Power

I wouldn't say that's too low as is. I can see the desire to go a bit lower.

But in my books, top of fender flush with the wheel is the minimum. I like my cars low  :huh:
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit'. And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." - Ayrton Senna

280Z Turbo

You need suspension travel or else your car will handle like crap.

Raza

Oh god...did he buy the offroad model?  Hideous wheel gap. 
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

hotrodalex

I would lower it at least an inch or get larger tires. That gap does not belong on an NSX.

Cookie Monster

It's a large gap but if he can't go any lower I'd keep it as is.
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

omicron

If that's him wearing a hood in the photo, that explains this nonsensical desire for having the front wheels poking up through the fenders.

If not, well, I'm sure he was wearing a hood just out of shot.

Raza

Quote from: hotrodalex on June 15, 2010, 09:22:26 AM
I would lower it at least an inch or get larger tires. That gap does not belong on an NSX.
Quote from: thecarnut on June 15, 2010, 09:30:43 AM
It's a large gap but if he can't go any lower I'd keep it as is.
Quote from: SVT_Power on June 14, 2010, 11:01:32 PM
I wouldn't say that's too low as is. I can see the desire to go a bit lower.

But in my books, top of fender flush with the wheel is the minimum. I like my cars low  :huh:

Just to confirm, you guys aren't joking, right?
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

Cookie Monster

RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

hotrodalex

I'm not joking. I think he should get it lowered. :huh:

VTEC_Inside

Quote from: omicron on June 15, 2010, 10:04:57 AM
If that's him wearing a hood in the photo, that explains this nonsensical desire for having the front wheels poking up through the fenders.

If not, well, I'm sure he was wearing a hood just out of shot.

Nah, that's one of my other buddies, he drives a bone stock '05 325xi.
Honda, The Heartbeat of Japan...
2018 Honda Accord Sport 2.0T 6MT 252hp 273lb/ft
2006 Acura CSX Touring 160hp 141lb/ft *Sons car now*
2004 Acura RSX Type S 6spd 200hp 142lb/ft
1989 Honda Accord Coupe LX 5spd 2bbl 98hp 109lb/ft *GONE*
Slushies are something to drink, not drive...

VTEC_Inside

Here is the thing, I can understand wanting to get rid of the wheel gap, but not at the expense of ride quality and general drive-ability.

I'm not exaggerating when I say that the front lip comes within a centimeter of the ground as is. He even put a new lip on it after he bought it because the old one was chewed up a bit. How many $125 lips its going to take before he realizes hes an idiot I dunno.

The other thing is that the previous owner had the car corner balanced. He tracked the car on occasion. It really is setup quite sweet from a performance standpoint.

As of this morning we are no longer friends on facebook, lol... I called him a dumbass on his wall because he didn't know what people meant by "counting the turns" on his coilovers.

Honda, The Heartbeat of Japan...
2018 Honda Accord Sport 2.0T 6MT 252hp 273lb/ft
2006 Acura CSX Touring 160hp 141lb/ft *Sons car now*
2004 Acura RSX Type S 6spd 200hp 142lb/ft
1989 Honda Accord Coupe LX 5spd 2bbl 98hp 109lb/ft *GONE*
Slushies are something to drink, not drive...

Rich

I don't know why people are obsessed over wheel gap.  GM HD trucks?  Yeah, too much gap.  This?:



Looks great, IMO
2003 Mazda Miata 5MT; 2005 Subaru Impreza Outback Sport 4AT

Cookie Monster

Quote from: VTEC_Inside on June 15, 2010, 10:48:44 AM
Here is the thing, I can understand wanting to get rid of the wheel gap, but not at the expense of ride quality and general drive-ability.

I'm not exaggerating when I say that the front lip comes within a centimeter of the ground as is. He even put a new lip on it after he bought it because the old one was chewed up a bit. How many $125 lips its going to take before he realizes hes an idiot I dunno.

The other thing is that the previous owner had the car corner balanced. He tracked the car on occasion. It really is setup quite sweet from a performance standpoint.

As of this morning we are no longer friends on facebook, lol... I called him a dumbass on his wall because he didn't know what people meant by "counting the turns" on his coilovers.


Yeah, in his case I definitely wouldn't lower it, but in general, on a sports car like that I'd like to have a smaller wheel gap
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

hotrodalex

Quote from: HotRodPilot on June 15, 2010, 11:44:20 AM
I don't know why people are obsessed over wheel gap.  GM HD trucks?  Yeah, too much gap.  This?:



Looks great, IMO

Doesn't look horrible from the angle, but I rarely look at cars while lying on the ground. I like the tires to be on the edge of the fender, it just looks right. I'm not saying I'm going to lower a family Accord or Camry to eliminate any gap, but it's a sports car. It's supposed to look sporty.

Rupert

It's supposed to drive sporty, and looks come second. :huh:
Novarolla-Miata-Trooper-Jeep-Volvo-Trooper-Ranger-MGB-Explorer-944-Fiat-Alfa-XTerra

13 cars, 60 cylinders, 52 manual forward gears and 9 automatic, 2 FWD, 42 doors, 1988 average year of manufacture, 3 convertibles, 22 average mpg, and no wheel covers.
PRO TENACIA NULLA VIA EST INVIA

hotrodalex

Quote from: Rupert on June 15, 2010, 05:10:36 PM
It's supposed to drive sporty, and looks come second. :huh:

Lowering it one inch won't change how it drives if you do it correctly.

SVT_Power

"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit'. And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." - Ayrton Senna

VTEC_Inside

Quote from: hotrodalex on June 16, 2010, 10:39:17 AM
Lowering it one inch won't change how it drives if you do it correctly.

The dampers are adjustable as well, so I'm sure it can be done without affecting the ride all that much. That's not the ultimate problem in this case though.
Honda, The Heartbeat of Japan...
2018 Honda Accord Sport 2.0T 6MT 252hp 273lb/ft
2006 Acura CSX Touring 160hp 141lb/ft *Sons car now*
2004 Acura RSX Type S 6spd 200hp 142lb/ft
1989 Honda Accord Coupe LX 5spd 2bbl 98hp 109lb/ft *GONE*
Slushies are something to drink, not drive...

hotrodalex

Quote from: VTEC_Inside on June 16, 2010, 12:44:46 PM
The dampers are adjustable as well, so I'm sure it can be done without affecting the ride all that much. That's not the ultimate problem in this case though.

Exactly. The only problem with lowering it is the fact that it will scrape the curb. I don't see that as a fault of the car but a fault of the curb. :lol:

Rupert

Quote from: hotrodalex on June 16, 2010, 10:39:17 AM
Lowering it one inch won't change how it drives if you do it correctly.

Right, but my point was larger.
Novarolla-Miata-Trooper-Jeep-Volvo-Trooper-Ranger-MGB-Explorer-944-Fiat-Alfa-XTerra

13 cars, 60 cylinders, 52 manual forward gears and 9 automatic, 2 FWD, 42 doors, 1988 average year of manufacture, 3 convertibles, 22 average mpg, and no wheel covers.
PRO TENACIA NULLA VIA EST INVIA

sportyaccordy

As a habitual car lowerer, I must say his NSX is fine where it is. The angle of the picture makes things look worse than they are. The NSX is incredibly low, and I imagine will be pretty sensitive to such an extreme suspension geometry change.

Not to mention, IIRC, Tein coilovers can only be adjusted in such a way that lowering the car takes away from the range of motion available to the dampers.

So aesthetically and functionally it seems a bit silly. I'd almost prefer that he get 1" bigger wheels for it than lower it more, but even that would be unnecessary....

Tave

Quote from: hotrodalex on June 15, 2010, 03:00:33 PM
Doesn't look horrible from the angle, but I rarely look at cars while lying on the ground.

That angle makes the gap look as large as it can look.
As I write, highly civilized human beings are flying overhead, trying to kill me.

Quote from: thecarnut on March 16, 2008, 10:33:43 AM
Depending on price, that could be a good deal.

Tave

I like it when the gap is symmetrical. Lower it too far, and the gap at the top disappears, but the gaps to the front and rear of the tires stay the same, and it looks uneven. No me gusta.
As I write, highly civilized human beings are flying overhead, trying to kill me.

Quote from: thecarnut on March 16, 2008, 10:33:43 AM
Depending on price, that could be a good deal.

hotrodalex

Quote from: Tave on June 20, 2010, 08:08:08 PM
That angle makes the gap look as large as it can look.

I've seen worse angles.