Twins! (Part Eight)

Started by 2o6, January 28, 2011, 08:57:06 PM

Which?

Audi TT 3.2 Quattro
15 (93.8%)
Volkswagen Golf R32 (MKV)
1 (6.3%)

Total Members Voted: 15

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

2o6

January 28, 2011, 08:57:06 PM




Same engine. Both have AWD. Both have either a DSG or a 6MT.


Which do you choose. I was going to do the MKIV R32 and the 1st gen TT (I think the 1st gen TT looks better than the new one) but I didn't realize the 3.2 old TT was DSG only.

68_427

#1
January 28, 2011, 09:00:37 PM
R32 is dsg only.
Quotewhere were you when automotive dream died
i was sat at home drinking brake fluid when wife ring
'racecar is die'
no

Raza

#2
January 28, 2011, 09:01:40 PM
TT for me.  The R32 was DSG only in the US, otherwise it would have been my choice.  If this were England, R32 all the fucking way.  All the performance, without the attitude, and much more utility.  The DSG is the only reason I don't own an R32 right now. 
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close

2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

2o6

#3
January 28, 2011, 09:03:05 PM
Quote from: 68_427 on January 28, 2011, 09:00:37 PM
R32 is dsg only.

Aargh.

R32 is too plebeian looking in the flesh. The TT looks awesome.

SVT666

#4
January 28, 2011, 09:04:55 PM
TT all the way.  Sexy as hell.

Rupert

#6
January 28, 2011, 09:11:45 PM
Audi. As if anyone would vote for the VW. :lol:
Novarolla-Miata-Trooper-Jeep-Volvo-Trooper-Ranger-MGB-Explorer-944-Fiat-Alfa-XTerra

13 cars, 60 cylinders, 52 manual forward gears and 9 automatic, 2 FWD, 42 doors, 1988 average year of manufacture, 3 convertibles, 22 average mpg, and no wheel covers.
PRO TENACIA NULLA VIA EST INVIA

2o6

#7
January 28, 2011, 09:13:44 PM
I should have stepped the generation back.

Onslaught

#8
January 29, 2011, 07:05:35 AM
TT

And then I'd sell it.

68_427

#9
January 29, 2011, 07:12:10 AM
Quote from: Raza  on January 28, 2011, 09:01:40 PM
TT for me.  The R32 was DSG only in the US, otherwise it would have been my choice.  If this were England, R32 all the fucking way.  All the performance, without the attitude, and much more utility.  The DSG is the only reason I don't own an R32 right now. 

Having kids is the only reason my mom doesn't own a R32 right now.
Quotewhere were you when automotive dream died
i was sat at home drinking brake fluid when wife ring
'racecar is die'
no

Tave

#10
January 29, 2011, 09:51:40 AM
TT is sex.
As I write, highly civilized human beings are flying overhead, trying to kill me.

Quote from: thecarnut on March 16, 2008, 10:33:43 AM
Depending on price, that could be a good deal.

2o6

#11
January 29, 2011, 12:38:01 PM
Darn. I picked these two because I thought it would be more balanced out.....

68_427

#12
January 29, 2011, 12:53:12 PM
What about Golf R vs TT-S?
Quotewhere were you when automotive dream died
i was sat at home drinking brake fluid when wife ring
'racecar is die'
no

sportyaccordy

#13
January 29, 2011, 01:56:48 PM
2 more seats for only a 100# penalty

I'm gonna buck convention and go with the R32

Same engine, more practicality, about equal performance, significant discount

TT looks good, but not THAT good.

giant_mtb

#14
January 29, 2011, 02:21:55 PM
I'm young and utility isn't at the top of my priority list, so I went with the TT.  In a few years, I'd probably have chosen the R32 for its extra space.  But yeah.

CALL_911

#15
January 29, 2011, 03:22:37 PM
TT is teh hawt. I'll take it.


2004 S2000
2016 340xi
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions