Viper GTS... just a crappier version of the ZR1.

Started by 565, December 23, 2012, 05:59:51 PM

565

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1212_2013_chevrolet_corvette_zr1_srt_viper_gts/

Despite being on its way out, the ZR1 hands one last blow to the new contender, it's still more civilized, better value, and more capable.  A 2.1 second margin around Laguna seca is huge.  May the C7 take the vette to even greater heights.

GoCougs

Not one to be a huge Corvette cheerleader, but yeah, the Corvette's generally always been the better car.

I've never been a fan of the Viper - it's just tried too hard to be "crude." There is no reason for the Viper's comfort and driveability deficiencies in a car today.

Lebowski

I would never buy a viper. The daily driveability shortcomings vs a corvette are not worth it and never have been.

SVT666

The ACR will crush the ZR1, but yeah,  the Viper is not a good daily car.

LonghornTX

I thought that was a pretty weak article, and after having watched Pobst drive in some of their other comparisons, I don't think he was capable of extracting that much from the Viper. I will wait to see comparisons from more established performance mags like R&T and C&D before I judge whether the ZR1, which BTW is much more expensive than a base Viper w/ track pack, is actually the superior performance car. MT just seems to thrive on putting out flame bait articles, not decent auto journalism.

Frankly, the Viper is substantially better looking inside and out and is much more exclusive to own. For me, that matters, because Corvettes are pretty common, while Vipers are a bit more special. However, I would imagine the C7 will jump substantially forward in all things vs. the C6, though the styling looks pretty lame to me right now (Ferrari front end with no circular taillights). I also know for a fact, since I met people working on the Viper, that there is substantially more performance available from the car.
Difficult takes a day, impossible takes a week.

Onslaught

Never been a fan of the Vipers. It's just too American for me. Big, loud, cheap looking and looks like a rednecks wet dream.
My understanding is it's a good motor looking for a car to be put in.

LonghornTX

Quote from: Onslaught on December 23, 2012, 09:16:56 PM
Never been a fan of the Vipers. It's just too American for me. Big, loud, cheap looking and looks like a rednecks wet dream.
My understanding is it's a good motor looking for a car to be put in.
The new one changes much of that, especially on the inside. The fitment and build quality is on a whole different level compared to the last generation. And I will remind you that the last gen ACR is still one of the fastest track day specials in the world, bar none.
Difficult takes a day, impossible takes a week.

GoCougs

Quote from: SVT666 on December 23, 2012, 09:06:59 PM
The ACR will crush the ZR1, but yeah,  the Viper is not a good daily car.

Not only is this tested Viper laughably expensive ($125k base, $142k as tested) which likely precludes an even more expensive (ACR) version, the ZR1 is a 4 model years old and is based on a car 9 years old. The ZR1 of the C7 variety will be that much more monster.

LonghornTX

Quote from: GoCougs on December 23, 2012, 10:15:08 PM
Not only is this tested Viper laughably expensive ($125k base, $142k as tested) which likely precludes an even more expensive (ACR) version, the ZR1 is a 4 model years old and is based on a car 9 years old. The ZR1 of the C7 variety will be that much more monster.
It is also possibly one of the most highly developed sports cars in the world, wearing probably the stickiest tires you can buy. There will be an ACR, bet on it.
Difficult takes a day, impossible takes a week.

280Z Turbo


GoCougs

No car with leaf springs is "highly developed." The race variants of the C6 have different suspension and chassis. GM's technical prowess is in the magnetic particle shocks and brakes.

The same-weight-as-the-ZR1 Viper not only has 50/50 weight distribution its Pirellis are both wider and have a lol treadwear of 60.

giant_mtb

If someone was offering me a Viper and a Corvette for no cost and I could choose just one of the two...it'd be the Viper.  No questions asked.  Corvettes are very accessible compared to Vipers...Vipers still hold a mystique and badassness that the 'Vette cannot compete with.

SVT666

Quote from: LonghornTX on December 23, 2012, 09:07:00 PM
I thought that was a pretty weak article, and after having watched Pobst drive in some of their other comparisons, I don't think he was capable of extracting that much from the Viper. I will wait to see comparisons from more established performance mags like R&T and C&D before I judge whether the ZR1, which BTW is much more expensive than a base Viper w/ track pack, is actually the superior performance car. MT just seems to thrive on putting out flame bait articles, not decent auto journalism.

Frankly, the Viper is substantially better looking inside and out and is much more exclusive to own. For me, that matters, because Corvettes are pretty common, while Vipers are a bit more special. However, I would imagine the C7 will jump substantially forward in all things vs. the C6, though the styling looks pretty lame to me right now (Ferrari front end with no circular taillights). I also know for a fact, since I met people working on the Viper, that there is substantially more performance available from the car.

Pobst is an accomplished pro race car driver.  I trust his abilities.  The ZR1 has those magneto shocks that seem to make a huge difference in any car they are installed on.

Eye of the Tiger

Quote from: GoCougs on December 23, 2012, 10:48:57 PM
No car with leaf springs is "highly developed." The race variants of the C6 have different suspension and chassis. GM's technical prowess is in the magnetic particle shocks and brakes.

The same-weight-as-the-ZR1 Viper not only has 50/50 weight distribution its Pirellis are both wider and have a lol treadwear of 60.

You don't seem to understand that the leaf springs in Corvettes have several advantages over conventional coils, such as reduced unsprung weight, decreased fatigue rate, and compact packaging. It turns out to be an excellent setup for a high performance street car. The reason the race variants use coilovers is for ease of servicing and parts availability, as they may use different a coil spring and/or damper for each race.
2008 TUNDRA (Truck Ultra-wideband Never-say-die Daddy Rottweiler Awesome)

LonghornTX

Quote from: SVT666 on December 24, 2012, 01:05:00 AM
Pobst is an accomplished pro race car driver.  I trust his abilities.  The ZR1 has those magneto shocks that seem to make a huge difference in any car they are installed on.
He is a race driver, yes, but he doesnt seem to be the type that can handle cars like that very well, at least after having watched the other videos he has done for MT
Difficult takes a day, impossible takes a week.

LonghornTX

Quote from: GoCougs on December 23, 2012, 10:48:57 PM
No car with leaf springs is "highly developed." The race variants of the C6 have different suspension and chassis. GM's technical prowess is in the magnetic particle shocks and brakes.

The same-weight-as-the-ZR1 Viper not only has 50/50 weight distribution its Pirellis are both wider and have a lol treadwear of 60.
A car with a team of people the size of Corvette's is most certainly highly developed. As a platform, that car gets refined almost every year. Few other cars in its class (save the 911) can claim to have the amount of engineering resources behind it. Team Viper is tiny by comparison. BTW, their brakes are made by Brembo. Most manufacturers outsource their brakes (Viper uses stoptech).

Tread wear does not equal grip. While the viper has wider rubber, those pirellis are not even close to cups.
Difficult takes a day, impossible takes a week.

S204STi

Quote from: SVT666 on December 24, 2012, 01:05:00 AM
Pobst is an accomplished pro race car driver.  I trust his abilities.  The ZR1 has those magneto shocks that seem to make a huge difference in any car they are installed on.

Look at this shocks this way: most race tuning is based around the most important section of the track - where you will make or break a lap.  These shocks in a way allow you to practically tune to any corner, since you aren't stuck with one compression/rebound setting.  It makes all the difference in the world.

While I'm not a big fan of the packaging compromise found in the transverse leaf springs, there is no denying the Corvette is a heavily tuned beast even in stock form.  They've basically had to fiddle with it constantly, much like Porsche with the 911, to overcome packaging constraints.  Seems like a huge success so far...

GoCougs

Quote from: Eye of the Tiger on December 24, 2012, 05:14:08 AM
You don't seem to understand that the leaf springs in Corvettes have several advantages over conventional coils, such as reduced unsprung weight, decreased fatigue rate, and compact packaging. It turns out to be an excellent setup for a high performance street car. The reason the race variants use coilovers is for ease of servicing and parts availability, as they may use different a coil spring and/or damper for each race.

The only advantage is they're a Corvette legacy throwback dating back 50 years. If they were all that and a bag of chips other sports cars (and exotics) would use them, let alone other GM hi-po vehicles.

GoCougs

Quote from: LonghornTX on December 24, 2012, 09:46:36 AM
He is a race driver, yes, but he doesnt seem to be the type that can handle cars like that very well, at least after having watched the other videos he has done for MT

By his legacy alone we can safely deduce that he handles them very well.

GoCougs

Quote from: LonghornTX on December 24, 2012, 09:53:05 AM
A car with a team of people the size of Corvette's is most certainly highly developed. As a platform, that car gets refined almost every year. Few other cars in its class (save the 911) can claim to have the amount of engineering resources behind it. Team Viper is tiny by comparison. BTW, their brakes are made by Brembo. Most manufacturers outsource their brakes (Viper uses stoptech).

Tread wear does not equal grip. While the viper has wider rubber, those pirellis are not even close to cups.

So what are all these resources doing while the C6 sits stale (itself an iteration of the 8-year-old C5) for 9 model years? Sure they have a team but it's nothing ginormous.

We can safely deduce that the Pirellis are fairly close to the Sport Cups in grip not only by treadwear by lateral grip and braking stats.

GM tells Brembo how to design its brakes. Brembo simply doesn't pull some random stuff off the shelf and ship it to GM. And there is more than just the HW; notably the ABS and stability control systems.

LonghornTX

Quote from: GoCougs on December 24, 2012, 10:33:07 AM
By his legacy alone we can safely deduce that he handles them very well.
Not all racing drivers are created equal. His success came largely from SPEED touring/gt class wins where he drove sedans.
Difficult takes a day, impossible takes a week.

LonghornTX

Quote from: GoCougs on December 24, 2012, 10:50:07 AM
So what are all these resources doing while the C6 sits stale (itself an iteration of the 8-year-old C5) for 9 model years? Sure they have a team but it's nothing ginormous.

We can safely deduce that the Pirellis are fairly close to the Sport Cups in grip not only by treadwear by lateral grip and braking stats.

GM tells Brembo how to design its brakes. Brembo simply doesn't pull some random stuff off the shelf and ship it to GM. And there is more than just the HW; notably the ABS and stability control systems.
Doing engineering work, testing new parts, tuning the car. Clearly, you are not too familiar with automotive delevopment. And for a niche product like a sports car, Corvette has a massive team.

Again, tread wear does not equal grip. The viper is able to put up similar static figures namely because it has much more rubber on the ground, but there is more to running on a track than braking in a straight line and cornering at a constant radius. There is a reason the ACR ran cups, they are simply the most track capable tire that can still be street driven. One need only look at the treads of the two tires to see their purposes.

Actually, for the carbon ceramics, they are pretty much off the shelf and are very similar to the ones Ferrari uses. But yes, their tuning of the abs and stability systems is proprietary. Again, this is where having a large team and lots of cash help because those tuning processes take a lot of time.
Difficult takes a day, impossible takes a week.

MX793

Quote from: GoCougs on December 24, 2012, 10:50:07 AM
So what are all these resources doing while the C6 sits stale (itself an iteration of the 8-year-old C5) for 9 model years? Sure they have a team but it's nothing ginormous.

We can safely deduce that the Pirellis are fairly close to the Sport Cups in grip not only by treadwear by lateral grip and braking stats.

GM tells Brembo how to design its brakes. Brembo simply doesn't pull some random stuff off the shelf and ship it to GM. And there is more than just the HW; notably the ABS and stability control systems.

C6 is not a refreshed C5.  It was a new car.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

GoCougs

Quote from: MX793 on December 24, 2012, 11:37:56 AM
C6 is not a refreshed C5.  It was a new car.

I didn't use the word "refresh." It's a new car but a relatively minor (mechanical) iteration of the C5 notably in the space frame chassis, F/R suspension and engine.

MrH

Well, I mostly agree with Longhorn here. The Cup tires are a pretty big advantage. Chrysler is claiming Pobst has always struggled with the Viper and he wasn't as close to the limits as he thought he was. I buy both of those claims. At the same time, the vette's shocks are still the top dog in the game. Not sure what the shocks on the Viper are like. I know they're adjustable, but I'm guessing it's mechanical manipulation of the valving? Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

But I would take the Viper any day over the corvette. Vipers are special in a way few other cars are. The V10, the looks, the sound, the proportions... It's definitely a car I'd have in my garage if I won the lottery. It's the ultimate American Muscle hammer of a car.

Been in tons of corvettes, and it just doesn't compare to the ridiculousness of the Viper. If it was a daily driver though, the corvette would be easier to live with. Apparently the new Viper has closed that gap though.
2023 Ford Lightning Lariat ER
2019 Acura RDX SH-AWD
2023 BRZ Limited

Previous: '02 Mazda Protege5, '08 Mazda Miata, '05 Toyota Tacoma, '09 Honda Element, '13 Subaru BRZ, '14 Hyundai Genesis R-Spec 5.0, '15 Toyota 4Runner SR5, '18 Honda Accord EX-L 2.0t, '01 Honda S2000, '20 Subaru Outback XT, '23 Chevy Bolt EUV

Char

Lap times are all about confidence, and apparently the ZR1s trick shocks provide enough of it to allow the driver to exploit it's ablilities.
Quote from: 565 on December 26, 2012, 09:13:44 AM
... Nissan needs to use these shocks on the GT-R.  It would be like the Incredible Hulk wielding Thor's hammer.... unstoppable.

MexicoCityM3

Pobst is a biased idiot, he lost all credibility with me in the M/T 1M group test with his absolutely outrageous and outlier comments. At the time he was getting his ass kicked week in and week out in the ALMS by the Rahal M3s.

The Corvette is the better car here, but the Viper has always been way cooler. It's a beast.
Founder, BMW Car Club de México
http://bmwclub.org.mx
'05 M3 E46 6SPD Mystic Blue
'08 M5 E60 SMG  Space Grey
'11 1M E82 6SPD Sapphire Black
'16 GT4 (1/3rd Share lol)
'18 M3 CS
'16 X5 5.0i (Wife)
'14 MINI Cooper Countryman S Automatic (For Sale)

sportyaccordy

Yep... sometimes the better car, ISN'T the better car.

I like the Viper more personally... everyone and their 56 year old bachelor Uncle Rico has a Vette. But I can't think of anywhere the Viper would be more fun to drive, esp when you throw the magnetic shocks in the mix. Its a relic surviving on ideological appeal, but since it appeals to my biases I am OK with it.

Cookie Monster

To me the 'Vette is the better looking and more desirable car of the two.
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

SVT666

Quote from: sportyaccordy on December 24, 2012, 10:16:10 PM
Yep... sometimes the better car, ISN'T the better car.

I like the Viper more personally... everyone and their 56 year old bachelor Uncle Rico has a Vette. But I can't think of anywhere the Viper would be more fun to drive, esp when you throw the magnetic shocks in the mix. Its a relic surviving on ideological appeal, but since it appeals to my biases I am OK with it.
Relic? It's an all new car.