The Official Sixth Gen Camaro Thread!

Started by Gotta-Qik-C7, January 19, 2015, 06:37:04 PM

Speed_Racer

I saw two 2016s w/ Michigan plates on the way to work this morning. I'm not a fan of the current Mustang's looks, the Camaro looks much much better in comparison.

And that's my $0.02

Gotta-Qik-C7

2014 C7 Vert, 2002 Silverado, 2005 Road Glide

GoCougs

Got my December 2015 C&D finally.

C&D's goofy ass girl-based rating system is ridiculous.

SJ_GTI

Quote from: GoCougs on November 09, 2015, 08:49:35 PM
Got my December 2015 C&D finally.

C&D's goofy ass girl-based rating system is ridiculous.

Does that mean they liked the Mustang better...?

12,000 RPM

No, the SS won handily. Article was pretty poorly written and too short though IMO. C&D in general has been a little meh the last few months
Protecctor of the Atmospheric Engine #TheyLiedToUs

MX793

Quote from: 12,000 RPM on November 10, 2015, 07:41:35 AM
No, the SS won handily. Article was pretty poorly written and too short though IMO. C&D in general has been a little meh the last few months

Few months?  C&D has been pretty meh for years.

Camaro won the performance categories handily.  Mustang won the non-performance categories (ergonomics, comfort, price, etc) pretty handily.  In the end they were only separated by 2 points.  Mustang was the better GT car, Camaro was the better "sports" car and their pick overall.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

FlatBlackCaddy

"Taking a couple fat girls to the dance"

"See the mustang and camaro go double chin to double chin in this months feature comparison!!!"

In next months issue we cover how to repair cracked asphalt after our pony car comparison."

GoCougs

Quote from: SJ_GTI on November 10, 2015, 06:13:48 AM
Does that mean they liked the Mustang better...?

No, that was just a general complaint - the rating system has always been goofy if not painful, esp. in the weighting for performance cars. C&D is just not very good these days, point system as well as writing.




Gotta-Qik-C7

Although it's still a better read than MT Ezra Dyer is the lone bright spot in C&D now a days.....
2014 C7 Vert, 2002 Silverado, 2005 Road Glide

CaminoRacer

Quote from: FlatBlackCaddy on November 10, 2015, 08:26:53 AM
"Taking a couple fat girls to the dance"

"See the mustang and camaro go double chin to double chin in this months feature comparison!!!"

In next months issue we cover how to repair cracked asphalt after our pony car comparison."

Best check this out.

http://www.motortrend.com/news/revelation-chevy-thats-better-bmw/?sm_id=social_aumomotortrendhub_MotorTrend_20151117_55373196&adbid=10153340324106312&adbpl=fb&adbpr=18332466311
2020 BMW 330i, 1969 El Camino, 2017 Bolt EV

Payman

2016 Motor trend Car of the Year winner.


Payman

Quote from: FlatBlackCaddy on November 18, 2015, 11:10:15 AM
Why what's this? A link to someone's opinion, how factual.

That's the 4th or 5th review I've read that praised the new Camaro.

CaminoRacer

Is it too soon for rental companies to have any of these?
2020 BMW 330i, 1969 El Camino, 2017 Bolt EV

GoCougs

Whoa, to say the Camaro cleaned up at M/T's Car of the Year award is an understatement in the extreme...



Cookie Monster

The fact that the Camaro still has such a little amount of glass makes me not take it seriously. Just look at that pic of the Camaro and BMW side profiles. Jesus.
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

CaminoRacer

Chopped tops have been cool for 60+ years.
2020 BMW 330i, 1969 El Camino, 2017 Bolt EV

FlatBlackCaddy

Quote from: GoCougs on November 18, 2015, 12:36:04 PM
lol, it's FBC. There's so much going on there it's hard to address - but in short, he can't help but hate the Camaro, he has to in fact.

Other than the way it looks, and it's curb weight, I really don't have any other issues with this car. You seem to think that I'm some sort of short sighted narrow visioned car fan(like yourself). Nothing could be further.

Payman

Quote from: FlatBlackCaddy on November 18, 2015, 02:13:30 PM
Other than the way it looks, and it's curb weight, I really don't have any other issues with this car. You seem to think that I'm some sort of short sighted narrow visioned car fan(like yourself). Nothing could be further.

Curb weight dropped 300+ pounds with the new platform... it's now lighter than the Mustang. That being said, driving my brother's 2010 SS made me hate the Camaro. I'm impressed with this new one, but I'd never buy one.

SVT666

Other than the styling and the lack of glass, it sounds like a helluva car.

GoCougs

Quote from: thecarnut on November 18, 2015, 01:19:49 PM
The fact that the Camaro still has such a little amount of glass makes me not take it seriously. Just look at that pic of the Camaro and BMW side profiles. Jesus.

So what exactly are you guys doing in your cars that this is such a problem?

FlatBlackCaddy

I hear the next gen camaro is just going to have a I pad mounted in front of the driver with a camera on the front of the car. No glass whatsoever.

Going to look sweeeeeet.

FlatBlackCaddy

Quote from: Rockraven on November 18, 2015, 03:34:27 PM
Curb weight dropped 300+ pounds with the new platform... it's now lighter than the Mustang. That being said, driving my brother's 2010 SS made me hate the Camaro. I'm impressed with this new one, but I'd never buy one.

I don't see a Curb weight listed on GM's site for the 2016, just TBD under that column on the spec sheet.

If it's over 3500 it's too much IMO. Ideally i'd prefer it around 3400(both the mustang and the camaro).

MX793

Quote from: GoCougs on November 18, 2015, 04:54:20 PM
So what exactly are you guys doing in your cars that this is such a problem?

Driving on roads with traffic lights mounted overhead.  Driving in parking lots with low-lying obstacles, like islands with curbs.  Even backing out of a parking space seems like it would require a small leap of faith since you can't see a damned thing out the back or out the rear quarters.  And autocross, where you have to negotiate a course around low-lying obstacles (traffic cones) without hitting them.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

FlatBlackCaddy

Quote from: MX793 on November 18, 2015, 05:10:08 PM
Driving on roads with traffic lights mounted overhead.  Driving in parking lots with low-lying obstacles, like islands with curbs.  Even backing out of a parking space seems like it would require a small leap of faith since you can't see a damned thing out the back or out the rear quarters.  And autocross, where you have to negotiate a course around low-lying obstacles (traffic cones) without hitting them.

Sounds perfectly reasonable, hence why GM fails to grasp such a concept.

FlatBlackCaddy

One thing that the camaro did do, was make it possible for someone, somewhere, who drives a lotus esprit to make the comment that visibility is "better than some newer cars".

Who'd have ever thought.

Payman

The 2010 Camaro is the worst car I've eve driven for visibility. It's not even something you're aware of in most cars, but you do notice right away in this car. I imagine the new one is no better.

FlatBlackCaddy

Quote from: Rockraven on November 18, 2015, 05:16:47 PM
The 2010 Camaro is the worst car I've eve driven for visibility. It's not even something you're aware of in most cars, but you do notice right away in this car. I imagine the new one is no better.

Just shutup and spend 40K on a car that you can't see out of.

God damn anti GM trolls. What the hell do you want, visibility. It's a god damn car, why do you need to see where you are going. Absolutely ridiculous, damn kids.

68_427

Quote from: FlatBlackCaddy on November 18, 2015, 05:09:31 PM
I don't see a Curb weight listed on GM's site for the 2016, just TBD under that column on the spec sheet.

If it's over 3500 it's too much IMO. Ideally i'd prefer it around 3400(both the mustang and the camaro).

The V6 is 3400lbs
Quotewhere were you when automotive dream died
i was sat at home drinking brake fluid when wife ring
'racecar is die'
no