OK, so the NSX is actually here. How is it?

Started by 12,000 RPM, October 27, 2015, 11:38:13 AM

12,000 RPM

Apparently, not good.

http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/first-drives/reviews/a27144/2017-acura-nsx-first-drive/

QuoteStumbling out of San Francisco and into the varicose pavement along the coast, I expect the NSX to come alive, to shine like the new penny wonder its ancestor was.

It doesn't happen.

Too late now, but IMO it would have been a better idea to have kept it under ~3000lbs, scrap the turbos and front hybrid motors and made it a ~400HP feedback machine. Honda claims it wasn't chasing performance figures or w/e but it sure dues seem like they gave up a lot to meet them. O well
Protecctor of the Atmospheric Engine #TheyLiedToUs

Submariner

2010 G-550  //  2019 GLS-550


2o6

I read two glowing reviews, so I'm going to need you to post more than that little snippit that only supports your view of this car.



Secondly, having gotten a little seat time with the old NSX, the beauty of that car is how livable it is. It drives a lot like a big low EK Civic.

giant_mtb


Payman

Road and Track is disappoint:

http://kinja.roadandtrack.com/first-drive-was-the-2017-acura-nsx-worth-the-wait-1738939200

$170,000 overwrought and overweight turd. Looks like they did a CRZ on a bigger scale. There's much to be said for "keep it simple, stupid".

Cookie Monster

If you read till the end, you'd see they said with the appropriate Michelin PSS's in Track mode it's actually decent. With the shitty all season Continentals and in Sport/Sport+ mode it sucks.

Still though, I agree. 3,800 lb is a crap ton and IMO they've diluted the NSX name by releasing this thing which is in no way similar at all to the original.
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

12,000 RPM

Sorry, yea, link added in first post.

Over 3800lbs for a 2 seat midengine car. Honda just said "fuck it... we promised and got this far, just extrude this turd".

On the upside, there are rumors of a car below this that will pretty much be as I described, for like half the price or less. Still MR, but with a 1.5 turbo 4 hybrid instead. Will be <3100lbs (so 3,092). I still think they should just throw cams in the old Accord V6 IMA and go from there but who am I.

Manufacturers are going too far. Cars like the Cayman are in the sweet spot IMO. Who would buy that NSX over something like a GT4 or GT3 for less $$$? I don't get it.
Protecctor of the Atmospheric Engine #TheyLiedToUs

MX793

C&D said that it was technically pretty good, particularly with the better tires, but ultimately not as engaging, dramatic, or special feeling as its predecessor.  Car had no soul.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

FlatBlackCaddy

3800lbs?!@!?!?!?!!

Sweet f'in christ that is ridiculous.

Thank god mazda might drop a new rx car, atleast someone(mazda) still knows that some of us like lighter cars.

GoCougs

So, basically a Kmart hyper exotic (918, LaFerrari, P1). With the all the pseudo science and gaming of regulation flying about one can't really blame 'em but they all suck still the same. Junk.

Acura had an opportunity to rebrand itself and totally blew it. A real shame.

Eye of the Tiger

Quote from: Rockraven on October 27, 2015, 11:48:10 AM
Road and Track is disappoint:

http://kinja.roadandtrack.com/first-drive-was-the-2017-acura-nsx-worth-the-wait-1738939200

$170,000 overwrought and overweight turd. Looks like they did a CRZ on a bigger scale. There's much to be said for "keep it simple, stupid".

Sounds like a tire problem
2008 TUNDRA (Truck Ultra-wideband Never-say-die Daddy Rottweiler Awesome)

FlatBlackCaddy


Gotta-Qik-C7

Has Honda gotten ANYTHING right since the S2000?
2014 C7 Vert, 2002 Silverado, 2005 Road Glide

Laconian

It sounds like a tire upgrade makes it a much, much better drive? If that's true, then yeah - Honda's dumb for speccing the OEM tires, but if just a couple grand worth of tires makes the car awesome, why this gloomy writeup? :huh:

Never underestimate the importance in choosing proper footwear. The hero Michelins transform the NSX from a vague, confidence sapping experience into a car that encourages you to push a little harder, to gun for the next apex and dive deep. There's turn in where there was no turn in before. Grip. Glorious, glorious grip. The right rubber lets you use this miracle machine Honda stitched together, and you can feel a quiet thread of commonality singing back to that special car, the first NSX.

In Track Mode and shod with the sticky Michelins, the NSX wakes up. The hellish understeer nearly vanishes. It's not a neutral car by any means, but it's easier to point in the direction you want. The rest is managed with big lifts of the throttle or brakes. The tail rotates and sets beautifully. It's so good, you wonder why the engineers buried it under a nasty pile of algorithms and unfortunate tire.
Kia EV6 GT-Line / MX-5 RF 6MT

CALL_911

I haven't read anything about it, but in the messiah I trust:

https://goo.gl/DOIjWh


2004 S2000
2016 340xi

Eye of the Tiger

2008 TUNDRA (Truck Ultra-wideband Never-say-die Daddy Rottweiler Awesome)

Laconian

Quote from: CALL_911 on October 27, 2015, 02:49:14 PM
I haven't read anything about it, but in the messiah I trust:

https://goo.gl/DOIjWh

+1 to what he said, negative press gets the clicks. People love to hate.
Kia EV6 GT-Line / MX-5 RF 6MT

ifcar

Quote from: Laconian on October 27, 2015, 04:01:23 PM
+1 to what he said, negative press gets the clicks. People love to hate.

I feel like there wouldn't be a consensus forming around a hot new car if there weren't some truth behind it. Usually it takes a comparison test for a supercar to get hit with criticism.

But maybe it's the years of delays that used up the positive "hey, look at this cool thing!" articles.

Gotta-Qik-C7

2014 C7 Vert, 2002 Silverado, 2005 Road Glide

Eye of the Tiger

2008 TUNDRA (Truck Ultra-wideband Never-say-die Daddy Rottweiler Awesome)

Gotta-Qik-C7

2014 C7 Vert, 2002 Silverado, 2005 Road Glide

CaminoRacer

That dude bought half the cars that were auctioned off. Must have been one of the lottery winners...
2020 BMW 330i, 1969 El Camino, 2017 Bolt EV

SVT666

The buyer was Rick Hendrick of Hendrick Motorsports and the Hendrick Automotive Group.

Payman

$50,000 in options??? I can't even afford the options on this thing.

FlatBlackCaddy

Quote from: Laconian on October 27, 2015, 04:01:23 PM
+1 to what he said, negative press gets the clicks. People love to hate.

Pretty tough to spin 3800lbs into a positive.

You cant change physics.

FlatBlackCaddy

Quote from: SVT666 on February 01, 2016, 04:14:09 PM
The buyer was Rick Hendrick of Hendrick Motorsports and the Hendrick Automotive Group.

Should have left that scarf at home.

12,000 RPM

Chris Harris had a review where it sounded like he was trying to convince himself that it was good

IDK man.

They lost the plot.
Protecctor of the Atmospheric Engine #TheyLiedToUs

2o6

I think you guys are insane and sound hyperbolic as fuck, as usual.




SVT666

Quote from: 2o6 on February 02, 2016, 06:35:38 AM
I think you guys are insane and sound hyperbolic as fuck, as usual.
Everything I have seen says the car isn't very fun.