Mazda CX-9

Started by 2o6, December 06, 2015, 04:16:02 PM

2o6

I'm super surprised this was never posted here.


Gorgeous, if a bit expected.



Interior looks absolutely tremendous. Only real complaint is that the shifter seems really close to the HVAC dials.






Power comes from a 2.5T

http://www.autoblog.com/2015/11/18/2017-mazda-cx9-official/

GoCougs

Looks terrible, terrible motor.

2o6


GoCougs

It looks like a big 3, which is a terrible looking car what with that protuberance front end. Current CX-9 looks a million times better:


MX793

Looks light years better than the latest Honda Pilot.  I've noticed several out on the streets and they are awkward looking.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

MrH


Quote from: MX793 on December 06, 2015, 05:09:56 PM
Looks light years better than the latest Honda Pilot.  I've noticed several out on the streets and they are awkward looking.

Agreed. Just looks like a big minivan bubble on stilts.
2023 Ford Lightning Lariat ER
2019 Acura RDX SH-AWD
2023 BRZ Limited

Previous: '02 Mazda Protege5, '08 Mazda Miata, '05 Toyota Tacoma, '09 Honda Element, '13 Subaru BRZ, '14 Hyundai Genesis R-Spec 5.0, '15 Toyota 4Runner SR5, '18 Honda Accord EX-L 2.0t, '01 Honda S2000, '20 Subaru Outback XT, '23 Chevy Bolt EUV

2o6

Quote from: MrH on December 06, 2015, 05:26:54 PM
Agreed. Just looks like a big minivan bubble on stilts.


Loads of room, tho

SVT666

Not crazy about the styling, but that interior looks amazing.

68_427

Quotewhere were you when automotive dream died
i was sat at home drinking brake fluid when wife ring
'racecar is die'
no


ifcar

It looks nice and promising. And Mazda seems like the sort of automaker that would learn from its previous disaster with a turbocharged crossover.

Quote from: 2o6 on December 06, 2015, 04:16:02 PM

Interior looks absolutely tremendous. Only real complaint is that the shifter seems really close to the HVAC dials.




It should be fine when the car is in Drive. It's pretty common for them to be obscured in Park.

For instance:



Vs.



Cookie Monster

I love Mazda but this looks awkward inside and out. The rear looks nice, but the headlights are too small and the grille is way too big. The HVAC vents and controls look really low on the dash, and then you have a ton of empty room before you get to the stuck on screen (which I hate in the 3 and Miata as well).
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

TBR

Interior looks great, but unsure how practical it is.

Love the exterior.

68_427

Quote from: thecarnut on December 07, 2015, 08:25:21 AM
I love Mazda but this looks awkward inside and out. The rear looks nice, but the headlights are too small and the grille is way too big. The HVAC vents and controls look really low on the dash, and then you have a ton of empty room before you get to the stuck on screen (which I hate in the 3 and Miata as well).

Will look much different from the driver's seat.
Quotewhere were you when automotive dream died
i was sat at home drinking brake fluid when wife ring
'racecar is die'
no


Morris Minor

I like it - but not convinced that the little 4-banger won't be overworked lugging it around.
⏤  '10 G37 | '21 CX-5 GT Reserve  ⏤
''Simplicity is Complexity Resolved'' - Constantin Brâncuși

2o6

Quote from: Morris Minor on December 08, 2015, 08:17:08 AM
I like it - but not convinced that the little 4-banger won't be overworked lugging it around.


Explorer gets around just fine


Also, the 3.6L in the GM crossovers are strangely Japanese in their power delivery; it's all up top

Raza

You're right, the looks are expected, but good.  I like it.  Can't ever see a reason for me to have one, way too big.  CX-5 would already be more than enough for me. 

Although, I'll have to say it looks very sophisticated and upscale, inside and out, for a car that will cost around $30,000.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

Morris Minor

I do see what Cougs means though, the proboscis on Mazdas is a bit ungainly.  Isn't it some European regulation to stem the epidemic mass slaughter of pedestrians too stupid to get out of the way?   
⏤  '10 G37 | '21 CX-5 GT Reserve  ⏤
''Simplicity is Complexity Resolved'' - Constantin Brâncuși

2o6

No, it's just not packaged well.