MotoGP vs F1 acceleration

Started by 12,000 RPM, January 16, 2016, 08:33:26 PM

12,000 RPM

Protecctor of the Atmospheric Engine #TheyLiedToUs

Eye of the Tiger

So, which guy has the biggest nutsack?
2008 TUNDRA (Truck Ultra-wideband Never-say-die Daddy Rottweiler Awesome)

MX793

My guess is that the downforce of the F1 car, and associated induced drag, is what really kills it at higher speeds.
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5

GoCougs

Kinda interesting. The F1 car (at least the V10 cars, when I last paid attention) had a notably better power/weight ratio (~1.4 lb/hp vs. ~1.7 lb/hp) so if the F1 car had the aero sophistication of the MotoGP bike (which is to say, not much) yet given it has to punch a bigger hole through the air and has more friction with the ground, they'd probably be about the same, with maybe a bit of an advantage to the bike. However, race the two against each other and the F1 car will be tens of seconds ahead per lap and would lap a MotoGP bike many times - a dozen or more over the length of the average F1 race of ~70+ laps.

Payman

Quote from: MX793 on January 16, 2016, 09:42:36 PM
My guess is that the downforce of the F1 car, and associated induced drag, is what really kills it at higher speeds.

Absolutely, the drag induced by the aerodynamics at speed is massive. Put a "speedway kit" on the F1 car, and the result would be much different.