Z06 vs GT500KR Edmunds

Started by 565, September 04, 2008, 02:23:45 PM

565

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=131034


No surprise really.

Interesting tidbit thrown in about the GT-R at the end.  Edmunds mentioned their own long term GT-R in preformance testing, so there is probably another upcoming comparo involving the Z06 and GT-R.

SVT666

I'm posting this before I even read it.

Mismatch.  Cars that don't compete and are in totally different classes.  Why even compare them?

Now I'm going to go read it.

SVT666

Read it.  I still stand by what I said.  Stupid comparo.

Having said that, it sounds like testers are starting to fall out of love with the Z06.  When it first came out, it was the greatest car ever made, now everyone is saying how bad the handling is. 

Soup DeVille

Quote from: HEMI666 on September 04, 2008, 03:22:19 PM
Read it.  I still stand by what I said.  Stupid comparo.

Having said that, it sounds like testers are starting to fall out of love with the Z06.  When it first came out, it was the greatest car ever made, now everyone is saying how bad the handling is. 

Reviewers often bargain for an early review- The magazines want good sales from getting the first drive in a hot new car, and the manufacturers want good press; and any of these magazines know that if they repay the early access to the car granted them by the automaker with anything but a breathlessly glowing review, they can kiss any chance of ever being shown that sort of consideration again goodbye.

After the car is actually in showrooms and available to the general public, the reviewers have more of a chance to say what they really think.
Maybe we need to start off small. I mean, they don't let you fuck the glumpers at Glumpees without a level 4 FuckPass, do they?

1975 Honda CB750, 1986 Rebel Rascal (sailing dinghy), 2015 Mini Cooper, 2020 Winnebago 31H (E450), 2021 Toyota 4Runner, 2022 Lincoln Aviator

Rich

Every review I've read from day 1 has mentioned the squirrely rear end
2003 Mazda Miata 5MT; 2005 Subaru Impreza Outback Sport 4AT

SVT666

Quote from: HotRodPilot on September 04, 2008, 04:13:50 PM
Every review I've read from day 1 has mentioned the squirrely rear end
Yes, but every time I read a comparo with a Z06 in it, the reviews are getting more and more critical all the time of the handling.  This one is down right damning.

565

Quote from: HEMI666 on September 04, 2008, 04:23:18 PM
Yes, but every time I read a comparo with a Z06 in it, the reviews are getting more and more critical all the time of the handling.  This one is down right damning.

The field has moved on.  When the Z06 first came out, it was one of the fastest cars available around the track.  So they somewhat overlooked the vague rear end.

In these short few years, quite a few cars have been just as amazing or more amazing around the track, R8, Viper ACR, 911 GT3/GT2, and of course the GT-R

The Edmunds crew has a GT-R in it's stable now, so I guess it's inevitable they are making some comparisons in confidence, and basically few cars can match the GT-R's handling confidence.  They couldn't resist mentioning it at the end.

Raza

Quote from: HEMI666 on September 04, 2008, 04:23:18 PM
Yes, but every time I read a comparo with a Z06 in it, the reviews are getting more and more critical all the time of the handling.  This one is down right damning.

It's still the most fun car in GT5.  And I'm faster in it than I am in my 430. 

Still it's customary.  Every car is wonderful when it comes out, then is terrible when it's replaced or a higher performance model comes out (i.e., the ZR-1) and then in fifteen years it's wonderful again (provided it's a BMW).
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

SVT666

Quote from: Raza  link=topic=15729.msg873265#msg873265 date=1220569292
It's still the most fun car in GT5.  And I'm faster in it than I am in my 430. 

Still it's customary.  Every car is wonderful when it comes out, then is terrible when it's replaced or a higher performance model comes out (i.e., the ZR-1) and then in fifteen years it's wonderful again (provided it's a BMW).
That's not entirely true.  I haven't read a positive review about the Mustang...ever.   :lol: 

The initial reviews praised Ford for what they did with a live axle rearend, but I don't remember any review ever stating it's handling was top notch or anything.

Raza

Quote from: HEMI666 on September 04, 2008, 05:03:45 PM
That's not entirely true.  I haven't read a positive review about the Mustang...ever.   :lol: 

The initial reviews praised Ford for what they did with a live axle rearend, but I don't remember any review ever stating it's handling was top notch or anything.

Right, but when the new Mustang came out, the magazines were all over it, creaming about how cool it was (Gotta Have It factor was through the roof!) and how well it handled for having a live axle.  When, if ever, an IRS Mustang comes out, they'll all shit on the current car, then in ten years talk about it as being the last real Mustang.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

Cookie Monster

Damn, the Ford is such a ripoff!

Why would anyone take that over a Viper ACR?
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

SVT666

Quote from: thecarnut on September 04, 2008, 05:14:36 PM
Damn, the Ford is such a ripoff!

Why would anyone take that over a Viper ACR?
It's a different kind of car and can be lived with daily.  It's definitely a ripoff, but everything with Shelby's name on it is.

Raza

Quote from: HEMI666 on September 04, 2008, 05:18:44 PM
It's a different kind of car and can be lived with daily.  It's definitely a ripoff, but everything with Shelby's name on it is.

I don't know about that.  If the GT500 sold at sticker, it would be a very good deal.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

Soup DeVille

Quote from: HEMI666 on September 04, 2008, 05:18:44 PM
It's a different kind of car and can be lived with daily.  It's definitely a ripoff, but everything with Shelby's name on it is.

Omni GLHS.
Maybe we need to start off small. I mean, they don't let you fuck the glumpers at Glumpees without a level 4 FuckPass, do they?

1975 Honda CB750, 1986 Rebel Rascal (sailing dinghy), 2015 Mini Cooper, 2020 Winnebago 31H (E450), 2021 Toyota 4Runner, 2022 Lincoln Aviator

565

Quote from: Raza  on September 04, 2008, 05:22:12 PM
I don't know about that.  If the GT500 sold at sticker, it would be a very good deal.

I bet Ford saw how much the GT500's were being marked up and thought, hey why are we letting the dealers rip off those suckers when we can rip them off directly instead?

SVT666

Quote from: Raza  link=topic=15729.msg873276#msg873276 date=1220570532
I don't know about that.  If the GT500 sold at sticker, it would be a very good deal.
Okay, yes you are right.  But I'm thinking of the exorbitant markups dealers are putting on them.  Personally, for the same price as the GT500KR and I still wanted a Mustang, I would rather buy the Shelby Super Snake.  Same price, but has 725 hp.

Raza

Quote from: 565 on September 04, 2008, 05:36:52 PM
I bet Ford saw how much the GT500's were being marked up and thought, hey why are we letting the dealers rip off those suckers when we can rip them off directly instead?

I saw a GT500 for sale, and I checked the "Market Adjustment"; $25,000.  I literally laughed out loud, like a maniac, and walked out.  I didn't want to do business with those people
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

sportyaccordy

Why not just put a supercharger on a regular GT & save urself the $$$ and ###'s

Raza

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

SVT666

Quote from: Raza  link=topic=15729.msg873633#msg873633 date=1220629115
Warranty, exclusivity, et al.
Ford Racing sells a supercharger kit that takes the GT to 485 hp and leaves the warranty intact. 

SVT666

Quote from: sportyaccordy on September 05, 2008, 09:34:11 AM
Why not just put a supercharger on a regular GT & save urself the $$$ and ###'s
Mustang GT = $28,000
Supercharger Kit and Installation = $8000
Suspension and Installation = $4000
Brake Kit and Installation = $4000
Wheel and Tire Combo = $2500
New shifter and clutch and Installation = $1100
Exhaust system and installation = $2500
Dyno Tune = $500

Total = $46,600

Your warranty is all but gone, resale value is in the toilet, and you just spent more then the MSRP of a GT500.



Nethead

#21
Quote from: Raza  on September 04, 2008, 05:14:16 PM
Right, but when the new Mustang came out, the magazines were all over it, creaming about how cool it was (Gotta Have It factor was through the roof!) and how well it handled for having a live axle.  When, if ever, an IRS Mustang comes out, they'll all shit on the current car, then in ten years talk about it as being the last real Mustang.

Raza:  RazDude has become the leading sage of the World Wide Web with this posting. :ohyeah:  My hat is off to the Raz! :cheers:  That is such the essence of just exactly how it will be!  GGGRRREEEAAATTT work, RazDude! :clap:
So many stairs...so little time...

Soup DeVille

Quote from: HEMI666 on September 05, 2008, 10:27:02 AM
Mustang GT = $28,000
Supercharger Kit and Installation = $8000
Suspension and Installation = $4000
Brake Kit and Installation = $4000
Wheel and Tire Combo = $2500
New shifter and clutch and Installation = $1100
Exhaust system and installation = $2500
Dyno Tune = $500

Total = $46,600

Your warranty is all but gone, resale value is in the toilet, and you just spent more then the MSRP of a GT500.




$2500 for an exhaust?
Any supercharger kit costing $8000 better have a tune already for it.
You can get any number of high quality suspension upgrades for way less than $4000.

But anyways, even if you did outspend the MSRP of a 500KR, whoc cares; you're not going to find one at MSRP anyways, and in the end, you'll have a much more personal and unique vehicle.

Not saying that its the only option, or that it is a better one for everybody, but it is an option.
Maybe we need to start off small. I mean, they don't let you fuck the glumpers at Glumpees without a level 4 FuckPass, do they?

1975 Honda CB750, 1986 Rebel Rascal (sailing dinghy), 2015 Mini Cooper, 2020 Winnebago 31H (E450), 2021 Toyota 4Runner, 2022 Lincoln Aviator

SVT666

Quote from: Soup DeVille on September 05, 2008, 05:32:29 PM
$2500 for an exhaust?
Headers, mid-pipe, and catback including installation.  Yes.

QuoteAny supercharger kit costing $8000 better have a tune already for it.
That is supercharger and installation.  Most shops charge as much for the installation and setup as the kit costs.  $8000 might be a bit high, but it won't be below $6000.

QuoteYou can get any number of high quality suspension upgrades for way less than $4000.
Shocks, struts, springs, roll bars, strut tower brace, etc plus installation.  Yes.

QuoteBut anyways, even if you did outspend the MSRP of a 500KR, whoc cares; you're not going to find one at MSRP anyways, and in the end, you'll have a much more personal and unique vehicle.

Not saying that its the only option, or that it is a better one for everybody, but it is an option.
It is an option, and it's an option I would probably go for myself, but he asked why would someone buy a GT500 when they could just supercharge a GT and save money.  That was my answer.  It's more then just a supercharger.

GoCougs

Quote from: Soup DeVille on September 05, 2008, 05:32:29 PM
$2500 for an exhaust?

Sounds way excessive to me, too, considering most exhaust systems today are bolt on.

omicron

What an awful article. I don't necessarily agree that the two cars are not competitors, but in general it reads like a specification sheet with joining words, and a deliberate avoidance of sentences longer than five words of no more than five letters each.

I would now like to disappear in search of '68 GT500KRs and chrome-bumper C3 Corvettes.

SVT666

Quote from: GoCougs on September 06, 2008, 12:14:07 AM
Sounds way excessive to me, too, considering most exhaust systems today are bolt on.

Did you read what I posted?  That is headers, mid-pipe, and catback including installation.  Header installation on a Mustang requires pulling the engine.  The reason I included installation is because 95% of owners don't do their own work.

sandertheshark

Quote from: HEMI666 on September 04, 2008, 03:22:19 PM
Read it.  I still stand by what I said.  Stupid comparo.

Having said that, it sounds like testers are starting to fall out of love with the Z06.  When it first came out, it was the greatest car ever made, now everyone is saying how bad the handling is. 

Its called cognitive dissonance.  A common affliction among journalists.

GoCougs

Quote from: HEMI666 on September 06, 2008, 10:03:43 AM
Did you read what I posted?  That is headers, mid-pipe, and catback including installation.  Header installation on a Mustang requires pulling the engine.  The reason I included installation is because 95% of owners don't do their own work.

Requires pulling the engine? I don't think so.

MX793

Quote from: HEMI666 on September 05, 2008, 10:17:29 AM
Ford Racing sells a supercharger kit that takes the GT to 485 hp and leaves the warranty intact. 

You should read the Ford Racing warranty statements.  The warranty on Ford Racing supercharger does NOT leave your vehicle warranty intact.  Your existing manufacturer's warranty is replaced by a 1 year, 12K mile warranty starting from the date of installation (provided the parts are installed by a Ford dealer within the first 3 years, 36K miles).  So if you rush to install these parts on your car within the first year of ownership, you've just cut your warranty short (by quite a bit since I believe Ford's powertrain warranty is now 5 years).
Needs more Jiggawatts

2016 Ford Mustang GTPP / 2011 Toyota Rav4 Base AWD / 2014 Kawasaki Ninja 1000 ABS
1992 Nissan 240SX Fastback / 2004 Mazda Mazda3s / 2011 Ford Mustang V6 Premium / 2007 Suzuki GSF1250SA Bandit / 2006 VW Jetta 2.5