Info and pics: New R32

Started by ifcar, August 09, 2005, 09:05:39 AM

ifcar

It was the most powerful Golf ever. The Golf R32 powered by a 177 kW (241 bhp) engine was first launched in August 2002. Not only was it one of the hottest cars on the road, it also sold like hot cakes: three times as many R32's were sold than originally planned. These are excellent prospects for its successor.

Now comes a new R32 based on the Golf V generation. This time it packs 184 kW (250 bhp) under the bonnet; the permanent 4MOTION four-wheel drive again promises excellent roadholding. The new model will see its world premiere at the 59th Frankfurt Motor Show (15 to 25 September). Market launch will be at the end of September. Prices for the new Golf R32 start at ?32,200.

From the outside, the best Golf ever is not only recognisable by the R32 logo. Similar to its predecessor, the new top Golf has a design and equipment all of its own. The Golf R32 has a top speed of 250 km/h and comes either with a 6-speed manual gearbox or the optional dual clutch gearbox (DSG). Equipped with the DSG the 'R32' is even faster: 6.2 instead 6.5 seconds from 0-100 km/h. Despite all this, the model is unusually easy to handle.

From the front, the new R32 generation is immediately recognisable by its unique aluminium-effect shield-shaped radiator grille. At the top of the grille are double aluminium cross struts. Under the number plate there is another central air scoop for the powerful 3.2-litre V6 engine. Two more large openings on each side of the shield-shaped radiator grille are intended for fresh air supply. As opposed to all other Golfs, there are air ducts at the bottom and on either side of the fully painted front bumper. The lines of the air duct continue into the side skirt all the way along to the rear bumper.

The rear of the Golf R32 is also designed as a fully painted bumper. Only the middle section in the shape of a diffuser is in black. The two round tailpipes made of polished stainless steel are placed centrally next to each other and are integrated prominently in the rear bumper. A glance at the outline of the Golf R32 shows the 18-inch light-alloy wheels (type 'Zolder?). They are fitted with 20 spokes and continue the design theme of the first R32 wheel. The spokes still allow glimpses of what lies behind them: brake calipers painted blue. They come with 345 mm (diameter) discs at the front and 310 mm at the rear.

The 225/40 tyres bear the Y-pattern tread for high-speed tyres up to 300 km/h. A large-size rear spoiler makes sure that the rear wheels stay firmly on the road. The fact that the wheel-tyre combination sits snugly in the wheel housings is partly due to the 18-inch wheel size but also to the specially tuned sports running gear that is lower by 20 millimetres.

The sporty concept of the Golf R32 is a theme that permeates the entire vehicle. Take the interior, for example. There are distinctive instruments, sports seats, pedals in aluminium look and special applications that emphasise the sporty nature of the Golf. The sports steering wheel, with perforated leather along the grip area, and the R32 gear shift knob lie firmly in the hand.

As opposed to the more purist style of the Golf GTI, the R32 top model boasts a dazzling array of standard equipment at no extra price, such as automatic air conditioning (Climatronic), the RCD 300 audio system with ten loudspeakers, anti-theft alarm system plus, multifunction display, automatic anti-dazzle interior mirror, rain sensor, tyre pressure monitor and the complete safety programme comprising six airbags, ESP and brake assistant. The standard bi-xenon headlights light up the night like day.

No other car in this segment offers so many different engines. With the introduction of the Golf R32 the model range now stretches from 55 kW (75 bhp) to 184 kW (250 bhp). Including the R32-V6, there are ten engines on offer ? six petrol and four diesel. This year two more interesting engines will be added to the Golf range. The Golf remains an exciting car to watch.











giant_mtb

I'm lovin' the 4-door, but the 2-door hatch looks too...well...cute.  :lol:  

TBR

I like it, but I wish they had figured out a way to get the new 3.6l in there.

R33 GT-R

The 4 door looks sweet.  At 250 hp you can bet it will roll too.
Dubbed:  Skanky Whore!

                           

BMWDave

The seats look great B)

But somehow, it has lost the hardedginess, if you will, of the previous R32.  It doesnt look as mean.  

2007 Honda S2000
OEM Hardtop, Rick's Ti Shift Knob, 17" Volk LE37ts coming soon...

Raza

The current one looks much better.  The upturn at the backend of the 3 door gives it too much of a bubbly, cutesy look.  Kind of makes it look like a Focus.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

850CSi


giant_mtb



Last-gen R32 spotted in York, England.  :praise:  

Raza

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

giant_mtb

Thanks...my bro took it. ^_^

SJ_GTI

Looks, and sounds, good. I actually think the 5-door is better looking as well. I was thinking about that as I scrolled through the pictures and then you guys saying it really says I am not imagining things.

I think the A3 will get the same engine/awd combo, yeah?

Raza

QuoteLooks, and sounds, good. I actually think the 5-door is better looking as well. I was thinking about that as I scrolled through the pictures and then you guys saying it really says I am not imagining things.

I think the A3 will get the same engine/awd combo, yeah?
If so, I hope soon.  Then I'd know what car to buy.  If I lived in England now, I'd buy an Audi A3 3.2 Quattro Sportback (3 door) 6 speed for roughly 25K pounds.  They need to sell that here, with the manual and AWD intact.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

Raza

QuoteLooks, and sounds, good. I actually think the 5-door is better looking as well. I was thinking about that as I scrolled through the pictures and then you guys saying it really says I am not imagining things.

I think the A3 will get the same engine/awd combo, yeah?
If so, I hope soon.  Then I'd know what car to buy.  If I lived in England now, I'd buy an Audi A3 3.2 Quattro Sportback (3 door) 6 speed for roughly 25K pounds.  They need to sell that here, with the manual and AWD intact.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

SJ_GTI

Meh...almost doesn't seem worth it. Not that i think this is a bad car, but I would be more likely to get the 2.0T GTI once it hits our shores than this. The small turbo engine suits the personality better I think.

Just my own opinion though.

FlatBlackCaddy

I agree with raza, this new R32 doesn't look as hot as the current gen.

Personally for the kinda of cash they want i'd pick up a Mazdaspeed 3 or 6, both are probobly cheaper.

SJ_GTI

Is there a Mazdaspeed3?

I don't like the Mazdaspeed 6. It just looked weird when i saw it at the auto show. Actually this may seem weird but they had some souped up Galant and i thought that looked really good, so maybe my taste isn't normal.  :P  

BMWDave

QuoteIs there a Mazdaspeed3?

I don't like the Mazdaspeed 6. It just looked weird when i saw it at the auto show. Actually this may seem weird but they had some souped up Galant and i thought that looked really good, so maybe my taste isn't normal.  :P
Its being tested at the moment.

2007 Honda S2000
OEM Hardtop, Rick's Ti Shift Knob, 17" Volk LE37ts coming soon...

Run Away

A) I'm stealing those seats

B) WHY did they fuck up the styling? :(

Raghavan

Anyone know the torque split of the 4wd?

FlatBlackCaddy

4 motion is the FWD based system(i believe, i'm not too up on VW tech). Anyway i believe its max split is 50/50, with more power going to the front when not at 50/50.

Run Away

I wonder if someone were to hack into the 4motion code, would they be able to lock it inot 50/50?

Raghavan

Quote4 motion is the FWD based system(i believe, i'm not too up on VW tech). Anyway i believe its max split is 50/50, with more power going to the front when not at 50/50.
It uses a Torsen diff, right? Is the Phaetons' the same kind of 4 motion?

SJ_GTI

Quote
Quote4 motion is the FWD based system(i believe, i'm not too up on VW tech). Anyway i believe its max split is 50/50, with more power going to the front when not at 50/50.
It uses a Torsen diff, right? Is the Phaetons' the same kind of 4 motion?
My car uses a torsen differential, the Golf (and its variants) all use a haldex type differential.

Its been a while since I read about the technical differences, but in theory you can get a haldex system to be RWD biased. Look at the X-Type and the nee Alfa 159. I think the main difference is that a torsen differential is mainly a mechanical setup vs the haldex being a largely computer controlled setup.

Raghavan

Quote
Quote
Quote4 motion is the FWD based system(i believe, i'm not too up on VW tech). Anyway i believe its max split is 50/50, with more power going to the front when not at 50/50.
It uses a Torsen diff, right? Is the Phaetons' the same kind of 4 motion?
My car uses a torsen differential, the Golf (and its variants) all use a haldex type differential.

Its been a while since I read about the technical differences, but in theory you can get a haldex system to be RWD biased. Look at the X-Type and the nee Alfa 159. I think the main difference is that a torsen differential is mainly a mechanical setup vs the haldex being a largely computer controlled setup.
ah. so the new R32 is still FWD biased? :(  

Raza

QuoteMeh...almost doesn't seem worth it. Not that i think this is a bad car, but I would be more likely to get the 2.0T GTI once it hits our shores than this. The small turbo engine suits the personality better I think.

Just my own opinion though.
I'm pretty much done with VWAG unless they stick a stick in the A4 3.2.  They no longer sell vehicles that suit my needs.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

Raza

QuoteAnyone know the torque split of the 4wd?
It's the same system used in the TT, a Haldex system with a front wheel bias.  
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

Raghavan

FWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.

Raza

QuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
On a car that small it's not a big deal.  You can get the back end of a TT out.  I've done it myself.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
If you can read this, you're too close


2006 BMW Z4 3.0i
http://accelerationtherapy.squarespace.com/   @accelerationdoc
Quote from: the Teuton on October 05, 2009, 03:53:18 PMIt's impossible to argue with Raza. He wins. Period. End of discussion.

SJ_GTI

Quote
QuoteMeh...almost doesn't seem worth it. Not that i think this is a bad car, but I would be more likely to get the 2.0T GTI once it hits our shores than this. The small turbo engine suits the personality better I think.

Just my own opinion though.
I'm pretty much done with VWAG unless they stick a stick in the A4 3.2.  They no longer sell vehicles that suit my needs.
What's wrong with the A4 2.0T?

Or the S4 6MT?

:P

The no 6MT on the 3.2 is silly IMHO. I don't understand why they don't offer one in the US.

SJ_GTI

QuoteFWD biased 4WD sucks. just as bad as FWD, and extra weight too.
Explain that to EVO drivers.  :praise: