Rapide caught nude

Started by 2o6, June 20, 2009, 10:00:39 PM

2o6

Spied Naked. Aston's design language is looking a bit tired, but I still like it. It looks great.

http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/Secret-new-cars/Search-Results/Your-spyshots/Aston-Martin-Rapide-reader-spy-shots/

Copyrighted pics.

Cookie Monster

It looks like every other Aston on sale right now.
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

sportyaccordy

Quote from: thecarnut on June 20, 2009, 10:02:22 PM
It looks like every other Aston on sale right now.
Yea pretty much. They need to Jag it up

ChrisV

Quote from: thecarnut on June 20, 2009, 10:02:22 PM
It looks like every other Aston on sale right now.

Techncially it's a 4 door DB9, so yeah, looking the same was the entire point.

And it matters so much because Aston makes so many cars?
Like a fine Detroit wine, this vehicle has aged to budgetary perfection...

sandertheshark

Need some different wheels, but otherwise, :wub:

It's a good thing I can't afford to choose between this and the Maserati Quattroporte.

TBR

Quote from: ChrisV on June 21, 2009, 09:13:22 AM
Techncially it's a 4 door DB9, so yeah, looking the same was the entire point.

And it matters so much because Aston makes so many cars?

The DB9 has been out for ~5 years and was based on a design language established in the mid-90s itself.

I think it looks fabulous, but Aston needs to make a change with their styling or I am afraid they will find themselves in the same boat Jaguar was in until recently.

Minpin

Quote from: TBR on June 21, 2009, 05:57:47 PM
The DB9 has been out for ~5 years and was based on a design language established in the mid-90s itself.

I think it looks fabulous, but Aston needs to make a change with their styling or I am afraid they will find themselves in the same boat Jaguar was in until recently.

As long as the AM's keep selling like hot cakes, why should the designers care?  :huh:
?Do you expect me to talk?"
"No, Mr Bond. I expect you to die!?

TBR

Quote from: Minpin on June 21, 2009, 09:25:27 PM
As long as the AM's keep selling like hot cakes, why should the designers care?  :huh:

Production lead times. Eventually the designs will fall out favor and the designers can't tell when.

Hachee

I personally think designs change too rapidly now.  Astons always had long model cycles, and the current designs are still beautiful and thoroughly modern.  They shouldn't go so long as to get stale, but I don't think the current crop of Astons has come close to this.  I do, however, think the DBS, which of course is gorgeous, is too much of a warmed over DB9, and not a worthy Vanquish successor, in terms of looks.  I loved that car.

Colonel Cadillac

#9
Quote from: TBR on June 21, 2009, 05:57:47 PM
The DB9 has been out for ~5 years and was based on a design language established in the mid-90s itself.

I think it looks fabulous, but Aston needs to make a change with their styling or I am afraid they will find themselves in the same boat Jaguar was in until recently.

I disagree, their cars are beautiful and so few sell that it's hard for them to look dated or be considered an old design. This design language can stick around for awhile longer.

The Rapide looks incredible, but why a 4 seater?  :banghead: Why have a pretty wood console when you can have a seat? 4 seater sedans are ridiculous.

TBR

Quote from: Colonel Cadillac on June 22, 2009, 09:28:16 AM


I disagree, their cars are beautiful and so few sell that it's hard for them to look dated or be considered an old design. This design language can stick around for awhile longer.

The Rapide looks incredible, but why a 4 seater?  :banghead: Why have a pretty wood console when you can have a seat? 4 seater sedans are ridiculous.

Like I said, I think the design style has a bit of life in it, but if they don't start thinking about changing it they are in danger of getting caught with their pants down.

ChrisV

Quote from: TBR on June 22, 2009, 12:14:36 PM
Like I said, I think the design style has a bit of life in it, but if they don't start thinking about changing it they are in danger of getting caught with their pants down.

Like Porsche.


er...
Like a fine Detroit wine, this vehicle has aged to budgetary perfection...

TBR

Quote from: ChrisV on June 22, 2009, 12:25:33 PM
Like Porsche.


er...

No, like Aston Martin in the late '80s or Jaguar in the early '00s.

For whatever reason Porsche is a special case.

SVT666

I like it, but the back doors look a lot smaller then in previous pics.

SVT666

Quote from: Hachee on June 22, 2009, 07:09:23 AM
I personally think designs change too rapidly now. 
I don't think they change fast enough.  I like the days when there were differences every year.

Minpin

It's not like AM has needed any life changing redesigns in their lifetimes either. The DB5 and the DB9 still share a lot of similiar qualities, just like a 997 and the 911E
?Do you expect me to talk?"
"No, Mr Bond. I expect you to die!?

TBR

Quote from: Minpin on June 22, 2009, 12:41:18 PM
It's not like AM has needed any life changing redesigns in their lifetimes either. The DB5 and the DB9 still share a lot of similiar qualities, just like a 997 and the 911E

That's true. Porsche's style seems to be constantly evolving while AM's gets stuck in ruts every so often.

sportyaccordy

AM's style is only old in pictures. In the flesh the cars are phenomenally gorgeous

mzziaz

Gorgeous car, like alle current AMs.

However, the design really has been around for a while.
Cuore Sportivo

Tave

#19
Quote from: Colonel Cadillac on June 22, 2009, 09:28:16 AM
The Rapide looks incredible, but why a 4 seater?  :banghead: Why have a pretty wood console when you can have a seat? 4 seater sedans are ridiculous.

You don't understand the idea of an Aston. Brilliance and class don't waste their time with a bench seat. Grandma Phyllis and Uncle Johnny aren't going to use it to haul the 4 kids to 7-11.
As I write, highly civilized human beings are flying overhead, trying to kill me.

Quote from: thecarnut on March 16, 2008, 10:33:43 AM
Depending on price, that could be a good deal.

Hachee

Quote from: TBR on June 22, 2009, 12:47:06 PM
That's true. Porsche's style seems to be constantly evolving while AM's gets stuck in ruts every so often.

The 911 is really a singular case - it's an iconic design that for whatever reason has continued to work, without looking dated.  There's probably never been another similar case.  Astons get stuck because (more so in the past), a design would go 10, 12 or more years, and by the end of the run, they're dated.  I personally loved the DB6 (V8), even at the end, but it was definitely a "classic" design by then. 

CALL_911

Quote from: Tave on June 23, 2009, 01:20:17 PM
You don't understand the idea of an Aston. Brilliance and class don't waste their time with a bench seat. Grandma Phyllis and Uncle Johnny aren't going to use it to haul the 4 kids to 7-11.

Right, so why bother with a sedan at all?


2004 S2000
2016 340xi

Minpin

?Do you expect me to talk?"
"No, Mr Bond. I expect you to die!?

Tave

Quote from: CALL_911 on June 23, 2009, 05:04:58 PM
Right, so why bother with a sedan at all?

Because you can't take Sir Alfred and the lady Bethany to the Royal Philharmonic in a 2+2, you bloody idiot.
As I write, highly civilized human beings are flying overhead, trying to kill me.

Quote from: thecarnut on March 16, 2008, 10:33:43 AM
Depending on price, that could be a good deal.

Cookie Monster

Quote from: Minpin on June 23, 2009, 05:10:49 PM

Oh my god... that's like a couple of MR2's and a few E30's right there. :drool:
RWD > FWD
President of the "I survived the Volvo S80 Thread" Club
2007 Mazda MX-5 | 1999 Honda Nighthawk 750 | 1989 Volvo 240 | 1991 Toyota 4Runner | 2006 Honda CBR600F4i | 2015 Yamaha FJ-09 | 1999 Honda CBR600F4 | 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Yamaha YZ426F | 2006 Yamaha FZ1 | 2002 Honda CBR954RR | 1996 Subaru Outback | 2018 Subaru Crosstrek | 1986 Toyota MR2
Quote from: 68_427 on November 27, 2016, 07:43:14 AM
Or order from fortune auto and when lyft rider asks why your car feels bumpy you can show them the dyno curve
1 3 5
├┼┤
2 4 R

CALL_911

Quote from: Tave on June 23, 2009, 05:14:58 PM
Because you can't take Sir Alfred and the lady Bethany to the Royal Philharmonic in a 2+2, you bloody idiot.

Sir Alfred and lady Bethany never wanted an Aston.




2004 S2000
2016 340xi

MrH

Well, Porsche used to be the most profitable car manufacturer before making the terrible decision to buy up VW, so you can't really criticize the way they go about design.

However, I will agree Aston Martins are good looking cars.  But honestly, they've never really done much for me.  Everyone here basically creams their pants when someone posts an image of one.  Good looking cars, but nothing that's really sparked my interest all that much.
2023 Ford Lightning Lariat ER
2019 Acura RDX SH-AWD
2023 BRZ Limited

Previous: '02 Mazda Protege5, '08 Mazda Miata, '05 Toyota Tacoma, '09 Honda Element, '13 Subaru BRZ, '14 Hyundai Genesis R-Spec 5.0, '15 Toyota 4Runner SR5, '18 Honda Accord EX-L 2.0t, '01 Honda S2000, '20 Subaru Outback XT, '23 Chevy Bolt EUV

Tave

Quote from: CALL_911 on June 23, 2009, 07:16:47 PM
Sir Alfred and lady Bethany never wanted an Aston.

It's not their car. It's yours. You're Sir Henry, and you want something in the stable to take your mates out for a night on the town.


And anyone with a Phantom or Aston in the driveway could have both if they wanted them (and probably do). :nutty:
As I write, highly civilized human beings are flying overhead, trying to kill me.

Quote from: thecarnut on March 16, 2008, 10:33:43 AM
Depending on price, that could be a good deal.

TBR

Quote from: MrH on June 23, 2009, 08:02:49 PM
Well, Porsche used to be the most profitable car manufacturer before making the terrible decision to buy up VW, so you can't really criticize the way they go about design.

However, I will agree Aston Martins are good looking cars.  But honestly, they've never really done much for me.  Everyone here basically creams their pants when someone posts an image of one.  Good looking cars, but nothing that's really sparked my interest all that much.

Most profitable per unit. And I think their investment operations are part of the problem (for a couple of years they were actually legally considered an investment bank).

omicron

Quote from: CALL_911 on June 23, 2009, 07:16:47 PM
Sir Alfred and lady Bethany never wanted an Aston.




Good God, man. A Phantom is for footballers with leather balls for heads and coiffured stick-insects draped on either side, not the old-money elite! A trip to finishing school is in order.